Penicillium roqueforti Final Risk Assessment
ATTACHMENT I--FINAL RISK ASSESSMENT PENICILLIUM ROQUEFORTI
Penicillium roqueforti is a common saprophytic fungus, that is widespread in nature and can be isolated from soil, decaying organic substances and plant parts. The major industrial uses of this fungus are for the production of blue cheeses, flavoring agents, antibacterials, polysaccharides, proteases and other enzymes.
While the fungus has been a constituent of Roquefort, Stilton and other blue cheeses and eaten by humans since about 500 AD, there is considerable evidence to indicate that most strains are capable of producing harmful secondary metabolites (alkaloids and other mycotoxins) under certain growth conditions (Peberdy, 1985; Sharpell, 1985).
History of Commercial Use and Products Subject to TSCA Jurisdiction
The chief industrial use of the fungus P. roqueforti, is in the production of Roquefort cheese. Strains of the microorganism are also used to produce compounds that can be employed as antibiotics, flavors and fragrances (Sharpell, 1985); uses not regulated under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA).
The organism can also be used for the production of proteases and specialty chemicals, such as methyl ketones (Larroche et al, 1989) and 2heptanone (Larroche and Gros, 1989; Jong and Gantt, 1987). Other strains of Penicillium species are also useful in biodeterioration (Peberdy, 1985) which may be used in applications subject to TSCA reporting.
II. IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MICROORGANISM
Fungi, in general, can be relatively difficult to identify or classify compared to other microbial groups such as the bacteria. Fungi are classified by morphological features that vary with cultural techniques and the experience of the taxonomist. Reliance on morphological characters may not serve as a dependable model for identification of closely related species. Molecular methods which are currently applied to bacteria have not advanced as rapidly with fungi. However,certain fungal genera, including Penicillium, can be classified with a fair degree of certainty by using standard media.
A. Definition of Penicillium roqueforti
Since the turn of the century, Thom (1910) and others have studied the genus Penicillium because of the importance of these fungi in the fermentation process of cheese-making. Raper and Thom's "Manual of Penicillia" (1949) has been accepted for decades as the standard descriptive monograph. Raper and Thom (1949) placed the cheesefermenting penicillia in two separate series, the P. roqueforti and the P. camemberti series. Given the considerable experience with these fungi, mycologists can now readily identify an isolate of Penicillium using standard media originally described by Raper and Thom (Alexopoulos and Mims, 1979). In practice, closely related strains with identical micromorphology were sometimes considered separate species (Samson and Gams, 1984). More recently, a species concept based primarily on morphological characters of conidiophores and conidia for P. roqueforti was adopted by Samson et al. (1977).
B. Taxonomic Characterization
P. roqueforti is traditionally identified by this organism's morphological characteristics and colony morphology when grown on specific growth media. Raper et al., (1968) describe colonies on Czapek's medium as broadly spreading, 5.0 to 6.0 cm in 1012 days at room temperature, heavily sporulating, velvety with the surface fairly smooth or plane with broad, white, thin margin, cobwebby with hyphae radiating partly on the surface and partly just below the surface of the medium. Green conidial areas follow the hyphae in unevenly radiating lines. At margins, white shades into bluegreen and various other shades of green. Reverse side is shades of green to bluish green, to almost black.
Morphology of the organism itself is based on features of the brushshaped fruiting head; size, shape and number of conidia; size and number of sterigmata; whether there is branching; length and surface markings of the conidiophore; overall dimensions; and like characters. Thus, examination of both colony morphology and microscopy wet mounts is necessary. While appearance may vary according to the medium on which cultures are grown, characteristics remain quite stable when subcultured on the same medium.
Numerous studies have identified and classified P. roqueforti at the genus, species and strain levels. The genus and species of P. roqueforti are considered to be well defined on the basis of morphological features. The predominant characteristics are the production of asexual spores in phialides with a distinctive brushshaped configuration (Raper et al. 1944; Raper, 1957; Samson and Gams 1984).
Since Raper and Thom's work (1949), more than 70 additional species have been described for the genus Penicillium. Even today, the taxonomy is still governed mainly by morphological features. As these properties are relatively unstable under mutagenesis and selection, or long-term artificial culturing, the current taxonomy of some industrial strains may be difficult to ascertain.
Although the taxonomy of this group is related to a constancy of morphological features such as size and morphology of individual conidia, phialide shape and colony color (Raper and Thom, 1949; Pitt, 1979) some of these characteristics are dependent to an extent on the medium used to culture the fungus. Therefore, strictly defined growth conditions are required for the current taxonomy. Improvements in the taxonomy based on examining additional features such as physiological characters, DNA/DNA hybridization, ribosomal RNA sequences and the production of unique arrays of secondary metabolites are evolving, but not yet systematized (Samson and Gams, 1984).
Many of these Penicillium species either do not possess a sexual state (teleomorph) or it is rarely found and assumed to play a very minor part in their genetics in nature. According to Peterson (1990), no sexual state has ever been described for P. roqueforti. Fungi without sexual forms are placed in a taxonomic grouping called the fungi imperfecti (anamorph). At the present time P. roqueforti is in the fungi imperfecti grouping. Even though P. roqueforti has no reported sexual stage, it has been placed in the same taxonomic section with other imperfect penicillia that have been linked to the ascomycete teleomorph Eupenicillium (Peterson, 1990).
C. Related Species of Concern
For the reasons noted above with classification and identification of penicillia, it is frequently difficult to discriminate between closely related species. There are limited cases in which closely related penicillia are found in association with infections as opportunistic pathogens in immunocompromised hosts. However, several species of the genus including P. notatum, P. oxalicum, P. communi, P. corymbiferum, P. expansium and P. urticae are also capable of producing mycotoxins such as roquefortine (Scott, 1984).
III. HAZARD ASSESSMENT
A. Human Health Hazards
The pathogenic potential of P. roqueforti is very low, even as an opportunistic pathogen. There are limited cases in which closely related penicillia are found in association with infections. Peberdy (1985) in discussing the possibility of penicillia adopting the role of opportunistic pathogens inhumans, mentions the report of Eschete et al. (1981) describing a case of P. chrysogenum as the cause of endopthalmitis.
There is one documented case of hypersensitivity caused by P. roqueforti. Campbell et al. (1983) described a patient who worked in a plant where blue cheese was manufactured by use of P. roqueforti. This patient developed a cough, dyspnea, malaise, reduced lung volume and bibasalar crackles. A chest roentgenogram revealed bilateral infiltrates. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid contained many lymphocytes and antibodies against P. roqueforti. Such antibodies were also present in the patient's serum. However, the allergic reaction to P. roqueforti is apparently low considering its extensive use for cheese production for many years.
The major human health concern for P. roqueforti is its ability to produce mycotoxins.
1. Toxins produced by Penicillium roqueforti and their toxicity
Many of the strains of P. roqueforti isolated from
commercial blue cheeses as well as from moldy grains and nuts
have been shown in the laboratory to produce mycotoxins (Jong and Gantt, 1987). These mycotoxins include isofumigaclavin C, penicillic acid, PR toxin, patulin, botryodiploidin and roquefortine. The effects noted with ingestion of these mycotoxins are mutagenesis and tumorigenesis as well as extensive liver, kidney and nerve damage. Although there is a lack of documented cases of human toxicity, studies have shown that in the laboratory industrial strains of P. roqueforti can produce mycotoxins (Betina, 1989; Wei et al., 1985). However, the endpoints that are noted and the doses at which the effects are observed frequently are based on LD50 and omit references to No Observable Effect Level (NOEL) dosages. Finally, there is no assurance that the below noted data were derived from studies that employed Good Laboratory Principles.
Two of the toxins, roquefortine and PR toxin have vertebrate
LD50 values of about 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal (CRC Handbook of Microbiology, 1987). This level of toxicity has routinely been considered "highly toxic" in EPA's evaluation of premanufacture notices (PMNs) on new chemicals. However, production of these toxins is related to the composition of the growth substrate and usually occurs in stationary phase cultures. While not universally true, mycotoxins are generally produced on high carbon/nitrogen solid substrates (Ciegler and Kurtzmann, 1970; Scott, 1984). The level of toxin production for specific cultures is variable but for research purposes can be induced to be as high as 1 mg/liter (Hohn, 1990).
Scott (1981) summarized these toxins and their synonyms, as
well as their possible presence in blue cheese.
Roquefortine is an indole mycotoxin. It is produced by P.
roqueforti and some other Penicillium species, namely P. notatum,
P. oxalicum, P. communi, P. corymbiferum, P. expansium and
P. urticae (Scott, 1984). Roquefortine has been assigned the
5a,10b,11,11atetrahydro2Hpyrazino[1',2':1,5]pyrrol[2,3,b]indo le1,4(3H,6H)dione (Scott and Kennedy, 1976). It is identical to roquefortine C.
Ueno and Ueno (1978) reported an intraperitoneal (IP) LD50
for roquefortine of 1520 mg/kg in rats. Arnold et al. (1987)
reported that roquefortine causes convulsive seizures when
administered to mice IP in doses of 50100 mg/kg (Scott et al.,
1976). They reported LD50 of 169 mg/kg in male and 184 mg/kg in
female CR57 mice and 189 mg/kg in male and 184 mg/kg in female
SwissWebster mice. Neurologic properties reported by Scott et
al., 1976, were not seen in the Arnold et al. (1987) study.
However, Wagener et al. (1980) reported paralytic activity in
dayold cockerels incubated with roquefortine.
Roquefortine was found to occur primarily in the mycelium of
surface grown cultures of P. roqueforti. Independently, Scott et
al. (1976) found roquefortine in yeast extract sucrosegrown
mycelium of P. roqueforti. Low concentrations of roquefortine C were found in roqueforttype blue cheese by Ohmomo (1975), but exact concentrations were not reported. Scott and Kennedy (1976) found concentrations of roquefortine up to 6.8 mg/kg in samples of market blue cheese they examined. Ware et al. (1980) reported average levels of 0.42 æg/g of roquefortine in 12 samples of blue cheese and of 0.045 æg/g in two samples of blue cheese dressing. In fact, roquefortine seems to be produced by most strains of P. roqueforti isolated from blue cheese or used as cheese starters (Scott et al., 1977). A small percentage of strains recovered from meat also produce roquefortine (Leistner and Eckardt, 1979).
Schoch et al. (1984) conducted mutagenicity studies by the
Ames test on six strains of P. roqueforti used commercially for
the production of moldripened cheese. They also checked the six
strains for roquefortine production and for mutagenic activity of
the roquefortine. Neither the fungus or roquefortine showed any
mutagenic activity by the Ames test (Schoch et al., 1983). Frank et al. (1977) fed 2.5 mL of a suspension of P. roqueforti and the cheese produced by the P. roqueforti once weekly to rats by gavage over their life span. They also gave subcutaneous injections of these suspensions once weekly subcutaneously for 52 weeks. There was no evidence of a possible carcinogenic effect.
Kough (1991) quotes the CRC Handbook of Microbiology, 1987,
as showing roquefortine having an LD50 value of about 10 mg/kg
which would place it among those substances considered "highly
toxic" in the EPA's evaluation of chemicals under TSCA. An oral LD50 for roquefortine was not available. Frank et al. (1977) fed both a suspension of P. roqueforti and the cheese produced by the P. roqueforti to rats with no ill effect. They also gave these
suspensions by subcutaneous injection without effect. However,
the strains with which they worked had not been tested for toxin
production. Scott (1981) believes "...no potential acute human
health hazard can be extrapolated from the amounts of
roquefortine present in blue cheese." However, until more is
known about roquefortine, the amounts produced during commercial
handling and its stability, it cannot be considered to be without
some potential hazard to human and/or animal health.
b. PR Toxin and Eremofortines (and Derivatives)
PR toxin (7acetoxy5,6epoxy3,5,6,7,8,8ahexahydro
carboxaldehyde) (Arnold et al., 1987) is one of the most acutely
toxic metabolites known to be formed by P. roqueforti (Scott,
1981). It is consistently detected, and frequently found in blue
cheese (Leistner and Eckardt, 1979; Orth, 1976; Polonsky et al., 1980; Wei and Lui, 1985; Wei et al., 1976; Wei et al., 1973). Wei et al. (1973) isolated and partially characterized PR toxin from a strain of P. roqueforti recovered from toxic moldy feeds (later switching to an NRRL strain that proved to be a high producer). Following chromatography, the toxin could be detected by fluorescence under UV light. The median lethal dose of pure PR toxin IP in weanling rats was 11 mg/kg. The oral median lethal dose was 115 mg/kg. Within 10 minutes of an oral dose of about 10 mg (160 mg/kg) animals experienced breathing difficulties which persisted to death (Wei et al., 1973). Oral doses above about 130 to 160 mg/kg body weight were fatal to 60g rats in 36 hours or less. Gross pathology consisted of swollen, gasfilled stomach and intestines, while histological changes included congestion and edema of lung, brains and kidney with degenerative changes in liver and kidney and hemorrhage in the kidney as well.
Chen et al. (1982) studied the toxic effects of PR toxin in
mice, rats, anesthetized cats and preparations of isolated rat
auricle. Toxic effects in mice and rats included abdominal
writhing, decrease of motor activity and respiration rate,
weakness of the hind leg and ataxia. Intraperitoneal LD50 in
mice was 5.8 mg/kg. Mice, rats and cats injected IP developed
ascites fluid and edema of the lungs and scrotum; IV injections
caused edema of the lung and large volumes of pleural and
pericardial fluids. LD50 in rats was 11.6 mg/kg IP and 8.2 mg/kg
IV. Although arrhythmias occurred in the late shock stage, the
contractile force of the isolated rat auricle was more affected
than the heart rate. The investigators concluded that PR toxin
produced acute toxic effects in animals via an increase of
capillary permeability and direct damage to lungs, heart, liver,
After 1015 minutes, all weanling rats injected IP with 1.5
mg PR toxin developed breathing problems, motor incoordination
and flaccid paralysis, particularly in the back legs (Polonelli
et al., 1978). Death ensued in 24 hours. Histological tests
showed turbid swelling of hepatocyte cytoplasm. Intraperitoneal
LD50 was 14.5 mg/kg body weight. Rats administered 0.5 mg PR
toxin orally procapite/prodic for two months showed no visible
effect. The intent to continue oral feedings was mentioned by
Polonelli et al. (1978), but a review of the literature did not
reveal published results. Mutagenicity of PR Toxin (1978) was
demonstrated by Nagao et al. (1976) and Ueno et al. (1978) by the
Salmonella typhimurium test and by Wei et al. (1979) by testing with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Neurospora crassa.
Polonelli et al. (1982) carried out preliminary studies on
possible carcinogenic effects of PR toxin in rats. They reported
that 2 of 10 albino rats fed PR toxin developed tumors, i.e., one
squamous cell epithelioma and one uterine sarcoma within 449 and
551 days, respectively. The control group developed one
adenocarcinoma after a longer time span of 931 days.
Polonelli et al. (1978) also studied the conditions under
which PR toxin is formed. They found PR toxin is produced only
in stationary cultures, beginning on the 9th day of incubation,
and increasing up to the 35th day, at which time it begins to
decrease and disappears on approximately the 120th day. It is
found only in the medium in which it is grown and within the pH
range of 4.59.0. Toxigenesis occurred within the temperature
range of 10°30°C with the optimum temperature at 24°C. Toxin
production was dependent upon the amount of sucrose in the
medium, and began at 5% sucrose and reached a maximum at 15%. No
PR toxin was formed under microaerophilic conditions. The
authors speculate that microaerophilic conditions prevail in most
cheeses, which could explain why PR toxin is not generally found
in them. However, Arnold et al. (1987) pointed out that PR toxin
reacts with ammonia and free amino acids present in high
concentrations in blue cheese. PR imine and reaction products
formed by mixing PR toxin with Lalphaalanine or Lleucine were
tested for toxicity. The acute toxicities of the PR derivatives
were considerably lower than that of the parent compound. Scott
and Kanhere (1979) noted similar phenomena. They conclude that
both PR toxin and PR imine are unstable in blue cheese and
believe that the agents responsible for destruction of PR toxin
formed during ripening of the blue cheese are most likely amino
compounds. However, they felt that more definitive experiments
would be needed to assess any possible latent toxicological
hazard from PR toxin, taking into account the cheese as a whole.
PR toxin enters into reactions involving its aldehyde
function to form crosslinks between DNA and protein (Moule et
al., 1980). It also inhibits in vitro transcriptional capacity
of nuclei isolated from the liver of male Wistar rats when the
compound is administered in vivo. The toxin inhibited both the
RNA polymerase systems responsible for ribosomal RNA synthesis
and heterogenous nuclear RNA synthesis (Moule et al., 1976). Lee
et al. (1984) found that PR toxin inhibited the in vitro
activities of rat liver DNA polymerases alpha, beta and gamma, as
well. Hsieh et al. (1986) studied the effect of PR toxin in the
mitochondrial HCO3ATPase of the rat brain, heart and kidney.
They concluded that of the three tissues tested, HCO3ATPase of
the heart mitochondria was most sensitive to PR toxin and that
the HCO3ATPase was inhibited in a noncompetitive, irreversible
Dire et al. (1978) reported that P. roqueforti metabolites
eremofortin A, eremofortin B, eremofortin C and eremofortin D, at
10 mg/mL had no effect on the ciliate protozoan C. campylum that
they were using to detect toxicity. Moreau (1980) claimed that
neither PR toxin or other derivatives of eremophilane, i.e.,
eremofortines, are found in cheese because of their instability.
This was corroborated by Sieber (1978) who reported that PR toxin
was isolated from P. roqueforti strains incubated on special
media and also from P. roqueforti strains used for cheese
manufacture. However, he found cheese ripening conditions did
not favor production of the toxin.
c. Isofumigaclavine A and B
Isofumigaclavine A is another alkaloid produced by P.
roqueforti. This toxin and the product of its hydrolysis,
isofumigaclavine B, are identical with roquefortines A and B,
respectively. These toxins were reported by Ohmomo and co
workers (1975, 1977) and by Kozlovskii (1979). Scott et
al. (1977) reported yields of isofumigaclavine A determined over
7 to 35 days to be consistently low. These investigators tested
P. roqueforti in 200 mL media for isofumigaclavine A production
after 18 days incubation at 25°C. One strain of P. roqueforti
did not produce detectable amounts of isofumigaclavine A in
either the mycelia or the media. A second strain produced 0.5
and 0.1 mg in the mycelium and medium, respectively, in Medium I
and 1.0 and 0.1 mg in mycelium and medium, respectively, in
Medium II; a third medium did not produce detectable levels.
However, when cultures were grown at 15°C instead of 25°C, 2
mg/mycelial mat of isofumigaclavine A formed, about three times
that formed at 25°C. No isofumigaclavine A was detected in the
medium; 0.06 mg is the limit of detection. In fact,
isofumigaclavine A yields exceeded those of roquefortine in
several commercial blue cheese samples (Scott and Kennedy, 1976).
It is of interest that blue cheese is generally ripened by
storage at 9°12°C for three months. Scott and Kennedy (1976)
found roquefortine in 16 of 16 samples of cheese from seven
countries; isofumigaclavine A (mean 0.61 microgram/g) and traces
of isofumigaclavine B were also usually present.
d. Dihydroroquefortine, Festuclavine and Marcfortine A (Alkaloids)
Some alkaloids produced by P. roqueforti are believed to
serve as intermediates in the production of other alkaloids.
Dihydroroquefortine, also known as roquefortine D, is described
by Scott (1981) as "one of the two stereoisomeric 12,13
dihydroroquefortines." Roquefortine D is probably a precursor of
roquefortine C (Ohmomo et al., 1975, 1977; Kozlovskii et al., 1979). Kozlovskii et al. (1979) reported isolating 3,12dihydroroquefortine, a derivative of roquefortine.
Festuclavine is a clavine alkaloid toxin produced by P.
roqueforti. It was isolated and identified by Kozlovskii et al.
(1979). Marcfortine A is a novel alkaloid, also obtained from P.
roqueforti (Polonsky et al., 1980). Toxicological data on these
chemicals is limited.
e. Mycophenolic Acid
Mycophenolic acid is a metabolite reported to be produced by
all strains of P. roqueforti tested and by a few other species of
penicillia (La Font et al., 1979). It has antibiotic activity
against bacteria and dermatophytic fungi and also interferes with
viral multiplication (Planterose, 1969). It has been used in the
treatment of psoriasis (Marinari et al., 1977). The toxicity for
mammals appears to be low: LD50 in rats is 2,500 mg/kg and 500
mg/kg IV; in mice the LD50 is 700 mg/kg and 450 mg/kg IV (Wilson,
1971). Chronicity tests of daily oral doses of 80 and 320 mg/kg
for one year did not cause apparent signs of toxicity in rabbits
(Adams et al., 1975). However, rats given daily oral doses of 30
mg/kg died within 9 weeks and rhesus monkeys receiving 150 mg/kg
daily developed abdominal colic, bloody diarrhea, weight loss and
anemia after two weeks (Carter et al., 1969). Thirtyfive human
patients who received high oral doses of mycophenolic acid (2.4 g
to 7.2 g daily) for 52104 weeks had some adverse reactions,
including cramps, nausea and diarrhea (Marinari et al., 1977). Scott (1981) reported that Umeda et al. (1977) induced mutations and chromosome aberrations in a mouse mammary carcinoma cell line
with mycophenolic acid, but the compound was not mutagenic in
Salmonella systems (Nagao et al., 1976; Webner et al., 1978). La Font et al. (1979) checked 16 strains of P. roqueforti for mycophenolic acid using four media to test production, thinlayer chromatography for assays and chicken embryos for toxicity tests. All strains produced mycophenolic acid, some on the order of 0.8 to 4 mg/g of dry culture. Greatest yields were obtained after 10 days of incubation at 15°C. La Font et al. (1979) mentionstudies (unpublished) using fluorodensitometric assays for mycophenolic acid in marketed bluemold cheeses; 38% of studied samples were positive with 3% of the cheeses having levels of mycophenolic acid higher than 10 mg/kg. Strain differences in the P. roqueforti as to the amount of mycophenolic acid produced were noted.
Engel et al. (1982) did not find that all strains of P.
roqueforti produced mycophenolic acid. They found that out of 80
strains, 20 were able to produce up to 600 mg in 2% yeast
extract5% sucrose broth. Sixtytwo of the strains had been
recovered from starter cultures of blueveined cheeses from
western Europe. Only seven of these 62 produced mycophenolic
acid. All of the producer strains came from an individual; and
in the market, cheeses with mycophenolic acid as high as 5 mg/kg
of mycophenolic acid were only found in samples from this same
factory. Toxicity tests in this study were performed with
Detroit 98 and Girardi Heart human cell lines and one established
pig kidney cell line (Am II). Schoch et al. (1983) did not
detect any mycophenolic acid in the six strains of P. roqueforti
they cultivated on semisynthetic medium.
The oral LD50 of 700 mg/kg in mice placed mycophenolic acid
in EPA's moderately toxic category.
f. Patulin, Penicillic Acid and Citrinin
Although there have been surveys in cheeses for the toxic
metabolites patulin, penicillic acid and citrinin; they have not
been found. Nonetheless, they are known metabolites of P. roqueforti. Olivigni and Bullerman (1978) reported the production of patulin and penicillic acid by an atypical P. roqueforti isolated from cheddar cheese. The culture extracts were toxic to Bacillus megaterium and chicken embryos. Commercial strains of P. roqueforti used to produce blue cheeses were not shown to produce these metabolites. Moubasher et al. (1978) found penicillic acid in two of six strains of P. roqueforti recovered from blue cheese, and Leistner and Eckardt (1979) in one of 80 strains isolated from food and grains. Scott (1981) reviewed other recoveries of penicillic acid: Karow et al. (1944) obtained it from P. suavolens (synonym for P. roqueforti) and Samsen et al. (1977) from fermented cheese. Seven isolates of P. roqueforti isolated from moldy grapes all produced patulin after 9 days at 25°C in yeast extract2% sucrose15% medium. Amounts varied from 201267 micrograms/5 mL cultures. Six cheese isolates produced no patulin under these conditions. One isolate from fresh grapes produced patulin. One isolate from meat produced both patulin and the nephrotoxin citrinin; the other two isolates produced patulin only (Scott, 1977).
The available toxicological data on these chemicals is
limited. Scott (1977), from results of subcutaneous injections
of rodents, reported that these two chemicals may have
carcinogenic capabilities, but a longterm oral feeding of rats
gave no such indication (Osswald et al., 1978).
It is apparent that patulin and penicillic acid are not
frequently formed by P. roqueforti (though they may be more
common in moldy cheese that perhaps has been stored too long).
They are also unstable in cheese (Lieu and Bullerman, 1977).
This all suggests that the health hazards posed by these two
substances are slight.
Stability of citrinin is uncertain in moist grains
(Mintzlaff and Machnik, 1972). Little work appears to have been done with this toxin, perhaps because it has not been among the metabolites that P. roqueforti produces in cheese.
Botryodiplodin has been reported as a mycotoxin synthesized
by P. roqueforti. Moulé et al. (1981) reported that this toxin
inhibited cell multiplication in growing cell cultures at
concentrations without effect on cultures nearing or at
confluence. In the growing culture the toxin affected DNA, RNA
and protein synthesis. Moulé et al. (1982) further showed that
botryodiplodin induces DNAprotein crosslinks in rat hepatoma
cells and hamster lung fibroblasts. Botryodiplodin was not among
the mycotoxins detected in the six P. roqueforti strains isolated
from moldripened cheese (Schoch et al., 1983).
h. Siderophores, Betaines and "Other" Toxins
Scott (1981) summarizes the other possible toxic metabolites
produced by P. roqueforti as: ferrichrome, which was found in
cheese together with an unknown negatively charged siderophore,
which had 510 microgram/g siderophore activity (it is speculated
that siderophores in food may complex iron, making it unavailable
for bodily use); coprogen which is not found in cheese, and about
which little appears to be known; watersoluble betaines,
ergothioneine and hercynine, also about which little is known;
toxins "1, 2, and 3", the last two of which had weak acute
toxicity for mice. Scott (1981) states that there are reports of
toxigenic P. roqueforti strains recovered from chestnuts, pecans
and meat products.
i. Combined Effects of Toxins
No reports were found that deal with possible combined toxin
effects as they might occur in a product.
Health effect concerns for this organism lie with its
production of a variety of mycotoxins, some of which have been
studied rather extensively and some of which are so newly
described that they have received very little attention. Some of
these mycotoxins have been shown to be produced by P. roqueforti
strains used for cheese production and some have been detected in
small amounts in the cheese itself. PR toxin and roquefortine
appear to be the most toxic of the mycotoxins produced by P.
roqueforti. PR toxin, one of the most potent mycotoxins, is
unstable and deteriorates rapidly, so apparently under normal
production conditions does not pose a health effects problem.
Roquefortine has been recovered from blue cheese at low levels
and there have been no reported adverse effects from consumption
of the cheese.
The composition of medium used to make cheese and the length
of time and conditions of the fermentation lead to highly
variable results with respect to the composition and amounts of
mycotoxins produced. In general, mycotoxins are produced in
media with a high carbon to nitrogen ratio. The production of
mycotoxins in TSCA-related usage is less likely as the production
of specialty chemicals is expected to occur over significantly
shorter time frames compared with the fermentation of cheese.
Under these conditions the production of mycotoxins during
fermentation for specialty chemicals is anticipated to occur at
lower levels, if at all, compared with the production of cheese.
B. Environmental Hazards
1. Hazards to Plants
P. roqueforti is not a known pathogen of plants.
Penicillium species are known to cause the deterioration of
stored agricultural products. The species P. expansum,
P. digitatum and P. italicum are responsible for significant
losses of stored citrus, apples and pears (Peberdy, 1985). All
but 3 of the strains of P. roqueforti listed for distribution by
the ATCC require a USDA permit due to their ability to degrade
seeds and plant products (Singh, 1990). However, there are no
known published reports which document P. roqueforti as infecting
2. Animal Hazards
P. roqueforti is not a known pathogen of animals. Penicillia are saprophytes that play an important role in cycling organic substrates. The penicillia are also responsible for the biodeterioration of stored grains and silage. Feeding maize silage infected with P. roqueforti to 112 dairy cows resulted in loss of appetite, cessation of rumen activity and gut inflammation (Vesely et al., 1981). First calves aborted in the 7th and 8th months. Sterile maize silage inoculated with P. roqueforti and incubated at 20°C produced up to 160 mg/kg PR toxin. In addition, a dose of 0.01 micrograms of PR toxin was extremely toxic to 40hold chicken embryos. Many fungal species including P. roqueforti, have been shown to be capable of producing toxins in stored grain and silage. These mycotoxins, PR toxin and roquefortine, produced in P. roqueforti molded feed grain have been implicated, but not documented as the cause of instances of spontaneous bovine abortion and placental retention (Wei et al., 1973; Moreau and Moss, 1979; Haggblom, 1990) as other toxin producing fungal strains were present. There are no known published reports which document P. roqueforti as infecting animals. Indeed there are few known reports of any Penicillium species causing infection in an animal.
IV. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
A. Worker Exposure
P. roqueforti is considered a Class 1 Containment Agent under the National Institute of Health (NIH) Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1986).
No data were available for assessing the release and survival specifically for fermentation facilities using P. roqueforti. Therefore, the potential worker exposures and routine releases to the environment from large-scale, conventional fermentation processes were estimated on information available from eight premanufacture notices submitted to EPA under TSCA Section 5 and from published information collected from non-engineered microorganisms (Reilly, 1991). These values are based on reasonable worst-case scenarios and typical ranges or values are given for comparison.
During fermentation processes, worker exposure is possible during laboratory pipetting, inoculation, sampling, harvesting, extraction, processing and decontamination procedures. A typical site employs less than 10 workers/shift and operates 24 hours/daythroughout the year. NIOSH has conducted walk-through surveys of several fermentation facilities in the enzyme industry and monitored for microbial air contamination. These particular facilities were not using recombinant microorganisms, but the processes were considered typical of fermentation process technology. Area samples were taken in locations where the potential for worker exposure was considered to be potentially greatest, i.e., near the fermentor, the seed fermentor, sampling ports, and separation processes (either filter press or rotary drum filter). The workers with the highest potential average exposures at the three facilities visited were those involved in air sampling. Area samples near the sampling port revealed average airborne concentrations ranging from 350 to 648 cfu/m3. Typically, the Chemical Engineering Branch would not use area monitoring data to estimate occupational exposure levels since the correlation between area concentrations and worker exposure is highly uncertain. Personal sampling data are not available at the present time. Thus, area sampling data have been the only means of assessing exposures for previous PMN biotechnology submissions. Assuming that 20 samples per day are drawn and that each sample takes up to 5 minutes to collect, the duration of exposure for a single worker will be about 1.5 hours/day. Assuming that the concentration of microorganisms in the worker's breathing zone is equivalent to the levels found in the area sampling, the worst-case daily inhalation exposure is estimated to range up to 650 to 1200 cfu/day. The uncertainty associated with this estimated exposure value is not known (Reilly, 1991).
B. Environmental and General Exposure
1. Fate of the Organism
P. roqueforti is a saprophytic fungus that is typically found in soil and decaying vegetation. Reproduction is asexual and involves the production of conidia. The genus is aerobic, but the oxygen requirements needed for growth have not been determined. Penicillium species are able to utilize a number of carbohydrate and nitrogen sources and can grow over a broad Ph (3-8) range (Peberdy, 1985). These properties make it likely that any released P. roqueforti strains would survive in the environment.
Estimates of the number of P. roqueforti organisms released during production are tabulated in Table 1 (Reilly, 1991). The uncontrolled/untreated scenario assumes no control features for the fermentor offgases, and no inactivation of the fermentation broth for the liquid and solid waste releases. The containment criteria required for the full exemption scenario assume the use of features or equipment that minimize the number of viable cells in the fermentor off-gases. They also assume inactivationprocedures resulting in a validated 6log reduction of the number of viable microorganisms in the liquid and solid wastes relative to the maximum cell density of the fermentation broth.
TABLE 1. Estimated Number of Viable P. roqueforti
Organisms Released During Production
Release Media Untreated Exemption Release
(cfu/day) (cfu/day) (days/year)
Air Vents 2x108 - 1x1011 <2x108 - 1x1011 350
Rotary Drum Filter 250 250 350
Surface Water 7x1012 7x106 90
Soil/Landfill 7x1014 7x108 90
Source: Reilly, 1991
These are "worstcase" estimates which assume that the maximum cell density in the fermentation broth for fungi is 107 cfu/ml, with a fermentor size of 70,000 liters, and the separation efficiency for the rotary drum filter is 99 percent.
Specific data which indicate the survivability of P. roqueforti in the atmosphere after release are currently unavailable. Survival of vegetative cells during aerosolization is typically limited due to stresses such as shear forces, desiccation, temperature, and UV light exposure. However, survival as spores may be expected. As with naturally-occurring strains, human exposure may occur via inhalation as the organisms are dispersed in the atmosphere attached to dust particles, or lofted through mechanical or air disturbance.
Air releases from fermentor offgas could potentially result in nonoccupational inhalation exposures due to point source releases. To estimate exposures from this source, the sector averaging form of the Gaussian algorithm described in Turner (1970) was used. For purposes of this assessment, a release height of 3 meters and downward contact at a distance of 100 meters were assumed. Assuming that there is no removal of organisms by controls/equipment for offgases, potential human inhalation dose rates are estimated to range from 3.0 x 103 to 1.5 x 106 cfu/year for the uncontrolled/untreated scenario and less than that for systems with full exemptions. It should be noted that these estimates represent hypothetical exposures under reasonable worst case conditions (Versar, 1992).
The concentrations of P. roqueforti in surface water were estimated using stream flow values for water bodies receiving process wastewater discharges from facilities within SIC Code 283 (drugs, medicinal chemicals, and pharmaceuticals). The surface water release data (cfu/day) tabulated in Table 1 were divided by the stream flow values to yield a surface water concentration of the organism (cfu/l). The stream flow values for SIC Code 283 were based on discharger location data retrieved from the Industrial Facilities Dischargers (IFD) database on December 5, 1991, and surface water flow data retrieved from the RXGAGE database. Flow values were obtained for water bodies receiving wastewater discharges from 154 indirect (facilities that send their waste to a POTW) and direct dischargers facilities that have a NPDES permit to discharge to surface water). Tenth percentile values indicate flows for smaller rivers within this distribution of 154 receiving water flows and 50th percentile values indicate flows for more average rivers. The flow value expressed as 7Q10 is the lowest flow observed over seven consecutive days during a 10year period. The use of this methodology to estimate concentrations of P. roqueforti in surface water assumes that all of the discharged organisms survive wastewater treatment and that growth is not enhanced by any component of the treatment process. Estimated concentrations of P. roqueforti in surface water for the uncontrolled/untreated and the full exemption scenarios are tabulated in Table 2 (Versar, 1992).
TABLE 2. Penicillium roqueforti Concentrations in Surface Water
Flow Stream Flow Organisms
Mean 7Q10 Mean 7Q10
10th Percentile 156 5.60 4.5x104 1.25x106
50th Percentile 768 68.13 9.11x103 1.03x105
10th Percentile 156 5.60 4.5x10-2 1.25x1000
50th Percentile 768 68.13 9.11x10-3 1.03x10-1
*MLD = million liters per day
Source: Versar, 1992
Since soil is a natural habitat for P. roqueforti, it would be expected to survive, particularly as spores, in soil. Human exposures via dermal contact and ingestion routes, and environmental exposures [i.e., to terrestrial, avian, and aquatic organisms (via runoff)] may occur at the discharge site because of the establishment of P. roqueforti within the soil (Versar, 1991).
Although direct monitoring data are unavailable, worst case estimates do not suggest high levels of exposure of P. roqueforti to either workers or the public resulting from normal fermentation operations.
V. INTEGRATION OF RISK
1. Characterization of the Organism
P. roqueforti is a ubiquitous, saprophytic fungus frequently
found on decomposing organic material. As with all fungi the
conventional means of identification is based on morphological
characteristics. This is in contrast to bacterial systematics,
which rely on biochemical tests that produce qualitative
responses and standardize the identification of the organism.
Given the long history of use of P. roqueforti in microbial
fermentations, the typical source of strains for industrial uses
today would be standard culture collections.
P. roqueforti is principally used in the production of
cheeses, a nonTSCA application. TSCA applications include the
production of enzymes and specialty chemicals through
fermentation processes. Also, there is the possible application
of P. roqueforti for bioremediation processes. The utility of
this organism for microbial fermentation uses is well
2. Risks to Humans
P. roqueforti is a benign, nonpathogenic organism. Among
the literature reviewed for this assessment, there has been only
one reported case of pathogenicity. There are anecdotal reports
of abortion in cattle brought about by the consumption of feed
contaminated with P. roqueforti, although the correlation with
disease is not strong. Contaminated feed can be assumed to be
colonized by a variety of microorganisms which may produce
toxins. There is no report of associating P. roqueforti with
abortion in cattle through Koch's Postulates. Moreover, the
relevance of these reports to human health issues is
The primary potential human health effect of P. roqueforti
is the production of mycotoxins. The most toxic of these are
roquefortine and PR toxin. Other mycotoxins produced by this
organisms appear to be less toxic and of low concern. Health
effects data on PR toxin and roquefortine are based principally
on animal data. An LD50 in rats has been reported as 1020 mg/kg
intraperitoneal. The available data on exposure to roquefortine
and PR toxin appear to be limited to food consumption.
Roquefortine has been recovered from blue cheese at low levels
and there have been no reported adverse effects from consumption
of the cheese.
PR toxin has been shown to cause decreased motor activity
and respiration rates, and hind leg weakness in mice and rats.
It has also been shown to be lethal in rats and mice at
relatively high intraperitoneal doses. Similar to roquefortine,
PR toxin has been recovered from cheese; however, data indicate
that PR toxin is unstable in cheese presumably accounting for the
absence of adverse effects in humans from consumption of this
Conditions conducive to the production of mycotoxins by P.
roqueforti include a medium of high C/N ratios (usually with the
medium supplemented with sucrose), growth of the fungus on the
surface of the medium presumably due to the high oxygen content,
and growth of the fungus in stationary phase. The first two
condition may most likely be encountered during a commercial
Under fermentation conditions, the C/N ratio of the medium
will be tailored to the need of the fungus based on its
nutritional requirements. In general, microorganisms are most
productive during the early phases of the growth stage when
conditions are conducive to vigorous growth (i.e., when
metabolism is highest, nutrient level is greatest, and cellular
waste is lowest). Fungal fermentations, in some cases, have
extended periods of surface/air interface cultivation; a
condition conducive to the production of mycotoxins. However,
the uses of P. roqueforti under TSCA are primarily expected to
include the production of specialty chemicals. Microbial
fermentation for the production of specialty chemicals under TSCA
have a significantly shorter fermentation period (days or weeks)
when compared to typical periods for cheese production (months).
Shorter fermentation periods are less likely to result in
stationary phase growth of the fungus. Finally, the production
of toxins vary between strains of P. roqueforti: under specified
conditions some strains produce mycotoxins while others do not.
P. roqueforti is classified as a class containment 1
microorganism under the NIH Guidelines and is therefore Good
Large Scale Practices containment criteria designed to limit
potential exposure to either the microorganism or its products.
This limited exposure allays concern for exposure of either
workers or the public to mycotoxins produced by this organism.
The unstable nature of the PR toxin further reduces concern for
exposure of workers or the public to this mycotoxin. Overall,
this organism has a history of safe use without noted reports of
adverse human health effects.
3. Risks to the Environment
Effects to nonhuman targets remain low. The concern for
effects on cattle from the consumption of stored silage is based
on anecdotal evidence. Effects were noted to occur following
consumption of moldy silage. The residue contained, among other
organisms, P. roqueforti. However, a more definitive test such
as Koch's Postulates, was not carried out to determine the
causative agent. This organism is not known to be a pathogen of
Potential environmental hazards are mitigated by limitations
to exposure brought about by the conditions of contained use.
The containment conditions and practices employed in industrial
microbial fermentations are designed to limit release of the
organism to the environment.
P. roqueforti is recommended for the tiered exemption.
A. Primary Sources
Adams, E., G. Tood and W. Gibson. 1975. Longterm toxicity study
of mycophenolic acid in rabbits. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
Alexopoulis and C.W. Mims. 1979. Introduction to mycology. John
Wiley and Sons, New York.
Arnold, D.L., P.M. Scott, P.F. McGuire, J. Hawig and E.A.
Nera. 1987. Acute toxicity studies on roquefortine and P.R.
toxin, metabolites of Penicillium roqueforti in the mouse.
Cosmet. Toxicol. 16:369371.(3)
Betina, V. 1989. Mycotoxins, Vol. 9. In Bioactive Molecules.
Elsevier American Publishers, Oxford, Tokyo, NY. (1)
Campbell, J.A., M.J. Kryda, M.W. Trauhaff, J.J. Marx, Jr., and
R.C. Roberts. 1983. Cheese workers hypersensitivity
pneumonitis. Ann.(3) Rev. Resp. Dis. 127:495496.
Carter, S.B., T.J. Franklin, D.F. Jones, B.J. Leonard, S.D.
Mills, R.W. Turner and W.B. Turner and W.B. Turner. 1969.
Mycophenolic Acid: An AntiCancer Compound with Unusual
Properties. Nature (London) 223:848850.
Chen, F.C., C.F. Chen and R.D. Wei. 1982. Acute toxicity of PR
Toxin, a Mycotoxin from Penicillium roqueforti. Toxicol. 20:433
Ciegler, A. and C. Kurtzman. 1970. Penicillic Acid Production by
BlueEye Fungi on Various Agricultural Commodities; Appl.
Microbio. 20:761764. (1)
CRC Handbook of Microbiology. 1987
Dire, D., S. Moreau and M. Cacan. 1978. Use of a Ciliate
Protozoan for Fungal Toxin Studies. Bull. Environ. Contam.
Dynamac. 1991. Human Health Effects of Penicillium roqueforti
Unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Eschete, M.L., J.W. King, B.C. West and A. Oberle. 1981.
Frank, R.K., R. Orth, S. Ivankovic, M. Kuhlmann and D. Schmähl.
1977. Investigations on Carcinogenic Effects of Penicillium
caseicolum and P. roqueforti in Rats. Experentia 33:515516.
Haggblom, P. 1990. Isolation of Roquefortine C from Feed Grain. Appl. and Environ. Microbiol. 56:29342936.
Henis, Y. 1987. Survival and Dormancy of Bacteria. In: Survival
and Dormancy of Bacteria, Wiley Interscience. New York, NY.
Hohn. 1990. In Kough, 1990.
Hsieh, K.P., S. Yu, Y.H. Wei, C.F. Chen and R.D. Wei. 1986.
Inhibitory effect in vitro of PR Toxin, a Mycotoxin from
Penicillium roqueforti, on the mitochondrial HCO33ATPace of Rat
Brain, Heart and Kidney. Toxicol. 24:153160.
Jong, S.C. and M.J.Gantt (eds.). 1987. Catalogue of Fungi and
Yeasts (17th ed.) American Type Culture Collection, Rockville,
Kough, J.L. 1991. Environmental Hazard Assessment of Penicillium roqueforti for 5(h)4 Exemption. Unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Kozlovskii, A.G., T.A. Reshelilova, T.N. Medvedeva,
M.U. Arinbasarov, V.G. Sakharovskij and V.M. Adanin. 1979.
Intracellular and extracellular alkaloids of the fungus
Penicillium roqueforti. Blokhlmya 44:16911700. [Quoted by
Larroche C., Arpah M. and Gros, J.B. 1989. Methylketone by
Caalginate/Eudrasit RL entrapped spores of Penicillium
roqueforti. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11:106112.
Larroche C. and Gros, J.B. 1989. Batch and continuous 2heptanone
production Caalginate/Eudrasit RL entrapped spores of
Penicillium roqueforti application to aroma production.
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34:3038.
LaVeck, G. 1991. Exposure Assessments of Microorganisms
Considered for 5(h)(4) Exemptions Under the Proposed Biotech
Rule. Unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Lee, Y.H., S.C. Fang and R.D. Wei. 1984. The Effects of
Penicillium roqueforti Toxin on the Activity of Rat Hepatic DNA
Polymerase. Toxicology 33:4357. (Abstract)(3)
Leistner, L. and C. Eckardt. 1979. Vorkommen toxinoger
Penicillien bei Fleischerzeugnissen Fleischwirtschaft
59:18921896 [Quoted by Scott, 1981].
Lieu, F.Y. and L.B. Bullerman. 1977. Production and Stability
of Aflatoxin, Penicillic Acid and Patulin in Several Substrates.
Jour. Food Science 42:12221224, 1228. [Quoted by Scott,
Marinari, R., R. Fleischmajer, A.H. Schragger and A.L. Rosenthal. 1977. Mycophenolic Acid in the Treatment of Psoriasis. Arch.
Mintzlaff, H.J. and W. Machnik. 1972. Untersuchungen über das
Toxinbildungsvermögen von Penicillium caseicolum and Penicillium
roquefortiStámmen, die für die Herstellung verschied ner
Kásesorten von Bedeutung sind. Bundesanstalt für Fleischforchung
in Kulmbach. Jahresbericht, Teil, I. pp. 5253 [Quoted by Scott,
Moreau, C. and M. Moss. 1979. Recent Developments in the Study
of Mycotoxins, pp. 286319. In: Moulds, Toxins and Food. C.
Moreaux and M. Moss, Eds. John Wiley and Sons Chichester, New
York, Brisbane, Toronto.
Moreau, C. 1980. Penicillium roqueforti: Morphology,
Physiology, Importance in the Cheesemaking. Mycotoxins:
(Bibliographic Revision). Lait 60:254271.
Moubasher, A.H., M.I.A. AbdelKader and I.A. ElKady. 1978.
Toxigenic Fungi Isolated from Roquefort Cheese. Mycopathologica
Moulé, Y., S. Moreaux and C. Aujard. 1980. Induction of Cross
Links between DNA and Protein by PRT Toxin, a Mycotoxin from
Penicillium roqueforti. Mutation Res. 77:7989.
Moulé, Y., M. Jemmali and N. Rousseau. 1976. Mechanism of the
Inhibition of Transcriptin by PR Toxin, a Mycotoxin from
Penicillium roqueforti. Chem. Biol. Interact. 14:207216.
Moulé, Y., C. Douce, S. Moreau and N. Darracq. 1981. Effects of
the Mycotoxin Botryodiplodin on Mammalian Cells in Culture.
Chem. Biol. Interact. 37:155164.
Moulé, Y., F. Renauld, N. Darracq and C. Douce. 1982.
DNAProtein CrossLinking by the Mycotoxin, Botryodiplodin, in
Mammalian Cells. Carcinogenesis (London) 3:211214.
Nagao, M., M. Honda, T. Yamazaki, S. Natori, Y. Ueno, M.
Yamasaki, Y. Seino, T. Yahagi and T. Sugimura. 1976. Proc. Jap.
Assoc. (3) Mycotoxicol. 4143. [Quoted by Scott, 1984].
Ohmomo, S., T. Sato, T. Utagawa and M. Abe. 1975. Isolation of
Festuclavine and Three New Indole Alkaloids, Roquefortine A, B
and C from the Cultures of Penicillium roqueforti (Production of
Alkaloids and Related Substances by Fungi Part XII) Jour. Agric.
Chem. Soc. Japan 49:615623.
Ohmomo, S., T. Utagawa and M. Abe. 1977. Identification of
Roquefortine C Produced by Penicillium roqueforti. Agric. Biol.
Olivigni, F.J. and Bullerman, L.B. 1978. Production of
Penicillic Acid and Patulin by an Atypical Penicillium roqueforti
Isolate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:435438. (Abstract)(3)
Orth, R. 1976. PR Toxinbildung bei Penicillium roqueforti.
Stämmen. Z. Lebensm. Unters.Forsch 160:131136. [Quoted by
Osswald H., H.K. Frank, D. Komitowski and H. Winter. 1978.
LongTerm Testing of Patulin Administered Orally in
SpragueDawley Rats and Swiss Mice. Food Cosmet. Toxicol.
Peberdy, J.F. 1985. Biology of Penicillium. pp. 407431. In: Biology of Industrial Microorganisms. Demain, A.L. and Solomon,
N.A., Eds. The Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., Inc. London;
Amsterdam; Don Mills, Ontario; Sydney; Tokyo.
Peterson S. 1990. In Kough, 1990.
Pitt, J.I. 1979. "The Genus Penicillium" Academic Press, London,
Planterose, D.N. 1969. Antiviral and Cytotoxic Effects of
Mycophenolic Acid. Jour. Gen. Virol. 4:629630.
Polonelli, I., G. Morace, F. Delle Monache and R.A. Samson.
1978. Studies on the PR Toxin of Penicillium roqueforti.
Polonelli, L., L. Lauriola and G. Morace. 1982. Preliminary
Studies on the Carcinogenic Effects of Penicillium roqueforti
Toxin. Mycopathologia 78:125127.
Polonsky, J., M.A. Merrien, T. Prangé, C. Pascard and S. Moreau. 1980. Isolation and Structure (XRay Analysis) of marcfortine A,
a new alkaloid from Penicillium roqueforti. Jour. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. 601602.
Raper, K.B. 1957. Nomenclature in Aspergillus and Penicillium.
Raper, K.B., Alexander D.F. and Coghill R.D. 1944. Penicillin.
11. Natural variation and penicillin production in Penicillium
notatum and allied species. J. Bacteriol. 48:639659.
Raper, K.B. and C.Thom. 1949. A Manual of the Penicillia.
Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD.
Raper, K.B., C. Thom and D.I. Fennell. 1968. In: A Manual of
the Penicillia, pp. 395401. Hafner Publishing Co., Inc., New
Samson, R.A., C. Eckardt and R. Orth. 1977. The Taxonomy of
Penicillium Species from Fermented Cheeses. A. van Leeuwenhoek
Jour. Microbiol. Serol. 43:341350.
Samson, R.A., and W. Gams. 1984. The Taxonomic Situation in the
Hyphomycete Genera Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Fusarium. Antonie
van Leeuwenhoek 50:815824.
Schoch, U., J. Luthy and C. Schlatter. 1983. Mycotoxins in
MoldRipened Cheese. Mitt Geb. Lebensmittelunters Hyg. 74:5059.
Schoch, U., J. Luthy and C. Schlatter. 1984. Subchronic
Toxicity Testing of MoldRipened Cheese. Z. Lebensm Unters
Forsch. 179:99103. (3)
Scott, P.M. 1977. Penicillium Mycotoxins pp. 283356. In:
Mycotoxic Fungi, Mycotoxins, Mycotoxicoses. T.D. Wyllie and
L.G. Morehouse, Eds. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Scott, P.M. 1981. Toxins of Penicillium Species Used in Cheese
Manufacture. Jour. of Food Protection 44:702710.
Scott, P.M. 1984. Roquefortine. In: MycotoxinsProduction,
Isolation, Separation and Purification. V. Betina, Ed. Elsevier
Science Publishers, B.V., Amsterdam.
Scott, P.M. and B.P.C. Kennedy. 1976. Analysis of Blue Cheese
for Roquefortine and Other Alkaloids from Penicillium roqueforti. Jour. Agric. Food Chem. 24:865868.
Scott, P.M., MA. Merrien and J. Polanky. 1976. Roquefortine
and Isofumigaclavine A, Metabolites from Penicillium roqueforti.
Scott, P.M., B.P.C. Kennedy, J. Harwig and B.J. Blanchfield.
1977. Study of Conditions for Production of Roquefortine and
Other Metabolites of Penicillium roqueforti. Appl. Environ.
Scott, P.R. and S.R. Kanhere. 1979. Instability of PR Toxin
Blue Cheese. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 62:141147.
Sharpell, F.H., Jr. 1985. Microbial flavors and fragrances. In:
Comprehensive Biotechnology. The Principle and applications, and
Regulations of Biotechnology in Industry, Agriculture, and(Eds.).
New York: Pergamon Press. pp. 965981.
Sieber, R. 1978. Harmlessness to Human Health of the Mold
Cultures Used in Cheesemaking. Z. Ernahrungswiss 17:112123.
Singh, L. 1990, In Kough, 1990.
Thom, C. 1910. Cultural Studies of Species of Penicillium.
Bull. Bur. Anim. Ind. U.S. Dept. Agric. 118:1109. [Quoted by
Samson et al., 1977] (3)
Ueno, Y., K. Kubota, T. Ito and Y. Nakamura. 1978. Mutagenicity
of Carcinogenic Mycotoxins in Salmonella typhimurium. Cancer
Research 38:536542. (3)
Ueno, Y. and I. Ueno. 1978. Toxicology and Biochemistry of
Mycotoxins (Chapter 3 see Table 3.26 Indole Mycotoxins,
p. 144), In: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Pathology of
Mycotoxins. K. Uraguchi and M. Yamazaki, Eds. Halstead Press,
Umeda, M., T. Tsutsui and M. Saito. 1977. Mutagenicity and
Inducibility of DNA SingleStranded Breaks and Chromosome
Aberrations by Various Mycotoxins. Gann 68:619625.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1986. Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules; Notice. 51 FR 1695816985.
Vesel, D., D. Veselá and Adamková. 1981. Occurrence of
PRToxinProducing Penicillium roqueforti in Corn Silage. Vet.
med. (Praha) 26:109115.
Wagener, R.E., N.D. Davis and U.L. Diener. 1980. Penitrim A and
Roquefortine Production by Penicillium commune. Appl. Environ.
Ware, G.M., C.W. Thorpe and A.E. Pohland. 1980. Determination
of Roquefortine in Blue Cheese and Blue Cheese Dressing by High
Pressure Liquid Chromatography with UV and Electrochemical
Detectors. Jour. Assoc. Off, Anal. Chem. 63:637641.
Webner, F.C., P.G. Thiel, S.J. van Rensburg and I.P.C. Demasius.
1978. Mutagenicity to Salmonella typhimurium of some Aspergillus
and Penicillium Mycotoxins. Mutation Research 58:193203.
Wei, R. and G. Liu. 1978. PR Toxin Production in Different
Penicillium roqueforti Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Wei, R., T. Ong, W. Whong, D. Frezza, G. Bronzetti and E. Zeiger. 1979. Environ. Mutagenesis 1:4553.
Wei, R., H.K. Schnoes, P.A. Hart and F.M. Strong. 1975. The
Structure of PR Toxin, a Mycotoxin from Penicillium roqueforti.
Wei, R., P.E. Still, E.B. Smalley, H.K. Schnoes and F.M. Strong,
1973. Isolation and Partial Characterization of a Mycotoxin from
Penicillium roqueforti. Appl. Microbio. 25:111114. (1)
Wei, R.D., Lee Y.H.W. and Wei, Y.H. 1985. Some biochemical
responses to PR toxin, a mycotoxin from Penicillium roqueforti.
In: Trichothecenes and other Mycotoxins. J. Lacey (ed.). New
York: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 337348.
Wei, YH, WH Ding and RD Wei. 1984. Biochemical Effects of
Penicillium roqueforti Toxin on Rat Liver Mitochondrial
Respiration and Oxidative Phosphorylation. Arch. Biochem.
Wilson, B.J. 1971. Miscellaneous Penicillium Toxins. pp. 459
521. In: Microbial Toxins. Vol. VI, A. Ciegler, S. Kadis and
S.J. Ail, Eds. Academic Press, Inc., New York.
B. Secondary Sources
(1)Kough, J. 1990. Environmental hazard assessment of Penicillium roqueforti for 5(h)(4) exemption. Unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
(2)Dynamac. 1990. Organism Profile: Penicillium roqueforti. Unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
(3)Dynamac. 1991. Human health effects of Penicillium roqueforti. Unpublished, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.