(i) ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES To establish that the defendant
had no reason to know of the matter described in subparagraph
(A)(i), the defendant must demonstrate to a court that
(I) on or before the date on which the defendant acquired the
facility, the defendant carried out all appropriate inquiries, as
provided in clauses (ii) and (iv), into the previous ownership and
uses of the facility in accordance with generally accepted good
commercial and customary standards and practices; and
(II) the defendant took reasonable steps to
(aa) stop any continuing release;
(bb) prevent any threatened future release; and
(cc) prevent or limit any human, environmental, or natural
resource exposure to any previously released hazardous substance.
(ii) STANDARDS AND PRACTICES Not later than 2 years after
the date of enactment of the Brownfields Revitalization and Environmental
Restoration Act of 2001, the Administrator shall by regulation
establish standards and practices for the purpose of satisfying
the requirement to carry out all appropriate inquiries under clause
(i).
(iii) CRITERIA In promulgating regulations that establish
the standards and practices referred to in clause (ii), the Administrator
shall include each of the following:
(I) The results of an inquiry by an environmental professional.
(II) Interviews with past and present owners, operators, and
occupants of the facility for the purpose of gathering information
regarding the potential for contamination at the facility.
(III) Reviews of historical sources, such as chain of title
documents, aerial photographs, building department records,
and land use records, to determine previous uses and occupancies
of the real property since the property was first developed.
(IV) Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens against
the facility that are filed under Federal, State, or local law.
(V) Reviews of Federal, State, and local government records,
waste disposal records, underground storage tank records, and
hazardous waste handling, generation, treatment, disposal, and
spill records, concerning contamination at or near the facility.
(VI) Visual inspections of the facility and of adjoining properties.
(VII) Specialized knowledge or experience on the part of the
defendant.
(VIII) The relationship of the purchase price to the value
of the property, if the property was not contaminated.
(IX) Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information
about the property.
(X) The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence
of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect
the contamination by appropriate investigation.