Jump to main content.


BP North America Settlement

BP North America Settlement Resources

"BP’s actions at the Texas City refinery have had terrible consequences for the people who work there and for those in nearby communities. Today's settlement, in conjunction with other actions already taken by EPA and other federal agencies at Texas City, demonstrates the agency's continuing commitment to actively and vigorously working to hold BP accountable and to make them comply with our nation’s environmental protection laws wherever the company operates." - Cynthia Giles, Assistant Administrator of EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance and Assurance.

(Washington, DC - Sept. 30, 2010) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Justice Department announced today that BP Products North America Inc. has agreed to pay a $15 million penalty to resolve federal Clean Air Act violations at its Texas City, Texas petroleum refinery. The penalty is both the largest ever assessed for civil violations of the Clean Air Act’s chemical accident prevention regulations, also known as the risk management program regulations, and the largest civil penalty recovered for Clean Air Act violations at an individual facility.

On this page:

Overview of Companies and Location of Facilities

BP Products North America, Inc. engages in the exploration, development, production, refining, and marketing of oil and natural gas.  BP Products North America, Inc., which operates as a subsidiary of BP plc., is based in Warrenville, Ill. with additional offices in Chicago and Houston.  With annual revenues of $239 billion and operations in more than 30 countries, BP employs approximately 2,000 employees at the Texas City, Texas facility, which is the third largest refinery in the United States.

Top of Page

Violations

Top of Page

Injunctive Relief

In 2005, BP agreed to implement significant operational changes in a settlement with OSHA for violations of the Process Safety Management (PSM) regulations.  BP’s settlement with EPA for CAA Section 112(r) General Duty Clause violations complements this earlier OSHA agreement and requires additional process and safety changes including increased reporting on incidents which resulted, or could have resulted, in catastrophic releases of regulated substances.  The Consent Decree requires BP to regularly prepare and submit the following to EPA:

These reporting requirements were selected for EPA review due to their relationship to the past incidents and a review of a third-party PSM audit conducted as a result of the OSHA settlement.

Top of page

Health and Environmental Effects

BP’s enhanced 112(r)/RMP compliance activities in regard to managing risk at its facility will reduce the likelihood that a catastrophic release will occur. If one should occur, these compliance activities will minimize the consequences of such a release.

Top of Page

Civil Penalty

BP will pay a $15 million penalty to the United States.

Top of page

Comment Period

The proposed settlement, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, is subject to a 30-day public comment period and final court approval. Information on submitting comments is available at the Department of Justice website.

Top of page

For more information, contact:

Dean Ziegel
U.S. EPA
Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington DC 20460
(202) 564-4038
ziegel.dean@epa.gov

Evan Pearson
U.S. EPA Region 6 (Mail Code: 6RC)
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
(214) 665-8074
pearson.evan@epa.gov

Top of Page

Related Actions

EPA Clean Air Act Settlement Information (2009)

EPA criminal enforcement action (2007)

U.S. Chemical Safety Board Investigation Report (2007)

Occupational Health and Safety Administration Settlement Agreements (OSHA)

Top of Page

 

 

 

 

 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.