• About Us
  • What is DfE?
  • Quienes Somos? (Spanish)
  • Safer Product Labeling
  • DfE's Alternatives
    Assessments Program
  • DfE Stakeholder Groups
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • DfE on Facebook!
• About the DfE Label
  • Why Look for the Label?
  • Which Products Have
    the DfE Label?
  • DfE Standard for Cleaning Products
• Earn the DfE Label
  • What Does the DfE Label Mean?
  • How to Partner, Get the
    DfE Label
  • DfE Criteria for Safer
    Chemical Ingredients
  • DfE Antimicrobial Pesticide
    Pilot Project
• Labeled Products
  • For Consumers
  • For Industrial & Institutional
    Purchasers
• DfE Projects
  • DfE's Alternatives Assessments
    Program
  • BPA in Thermal Paper
  • Flame Retardant Alternatives
    to decaBDE
  • Flame Retardant Alternatives
    for Hexabromocyclododecane
    (HBCD)
  • Flame Retardants in Circuit
    Boards
  • Nonylphenol Ethoxylate (NPE)
    Surfactants
  • Alternatives to Certain Phthalates
  • DfE's Life-Cycle Assessment
    Program
  • Lithium-ion Batteries &
    Nanotechnology
  • Safer Detergents Stewardship
    Initiative
  • DfE's Best Practices Partnerships
• Resources
  • Publications
  • CleanGredients® (database
    of safer ingredients)

 

Gravure Printing Findings & Accomplishments

Gravure Printing Home | About This Project | Findings & Accomplishments | Publications | Partners

Key risk reduction opportunities identified by the DfE Gravure Printing Partnership include:

• Reduction in volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from floor cleaning and press operations.
  
• Reduction in hazardous waste generation.
  
• Cleaner and safer shop towel management.

Because packaging and product gravure printers are particularly concerned about solvent losses from ink during press operations, the partnership performed a preliminary study of the effect of ink temperature on solvent losses and print quality.

The study indicated that printers might be able to reduce solvent consumption, improve print quality, and achieve cost savings by implementing ink temperature controls.

The Gravure Printing Partnership challenges the industry to confirm study findings and optimize printing operations. For example, gravure printers could:

• Independently evaluate the effects of ink temperature on solvent and ink consumption, print quality, and cost.
  
• Assess and/or optimize current ink temperature control options, including:
  • Submerged copper coils in the ink sump, including the cost and pollution implications of frequent cleaning.
  • In-line heat exchangers on the supply chain.
  • Room temperature control (air conditioning).
• Adapt a temperature control option from another industry.
  
• Develop a new, innovative method for controlling ink temperatures.

back to top