Sport Fish Fillet Monitoring Program
Contact Information
For further information on the Great Lakes Fish Monitoring and Surveillance Program, please contact:
Elizabeth Murphy (murphy.elizabeth@epa.gov)
Environmental Scientist
EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
(312) 353-4227 or 1-800-621-8431 x34227
Access the Data
Data produced by the GLFMSP can be obtained through the Great Lakes Environmental Database Query System or through the University of Illinois Extension website ![]()
You can also contact the program manager, Elizabeth Murphy, for information regarding the GLFMSP and/or supporting data.
Peer reviewed journal articles published using GLFMSP data can also be found on the Reports & Links page.
This component of the Great Lakes Fish Monitoring and surveillance Program was eliminated in 2008 to allow for the Emerging Chemical Surveillance Program. It was directed at monitoring potential human exposure to contaminants through consumption of popular sport fish species in the Great Lakes Basin. The program provided for the collection of skin-on fillets from Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) or Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) salmon in Lakes Michigan, Superior, Ontario, and Huron and for rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in Lake Erie. The inclusion of Coho and Chinook salmon in this program provided a snapshot of contaminant concentrations across the Great Lakes in fish of consistent age, complementing the existing size-based data collected in the Open Lakes Trend Monitoring Program. Fish samples were then composited and analyzed for contaminants, including PCBs, toxaphene, chlordanes, PBDEs and other organochlorine compounds. All samples collected for this program have been archived and may be available for additional research. All data produced is available through the Great Lakes Environmental Database.
Information gained from the Sport Fish Fillet monitoring program cannot be used to determine trends in contaminants and cannot be used to set fish advisories. All eight Great Lakes states and the Great Lakes tribes issue their own fish consumption advice. PCB concentrations in coho salmon from this program can be compared to a standardized fish advisory protocol, the Protocol for a Uniform Great Lakes Sport Fish Consumption Advisory
, developed by the eight Great Lakes states to assess potential human exposure to PCBs through sport fish consumption. Although not intended as fish consumption advice, information from this program can assess the extent to which PCBs accumulate in coho salmon tissue in each of the Great Lakes.
Samples are no longer analyzed for this program; however, the EPA maintains a historical archive of these fish samples that may be utilized for historical information on chemicals like emerging contaminants.
Data
All Great Lakes Fish Monitoring and Surveillance Program (GLFMSP) data can be accessed through EPA's Great Lakes Environmental Database or by contacting the program manager, Elizabeth Murphy.
Summary Data tables of the last year of data for this element of the GLFMSP are provided here. When possible, chemical concentrations are compared to relevant benchmarks. Reference to the GLWQA below refers to the benchmarks identified in the 1987 amendment to the 1972 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
| Lake Superior | Species | Year | Contaminant | Mean Conc. (ppb) | 95% CI | Target | |
| Pike Creek | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 127.75 | 1.43 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 34.09 | 2.06 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 25.93 | 3.74 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 29.18 | 2.20 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Total Toxaphene | 100.47 | 4.65 | 235 ppb | OMOE | |||
| Mercury | 5.78 | 1.30 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 6.17 | 1.19 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 3.24 | 1.14 | |||||
| French River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 127.75 | 1.43 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 46.09 | 8.48 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 25.93 | 3.74 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 35.85 | 7.25 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Total Toxaphene | 119.75 | 28.95 | 235 ppb | OMOE | |||
| Mercury | 212.81 | 36.30 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 5.78 | 1.30 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 3.24 | 1.36 | |||||
| Lake Huron | Species | Contaminant | Mean Conc. (ppb) | 95% CI | Target | ||
| Black River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 252.32 | 25.70 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 74.56 | 10.90 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 19.79 | 3.53 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 22.15 | 5.94 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 163.80 | 42.29 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 1.74 | 0.75 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.70 | 0.49 | |||||
| Swan River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 259.05 | 56.34 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 67.11 | 18.87 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 15.58 | 7.10 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 19.19 | 5.74 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 154.74 | 36.07 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 1.72 | 0.66 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.60 | 0.87 | |||||
| Lake Ontario | Species | Contaminant | Mean Conc. (ppb) | 95% CI | Target | ||
| Salmon River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 422.43 | 73.32 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 130.22 | 19.41 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 39.92 | 7.69 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 20.31 | 4.95 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mirex | 19.25 | 4.67 | 235 ppb | OMOE | |||
| Mercury | 252.72 | 11.69 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 0.99 | 0.52 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 0.56 | 0.23 | |||||
| Lake Erie | Species | Contaminant | Mean Conc. (ppb) | 95% CI | Target | ||
| Salmon River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 296.15 | 44.68 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 35.12 | 5.19 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 8.18 | 1.14 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 9.49 | 1.41 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 129.09 | 9.60 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 4.24 | 0.30 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 7.21 | 1.78 | |||||
| Lake Michigan | Species | Contaminant | Mean Conc. (ppb) | 95% CI | Target | ||
| St. Joseph River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 154.68 | 9.53 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 46.23 | 6.68 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 11.34 | 0.94 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 12.41 | 1.59 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 222.30 | 33.29 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 1.12 | 0.25 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 0.53 | 0.20 | |||||
| Platt River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 222.17 | 73.80 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 69.15 | 25.50 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 14.73 | 5.16 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 14.99 | 4.87 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 184.03 | 48.15 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 1.25 | 1.12 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.20 | 1.37 | |||||
| Grand River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 309.41 | 116.09 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 95.36 | 36.10 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 22.33 | 9.02 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 26.73 | 8.96 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 210.26 | 40.98 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 2.99 | 1.49 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.69 | 1.28 | |||||
| Cook County, IL | Coho Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 314.59 | 102.66 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 90.05 | 22.35 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 22.22 | 8.09 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 23.11 | 5.50 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 152.74 | 70.84 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 3.00 | 1.60 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.74 | 0.73 | |||||
| Root River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 556.36 | 120.29 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 156.22 | 59.80 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 37.00 | 13.06 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 47.48 | 21.72 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 214.98 | 52.20 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 5.25 | 1.06 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.74 | 0.26 | |||||
| Kewaunee River | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 475.81 | 86.70 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 140.50 | 34.89 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 31.88 | 7.72 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 40.66 | 12.46 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 192.86 | 28.42 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 4.10 | 1.42 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.71 | 0.41 | |||||
| Trail Creek | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 302.27 | 33.27 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 90.98 | 23.40 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 20.65 | 3.29 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 25.75 | 2.59 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 220.26 | 41.14 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 2.20 | 0.67 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 0.95 | 0.13 | |||||
| Thompson Creek | Chinook Salmon | 2007 | Total PCB | 337.11 | 112.36 | 50 ppb | Protocol |
| Total DDT | 83.41 | 30.54 | |||||
| Total PBDE | 19.93 | 8.50 | |||||
| Total Chlordane | 24.67 | 9.65 | 150 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Mercury | 178.10 | 34.90 | 50 ppb | Protocol | |||
| Dieldrin | 2.70 | 1.23 | 300 ppb | GLWQA | |||
| Lipid | 1.77 | 1.15 | |||||
GLFMSP publications on contaminants in sport fish:
- De Vault, D.S., and Weishaar, J. A., 1983. Contaminant analysis of 1981 fall run coho salmon (Onchorhynchus kisutch). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 905/3-83-001. Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago, Illinois.
- De Vault, D.S., and Weishaar, J. A., 1984. Contaminant analysis of 1982 fall run coho salmon (Onchorhynchus kisutch). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 905/3-84-004. Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago, Illinois.
- Clark, J.R., De Vault, D.S., Bowden, R.J., and Weishaar, J.A. 1984. Contaminant analysis of fall run coho salmon. J. Great Lakes Res. 10:38 - 47
- De Vault, D. S., 1985. Contaminants in Fish from Great Lakes Harbors and Tributary Mouths. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicology. 14: 587 – 594.
- De Vault, D.S., Clark, J.M., Lahvis, G., Weishaar, J. 1988. Contaminants and Trends in Fall Run Coho Salmon. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 14(1): 23-33.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)