Request for Applications
R5-GL2008-3
- Send us your
Questions and comments - Answers to your questions
(Updated periodically) - Request for Applications
[PDF, 26 pages, 98KB] - Application
Forms
(available through GLNPO or through grants.gov) - Subscribe to our mail list, GreatLakesNews to receive funding information via email
Answers to your questions about Request for Applications: Lake Priorities
Return to the Request for Applications
Q.1. How many applications do you expect to receive in
response to this solicitation? Is this program particularly
competitive?
A.1. We expect to make 8-12 awards. We do not know what to
expect. In the past, the success rate for general solicitations
has been around 25%; however, that may not be indicative of the
success rate for this more targeted solicitation.
Q.2. Could you confirm that applications must be received by
midnight or postmarked by June 10 to be eligible?
A.2. See Section IV.E of the Announcement. Application packages,
regardless of the mode of submission, must be postmarked or
received by EPA or through grants.gov by midnight, Central
Standard Time, June 10, 2008.
Q.3. I understand that matching funds are not required but
considered in the review process; how much in matching funds are
you looking for when these types of funds are offered? The more
match, the better? Is there a preference for cash or in-kind
contributions?
A.3. There is no set amount. Match is a possible component of
collaboration and leveraging, which will be evaluated as
described in Section V.F. of the Announcement. An applicant can
get full credit under this criteria by demonstrating
collaboration and leveraging, even without match. Many awards
are likely to be issued without any match at all. There is not a
preference between cash and in-kind contributions.
Q.4. Out of the various eligible entities listed on page 9 of
the RFP, which ones usually apply and are successful?
A.4. All of the various eligible entities so listed have applied
and have been successful.
Q.5. Why is there funding for Lakes Michigan,
Huron, Superior, and Ontario, but not Erie?
A.5. During the past year GLNPO has made funding
available throughout the Great Lakes basin, including Lake Erie, in several
offerings, including project agreements pursuant to the Great Lakes Legacy
Act and grant offerings through the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation's
Watershed Restoration Program, the Great Lakes Collections of Household
Unwanted Electronics and Medicines announcement, and the outstanding
Pollution Prevention and Reduction offering which also closes on June 10.
GLNPO has in recent years funded several projects unique to Lake Erie as
part of the exploration of the Lake Erie dead zone, including a grant which
focused on Lake Erie loadings information. Additional funding is not
offered for that work now because GLNPO already funded it. Complementary
work is now being funded from other sources. Finally, GLNPO funds much of
the other priority Lake Erie work through non-competitive grants with the
States of Ohio and Pennsylvania. For this year, GLNPO has determined that
such non-competitive State grants are the most effective and efficient way
to fund the priorities identified in the Lake Erie Lakewide Management Plan
and Remedial Action Plans for Lake Erie and its Areas of Concern.
Q.6. Do you intend for disposal and collection to
be part of your Education/Outreach criteria in Section V.G?
A.6. No. We plan to amend the Request for Applications to fix this.
Criteria V.G. will read as follows:
G. Education/Outreach: Effectiveness of education/outreach and plans to
disseminate project results. (10 points for Topics I.A. and B. 0 points for
Topics I.C. and D.)
Q.7. Where can I find more information on the web about
the Great Lakes Index?
A.7. Information about the Index is included in the quality
description accompanying the Agency's FY07 annual performance report (see
page 127 of the document at:
http://www.epa.gov/ocfopage/par/2007par/par07appendix_b_details.pdf ).
Chapter 7 of the 2007 Coastal Conditions Report (at
http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/nccr/2005/Chap7_GreatLakes.pdf) includes
additional background information, although that report includes a "water
quality index" that is not a part of the Great Lakes Index.
Lake Michigan
Michigan Q.1. What is your definition of Green Infrastructure? Green
Infrastructure can mean hubs, sites and links on a regional or watershed
scale, or it can mean earth/water friendly technology such as green roofs,
rain gardens, and bio-swales. In some cases it can mean both. Any
clarification would be helpful.
Michigan A.1. The Request for Applications calls for
projects "advancing the work of the Lake Michigan LaMP." Reference to US
EPA's Green Infrastructure Policy can be found on page 9 of Chapter 6 of the
Lake Michigan LaMP 2008
( www.epa.gov/glnpo/michigan.html ). The Policy is also available at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/greeninfrastructure
(Green infrastructure facilitates or mimics natural processess that also
recharge groundwate, preserve base flows, moderate temperature impacts, and
protect hydrologicalic stability.)
Michigan Q.2. What are your expectations regarding tool development? $75K
doesn't go that far these days, and to create a good web-based tool requires
a lot of expertise, time, and resources. Do you expect the tool to be a
software
program on a CD, s user-friendly web-based tool, or something like a hard
copy booklet with checkboxes?
Michigan A.2. The Request for Applications calls for
projects "advancing the work of the Lake Michigan LaMP." Pursuant to the
Request for Applications and the Lake Michigan LaMP, any of the tools you
have referenced would be eligible, as would existing tools which could also
be further developed or leveraged through the addition of training and
networking of communities for distribution.
Michigan Q.3. Do you envision the training and tool development to apply just
to coastal communities, or do you envision that they apply to all
communities within the Lake Michigan watershed?
Michigan A.3. The Request for Applications calls for projects "advancing the
work of the Lake Michigan LaMP." Since the Lake Michigan LaMP is applicable
to all communities within the Lake Michigan watershed, optimal training and
tool development would be applicable for all basin local
government/communities.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)