![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Conformity Adequacy Review - Region 10
Transportation
Conformity
- Main Transportation Conformity Page
- General Information
- Policy Guidance
- Training Materials
- Regulations
- Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions
- Regional Contacts
NOTE: You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.
SIP Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
This page provides a list of state implementation plans that include motor vehicle emission budgets that EPA Region 10 has found either adequate or inadequate for the purposes of transportation conformity.
Contact: Wayne Elson, U.S. EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101; phone: (206) 553-1463. email: elson.wayne@epa.gov.
| Alaska | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Anchorage | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (07/23/04) FR Notice (PDF, 54K) |
SIP found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (10/18/02) FR Notice (PDF, 39K) |
Budgets adequate by virtue of SIP approval. | ||
| Inadequate (05/14/99) |
Determination made under old process. | |||
| Fairbanks | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/27/04) Direct FR Notice (PDF, 76K) |
Budgets adequate by virtue of SIP approval. |
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (04/05/02) FR Notice (PDF, 58K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | ||
| Inadequate (05/14/99) |
Determination made under old process | |||
| Idaho | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Northern Ada County | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (12/27/03) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Pocatello | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (10/04/04) Letter (PDF, 387K) FR Notice (PDF, 49K) |
Budgets found adequate through adequacy review process. |
| attainment demonstration | Inadequate (08/14/00) Letter (PDF, 19K) FR Notice (PDF, 127KB) |
|||
| Oregon | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Medford | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/18/06) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (04/26/02) Letter (PDF, 15K) FR Notice (PDF, 39K) |
Budgets found adequate through adequacy review process. | |
| Portland | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (02/23/06) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Washington | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Spokane | PM10 | limitedmaintenance plan | Adequate (08/30/05) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/29/05) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (12/04/02) Letter (PDF, 16K) FR Notice (PDF, 40K) |
Budgets found adequate through adequacy review process. | ||
| Inadequate (05/14/99) |
Determination made under old process | |||
| Vancouver | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (12/04/07) Letter (PDF, 2 pp., 29K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through adequacy review process. |
| Yakima | PM10 | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (11/29/04) Letter (PDF, 90K) FR Noticeor (PDF, 33K) |
Budgets found adequate through adequacy review process. |
| carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (12/31/03) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |