State and Local Transportation Resources
Conformity Adequacy Review - Region 4
Transportation
Conformity
- Main Transportation Conformity Page
- General Information
- Policy Guidance
- Training Materials
- Regulations
- Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions
- Regional Contacts
NOTE: You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.
SIP Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
Contact: Dianna Smith at 404-562-9207 or smith.dianna@epa.gov.
U.S. EPA Region 4, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division, 61 Forsyth St. S.W., Atlanta, GA 30303.
| Alabama | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Birmingham | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (03/10/06) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 56K) FR Notice (PDF) (1 p, 49K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (03/12/04) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process | |
| Adequate (06/22/01) Letter (PDF), (1 p, 10K) FR Notice |
Response to public comment (PDF), (6 pp. 88K). Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
| Jackson County | pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (07/06/10) Letter (PDF), (2 pp, 75K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Florida | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Jacksonville | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/22/03) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Southeast Florida (Broward, Dade, and Palm Beach counties) |
1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (04/13/04) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
| Tampa | 1-hour ozone |
maintenance plan |
Adequate (05/28/04) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Georgia | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Atlanta | 8-hour ozone | early progress SIP | Adequate (04/24/07) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/15/05) FR Notice |
Budget found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| rate of progress | Adequate (07/19/04) FR Notice |
Budget found adequate through SIP approval process. | ||
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (01/23/02) Letter (PDF) ( 1 p, 18K) FR Notice |
Response to Public Comment (PDF) ( 23 pp, 59K). Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review. | ||
| Withdrawal of adequacy finding FR Notice |
Effective date of withdrawal 01/26/01 | |||
| Adequate (05/12/00) Letter (PDF) ( 1 p 8K) FR Notice |
Response to Public Comment (PDF) (6 pp, 33K). Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |||
| State withdrew SIP that was posted on 06/08/99. | SIP resubmitted to EPA; posted to website on 11/03/99 | |||
| Macon | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/19/07) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Murray County | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (10/16/07) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Kentucky | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Boyd County | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/03/07) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Christian County (Clarksville-Hopkins Area) | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/25/06) FR Notice (PDF) (4 pp, 62K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Cincinnati - Hamilton (IN - KY - OH) | pm2.5 | maintenance plan | Adequate (12/15/11) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| attainment plan | Withdrawn (09/30/11) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 85K) |
|||
| 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/05/10) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| 8-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (05/13/08) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 81K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Edmonson County | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Withdrawn (10/24/07) Letter (PDF) (1 p, 35K) |
|
| Huntington-Ashland | pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (07/06/10) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 70K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Withdrawn (10/24/07) Letter (PDF) (1 p, 35K) |
||
| Lexington | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/16/04) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Louisville | pm2.5 | attainment plan | Withdrawn (09/30/11) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 64K) |
|
| 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (07/05/07) (Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 72K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
| 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan (MOBILE6 Revision) | Adequate (08/22/03) (Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 80K) FR Notice |
Response to Comments (PDF) (5 pp, 59K). Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| maintenance plan | Adequate (10/23/01) FR Notice |
Budget adequate by virtue of maintenance plan approval. | ||
| attainment demonstration | Inadequate (05/19/01) Letter (PDF, 2 pp, 371K) FR Notice |
|||
| 15% | Adequate (04/29/99) |
Determination made under old process | ||
| Northern Kentucky | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (07/14/00) Letter (PDF) (4 pp, 42K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| North Carolina | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Charlotte | 8-hour ozone | reasonable further progress plan | Adequate (03/08/10) Letter (PDF) (2 pp 58K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Withdrawn | RFP plan (insignifcance) replaced with VOC budgets. New adequacy review started on 12/03/09 | |||
| attainment plan | Withdrawn (02/10/12) Letter (PDF) (1 p, t17K) | |||
| Withdrawn (12/19/08) Letter (PDF) (3 pp, 137K) | ||||
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (05/23/05) Letter (PDF) (3 pp 37K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Great Smoky Mountain National Park | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (12/07/09) FR Notice (PDF) (5 pp, 60K) |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
| Greensboro - Winston - Salem - Highpoint | pm2.5 | maintenance plan | Adequate (05/17/11) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 64K FR Notice (PDF) |
Budgets found adequate through the the adequacy review process. |
| attainment plan | Withdrawn Letter (PDF) (1 pp, 517K |
Replaced by the maintenance plan. | ||
| Hickory | pm2.5 | maintenance plan | Adequate (05/17/11) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 109K) FR Notice (PDF) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| attainment plan | Adequate (03/16/10) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 82K) FR Notice FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| Raleigh - Durham and Chapel Hill | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (12/26/07) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
| Raleigh - Durham and Greensboro - Winston-Salem - High Point |
1-hour ozone | maintenance plans | Adequate (08/09/04) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 20K) Enclosure (PDF) (1 p, 16K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Rocky Mount | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plans | Adequate (01/05/07) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| South Carolina | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Charlotte (York County) |
8-hour ozone | reasonable further progress plan | Adequate (06/21/12) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 78K) FR Notice |
Response to Comments (PDF) (4 pp, 134K) Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Revised | In December 2009 EPA requested additional information regarding the reasonable further progress plan. The revised budgets were provided in the May 5, 2010 SIP submission and posted for adequacy review on May 13, 2010. | |||
| attainment plan | Withdrawn (01/12/12) Letter (PDF) (3 pp, 1.7M) | |||
| Withdrawn (12/19/08) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 156K) | ||||
| Cherokee | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/25/02) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Tennessee | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Knoxville | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/30/10) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 58K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (04/22/10) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 70K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Withdrawn (02/10/09) Letter (PDF) (1 p, 35K) |
Posted for adequacy on 03/06/07. | |
| 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (04/02/04) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process | |
| Memphis | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/07/99) |
Determination made under old process |
| Memphis/Shelby County | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plans | Adequate (11/27/2009) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plans | Adequate (10/25/06) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| Montgomery County | 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (11/21/05) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
| Nashville (Middle Tennessee) | 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (10/03/05) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 1.6M) FR Notice (PDF) (2 pp, 82K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |