![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Conformity Adequacy Review - Region 6
Transportation
Conformity
- Main Transportation Conformity Page
- General Information
- Policy Guidance
- Training Materials
- Regulations
- Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions
- Regional Contacts
NOTE: You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.
SIP Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 6: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
Contact: Jeff Riley, U.S. EPA Region 6, Fountain Place 12th Floor, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733; phone: (214) 665-8542, fax: (214) 665-7263 or email: riley.jeffrey@epa.gov
| Louisiana | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding) (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Baton Rouge | 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (06/17/03) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 10K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 39K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| attainment demonstration (2005 budgets) | Adequate (08/01/02) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 9K) FR Notice | (PDF Version, (2pp. 14K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (04/28/99) |
Determination made under old process | ||
| New Mexico | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding) (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Albuquerque | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (06/13/05) FR Notice (PDF), 2 pp, 78K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| maintenance plan | Adequate (08/21/03) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 12K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 40K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| Texas | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Beaumont - Port Arthur | 1-hour ozone | post-96 rate of progress | Adequate (04/24/06) FR Notice | PDF Version, (4 pp, 66K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| attainment demonstration | Adequate (11/06/00) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 12K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 20K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| Dallas/Fort Worth | 8-hour ozone | attainment plan and reasonable further progress plan | Adequate (04/07/08) Letter (PDF), (2pp 78K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp 56K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| 5% increment of progress | Adequate
(06/16/05)
Letter (PDF), (2pp. 92K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (1p. 48K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (11/06/00) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 12K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 20K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| post-96 rate of progress | Adequate (01/27/00) Letter (PDF), (38K) FR Notice or PDF Version, (2pp. 123K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
| attainment demonstration, post-96 rate of progress | Failure to submit (06/02/99) FR Notice | PDF Version, (4pp. 33K) |
Explanation | ||
| El Paso | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequacy finding withdrawn (03/26/07) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 87K) |
Effective date of withdrawal is March 26, 2007. |
| carbon monoxide | section 179B international border plan | Adequate (11/01/99) Letter (PDF), (2pp 10K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 20K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| 1-hour ozone | section 179B international border plan | Adequate (01/12/98) |
Determination made under old process | |
| Houston - Galveston - Brazoria | 8-hour ozone | reasonable further progress plan | Adequate (04/07/08) Letter (PDF), (2pp 78K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp 56K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Houston | 1-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate
(5/9/05) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 90K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 52K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| attainment demonstration and post-99 rate of progress | Adequate (11/14/01) FR Notice | PDF Version, (38pp. 266K) |
Budgets found adequate at the time of SIP approval; budgets replace those submitted on 12/20/00. | ||
| attainment demonstration | Inadequate (05/09/01) Letter (PDF), 2pp. 106K) FR Notice | PDF Version, 2pp. 38K) |
|||
| Adequate (06/29/00) Letter (PDF), 3pp. 14K) FR Notice |
Response to Comments (PDF), (16pp. 73K). Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
| Inadequate (11/23/99) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 15K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (1p. 6K) |
Houston submitted new ozone attainment demonstration (posted 11/29/99) | |||
| post-96 rate of progress | Adequate (11/01/99) Letter (PDF), (2pp. 38K) FR Notice | PDF Version, (2pp. 20K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||