Watersheds 319 Grants
| Name |
Description |
State |
Award year |
| Implementation of the Nonpoint Source Components of TMDLs and Watershed-Based Management Plans
|
This project will provide Section 319 incremental grant funding to develop and implement the nonpoint source components of TMDL/watershed-based management plans that incorporate Section 319 grant guideline “a-i” watershed plan elements. This project serves as a “planning tool” for the state to efficiently allocate grant funding to address NPS water quality issues, to identify and cooperate with stakeholders, target priority watersheds, and provide voluntary incentive-based management solutions. This project will speed implementation of the NPS components of TMDLs and NPS watershed plans and restore impaired waters on Section 303(d) lists. Funding will also be used to develop additional future Section 319 grant year proposals and watershed plans. As stakeholders express an interest in developing and implementing watershed management plans, Section 319 funding may then be provided through this project if the plans target specific nonpoint source pollution sources and causes, and state water quality standards and use classifications.
|
Alabama |
2008 |
| Nonpoint Source Management Program Flexibility for Emerging Issues
|
Partnering with stakeholders to develop and implement nonpoint source management programs and activities makes good environmental, financial, social, and administrative sense. A holistic approach strengthens public and private sector efforts at the federal, state, and local levels and achieves the greatest environmental protection benefits. The ADEM continues to place great emphasis on assuring that Section 319 grant funds are used efficiently and effectively to address nonpoint source management program goals and objectives. This project is designed to provide resources to address unanticipated, emerging, previously unaddressed, or inadequately addressed NPS concerns and issues. It will then provide resources to implement environmentally-protective and economically-feasible management practices in a coordinated and timely manner. Although previous Section 319 workplans, watershed-based management plans, and other stakeholder efforts have attempted to provide a focused and iterative approach to known NPS issues and concerns, oftentimes unexpected problems arise that necessitate immediate management measure action or attention. However, because of prior commitments of limited available funds, the newly emerging impairment or situation is often made worse by lack of resources to timely and properly address it; and water quality and environmental health continues to unnecessarily degrade.
|
Alabama |
2008
|
| Rotational River Basin Approach: Surface Water Quality Assessment of the Tennessee River Basin
|
|
Alabama
|
2008 |
| Surface Water Quality Screening Assessment of Rivers, Reservoirs, and Tributary Embayments of the Tennessee River Basin and Water Quality Assessment of Alabama Reservoirs for Nutrient Criteria and Total Maximum Daily Loads
|
|
Alabama |
2008 |
| Watershed-Based Plan Implementation Effectiveness |
This project will target the nonpoint source components of watershed-based plans in selected watersheds throughout Alabama. Information specific to water quality (e.g. physical, chemical, biological parameters), nutrient criteria, habitats, index of biotic integrity, ecoregions, large scope and scale river basins/subbasins, smaller scope and scale watersheds, project or site specific areas, or particular best management practices, may be obtained to aid in the development or implementation of watershed-based plans, to document pre-or post-best management practice implementation status, ascertain the cumulative effectiveness of implemented TMDL/nonpoint source practices, and to report NPS pollutant load reductions. Data will also be used to provide information critical to incorporation of the “a-i” watershed plan components as presented in Section 319 grant guidelines. This project will also be useful in assessing the types and numbers of management practices needed to protect threatened or unimpaired watersheds.
|
Alabama |
2008 |
| C-7 Watershed Education Program
|
The Coordinator’s main responsibilities will be: a) the planning and implementation of our annual hands-on riverside environmental education program for fourth-graders throughout the Haw River watershed; b) helping organize our major outreach/volunteer programs for the public; and c) expanding educational work with schools, including a new stream monitoring program for middle schools.
The goals of our Watershed Education program are:
--Educating 1500 children each year, from public, private, and home schools in the Haw River watershed, about stream ecology, pollution and stormwater issues, and stream stewardship principles, at the Haw River Learning Celebration; and providing continuing educational tools throughout the year.
--Educating the public, including those who volunteer with us, about pollution issues, including stormwater and sediment, and solutions, through our river cleanups, riparian enhancement projects, the annual Haw River Festival, and our use of the hands-on “watershed model” to educate the public at fairs, colleges, community presentations, and other public outreach events.
--Launching a new program at seven middle schools (in Guilford, Rockingham, Alamance, Chatham, Orange, Wake and Durham counties) to train teachers and students to monitor a stream that is on-site (or adjacent) for basic chemical and biological health indicators, as well as assessing turbidity, algae, and overall stream and riparian buffer conditions. This new initiative will be guided by the Haw River Assembly’s River Watch project coordinator who heads up our stream monitoring work with volunteer teams that have been gathering data in the watershed since 1995. |
North Carolina |
2008
|
| I-10 Collaborative Restoration and Protection of High Quality Resources in Tick Creek and Rocky River Watersheds
|
The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program completed a local watershed assessment and targeting of restoration plan in 2005 for this subbasin, but they are not currently pursuing implementation of any projects. Some separate watershed protection and restoration efforts are underway by various parties. The County supports a coordinated effort to revisit the NCEEP plan, invite all affected parties to share efforts and data, review EEP report’s methodology, prioritize projects, and identify information gaps, monitoring needs, and funding. We propose a two prong approach- to convene and coordinate a Rocky River watershed effort, and to focus immediate restoration efforts on Tick Creek, a rural watershed dominated by agricultural land use. The effort will include compiling a geodatabase to update land use data and indicators for the watershed, and to evaluate Tick Creek past and projected land use changes.
|
North Carolina
|
2008
|
| I-2 Dan River Watershed BMP's
|
The primary objective of this project is to implement best management practices (BMPs) throughout the Dan River Watershed to address water quality issues and restore waters not meeting state standards. The BMPs listed in this proposal will directly reduce sediment delivery and fecal coliform bacteria to the impaired waters. Other benefits can be expected as well since many of the proposed BMPs will prevent off-site movement of pesticides, phosphorus, and nitrogen. Improvements in streambank stability and habitat for fish and macroinvertebrates will also be realized. The Dan River is listed on North Carolina’s Draft 2008-303(d) list and approved 2006 303(d) list because of high levels of turbidity and fecal coliform bacteria. Erosion and sedimentation from agriculture has been identified as a potential source. The overall goal of this project is restoring full uses to the Dan River.
|
North Carolina
|
2008 |
| I-5 Delineating Agriculture in the Neuse River Basin
|
Change in agricultural activity is essential to protect water resources in the Neuse Estuary. We will provide field-scale data consisting of information on animal numbers, nutrient management, agricultural crops, soil erosion losses, soil test phosphorus levels and best management practices by conducting a survey of agricultural producers in the Neuse River Basin during the fall of 2008 or 2009. Field samples will be drawn from a prior enumeration of this basin eight years previously. In addition to providing field-level agricultural information for the Neuse basin, we will also be able to enumerate current practices in the Neuse basin and estimate nutrient losses to the watershed.
|
North Carolina |
2008
|
| I-6 Lower Creek Watershed Restoration Implementation Plan (LCWRIP)
|
Caldwell County and Burke County Soil and Water Conservation Districts are requesting $222,010 for water quality improvement projects that will implement the Lower Creek Watershed Management Plan (Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 2006) and the TMDL for turbidity in the Lower Creek Watershed. The overall goal of this project is to restore uses to at least two tributaries to Lower Creek. Lower Creek is impaired because of high turbidity levels. The following tributaries of Lower Creek including Lower Creek are 303(d) listed due to Impaired Biological Integrity: Greasy Creek, Spainhour Creek, and Zack’s Fork Creek in Caldwell County and Bristol Creek in Burke County. Erosion and sedimentation from agriculture has been identified as a potential source of pollution to Lower Creek.
The Districts would like to continue on-going efforts of working in the Lower Creek watershed to install best management practices (BMPs) according to the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service technical standards that would improve riparian zones and limit livestock access to the streams, for improved water quality. The Districts are eager to expand efforts in the Lower Creek watershed to install storm water BMPs that will decrease storm water runoff and thereby protect stream banks from erosive storms.
|
North Carolina |
2008 |
| I-7 Lower Abbotts Creek Watershed Plan
|
The Piedmont Triad Council of Governments (PTCOG) will produce a comprehensive watershed plan based on the EPA’s 9 Key Elements guidelines to identify and mitigate pollution sources in the lower Abbotts Creek watershed of Davidson County, NC. This plan will rely upon a combination of public outreach, field work, GIS analysis, and computer modeling, and is designed for project and policy implementation. A Final Report constituted of an implementation timeline, a detailed watershed assessment, and a project atlas listing the most significant restoration and mitigation sites in the area is the primary product of this project. |
North Carolina |
2008
|
| I-8 Newfound Creek Watershed Project
|
Buncombe County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) is requesting $459,201 over three years for water quality improvement projects that will implement the TMDL for fecal coliform in Newfound Creek Watershed.
The priority of the Newfound Project is to reduce fecal coliform and sediment through the installation of Best Management practices (BMP’s) recognized by state and federal agencies. The Newfound Watershed Project has been growing for 10 years; helping landowners improving water quality through continuing education and installation of BMP’s through grant funds from Buncombe SWCD. These BMP’s include stream protection projects, critical area planting, riparian buffers, septic repair projects, stream bank stabilization and access road stabilization.
These projects will all assist in reducing fecal coliform and sediment loading in Newfound Creek. Continuous water quality monitoring will show their positive impact on water quality improvements within the watershed. With a 40% match from other partnering agencies and grants of $384,659 the Buncombe SWCD will continue to promote the program and improve water quality throughout Newfound Creek. Newfound Creek Watershed is a high priority for the Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD). Newfound Creek is currently listed on the NC EPA 303 (d) list, as being severely impaired, due to non-point source pollution caused by sediment and fecal contamination .
|
North Carolina |
2008 |
| Boone Watershed Partnership - Sinking Creek Restoration |
Boone Watershed Partnership, Inc. (BWP) – will administer the project and coordinate work of cooperating organizations. BWP will develop education and outreach related to the project (i.e. signage, public meetings, and BMP tours). Additionally BWP will develop and coordinate volunteer monitoring aspects of the project. |
Tennessee
|
2008 |
| Greene County SCD - College Creek Restoration |
College Creek has been classified as a warm water stream and is placed in the eco-region of Central Appalachian Ridges and Valleys. The soil within this watershed is Highly Erodible Soil (HEL) and will require special attention to sufficient sod coverage in critical areas. |
Tennessee |
2008 |
| UT- Restoration of Riparian Zone from Livestock Grazing along the Harpeth River Watershed |
Previous demonstrations have shown that removing cattle from creek banks and planting trees will reduce the degradation of the creek bank. Allowing animals to have access to the stream only in a limited number of places reduces the time spent in the creek and thus reduces destruction of the bottom of the creek and less manure and urine deposited in the creek. In this watershed it has been documented that water quality has been reduced due to pasture grazing. It is anticipated that the cooperator will continue with the practices utilized following the demonstration. |
Tennessee
|
2008 |
| Development of an Ecological Data Analyses Tool for Nonpoint Source TMDL and Watershed -Based Management Plan Implementation Reporting |
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) has been involved for over 20 years in using fish, benthic macroinvertebrates, and algae as indicators of water resource quality for streams and rivers throughout the state. These data are essential to the assessment of impairments from nutrient enrichment and sedimentation, as well as for making aquatic life use support determinations. Data is used routinely by several programs to make informed water quality and watershed protection planning decisions. Examples of these programs include Water Quality Standards, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), and the Waterbody Assessment, 303(d) Listing, and Integrated Report. In addition, these data are needed by the ADEM Nonpoint Source Unit to monitor the success of watershed management plan implementation.
|
Alabama |
2007 |
| Implementation of Nonpoint Source Components of TMDLs and Watershed Based Management Plans
|
This project will provide Section 319 incremental grant funding to develop and implement TMDL and watershed-based management plans that incorporate Section 319 grant guideline “a-i” watershed plan elements. This project serves as a “ planning tool” for the state to efficiently and practicably allocate grant funding to address NPS water quality issues, identify and cooperate with watershed partners, target priority watersheds, and provide voluntary incentive-based management solutions to the most pressing water quality problems. Watershed plans will be developed to provide goals, objectives, and timelines for impaired waters in watersheds, to be determined. Implementation of the NPS components of TMDLs and NPS watershed plans will speed restoration of impaired waters on the Section 303(d) List. Funding from this project will be used to develop additional FY06 project workplans. As stakeholders demonstrate an interest in developing and implementing watershed management plans, Section 319 assistance may be provided through this project if the plans target specific nonpoint source TMDL pollutant sources and causes and address pollutant load reductions needed to achieve state water quality standards.
|
Alabama |
2007
|
| NPS Management Program Flexibility for Emerging Issues
|
This project will provide a source of “immediate needs” funding to encourage stakeholders to develop and implement their own local management tools and techniques to protect water quality and natural resources. In addition, project funds may be used to:
a) Address specific NPS pollutant load reductions
b) Prevent new impairments and protect threatened or unimpaired waters from future impairments
c) Implement best management practices to address NPS pollutant runoff
d) Provide technical and programmatic assistance
e) Fill in water quality data and information gaps needed to complete a watershed plan in a timely manner
f) Address NPS pollutants and components of a watershed management plan
g) Help in de-listing NPS impaired waterbodies from the Section 303(d) list.
h) Support Clean Water Partnerships to restore, maintain, and protect water quality
i) Provide NPS meetings and conferences to address on-going, new and emerging issues
j) Support NPS education and outreach and provide training to specific audiences
k) Provide estimates of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment load reductions based upon water quality monitoring, modeled data, literature searches, and other documentation.
l) Support river basin scope and scale and smaller watershed facilitator and coordinator activities. |
Alabama |
2007
|
| Rotational River Basin Approach: Surface Water Quality Assessment of the Black Warrior and Cahaba River Basins
|
This project is expected to provide an estimate of the status of ecological conditions throughout the Black Warrior and Cahaba (BWC) river basins and provide data to categorize selected monitoring sites in Alabama’s Integrated Assessment Report. It can support ADEM’s Ecoregional Reference Reach Program by collecting biological, chemical and habitat data at ADEM’s established Ecoregional Reference Reaches within the BWC and help in identifying and monitoring other least-impaired reaches within the river basins. By providing data useful to developing indicators and assessment criteria that link chemical, physical, and biological conditions within a wadeable stream reach to conditions throughout the stream’s watershed, this project will also support ADEM Nonpoint Source Unit efforts to: identify impaired and least disturbed nonpoint source sites, incorporate intensive monitoring in selected watersheds; and assess the effectiveness of BMP’s implemented using Section 319 grant funds.
|
Alabama |
2007 |
| Surface Water Quality Screening Assessment of Rivers, Reservoirs, and Tributary Embayments of the Black Warrior and Cahaba River Basins and Water Quality Assessment of Alabama Reservoirs for Nutrient Criteria and Total Maximum Daily Loads
|
Water quality data collected during this project will provide an estimate of the current water quality and trophic state of the rivers, reservoirs, tributary embayments, and stream tributaries of the Black Warrior River and Cahaba River Basins. Water quality assessments of these nonwadeable waterbodies will complement the assessment of wadeable streams proposed in the FY07 Base Section 319 Project 2 entitled: “Rotational River Basin Approach: Surface Water Quality Assessment of the Black Warrior and Cahaba River Basins” and allow for more definitive determinations of water quality.
|
Alabama
|
2007 |
| Wolf Creek Watershed Project |
Wolf Creek is a tributary of the Little Tallapoosa River-Wedowee Creek subwatershed (12-digit HUC 03151081004) and is part of the Coopers Rock Creek Subwatershed within the Tallapoosa River Basin. The watershed is wholly located in Randolph County, near the Morrison’s Crossroads community, approximately 9 miles NE of Wedowee. The watershed has a drainage area of 5.2 square miles. This 4-mile stream segment is impaired from the Little Tallapoosa River to its source. |
Alabama |
2007
|
| Coastal NPS Program
|
To address the impacts of nonpoint source pollution on coastal water quality, Congress enacted section 6217, "Protecting Coastal Waters," which was codified as 16 U.S.C. -1455b. This section provides that each State with an approved coastal zone management program must develop and submit to EPA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for approval a Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program. The purpose of the program "shall be to develop and implement management measures for nonpoint source pollution to restore and protect coastal waters, working in close conjunction with other State and local authorities." Georgia’s Coastal Nonpoint Source Program is under development and has existing conditions imposed by EPA and NOAA in order to achieve full approval. EPA has directed that states with conditional approval dedicate a minimum of $100,000 in 319 grant funds each year toward program development to achieve full approval. Georgia’s deadline for program submission is June 2007.
|
Georgia
|
2007 |
| Ebenezer Creek DO TMDL Implementation Project |
Ebenezer Creek is listed on the Section 305(b) list of “rivers and streams not supporting designated uses”. The criterion violated is dissolved oxygen and the designated use is fishing. This project will install agricultural BMPs on farms in the Ebenezer Creek Watershed and will help implement the Dissolved Oxygen (DO) TMDL Implementation Plan for Ebenezer Creek, which was developed using USEPA funds. |
Georgia
|
2007 |
| Implementing Agricultural Components of the Yam Grandy and Jacks Creek Watershed TMDL Implementation Plans
|
The Ohoopee River Watershed is located in the northern Coastal Plain of Georgia in the Altamaha River Basin. As identified in the 2006 305(b)/303(d) Rivers/Streams Not Fully Supporting Designated Uses, Jack’s Creek and Yam Grandy Creek are listed as “not supporting” or partially supporting their designated uses with fecal coliform as the criteria violated. This project area consists of 38,895 acres of which 65 % of livestock producers are expected to participate. This project accompanied by the USDA EQIP program funds that will include participation from a very large percentage of livestock producers and will have a significant effect on reducing the agricultural contribution to criterion violation. |
Georgia |
2007 |
| Implementing Agricultural Components of TMDL Implementation Plans in the Upper Broad River Basin
|
The TMDL Implementation Plan has identified nonpoint sources as the primary cause of excessive pollutant loading. The plan advocates the installation of BMPs to address the major pollutant categories of concern for the watershed. The Upper Broad River Watershed TMDL Implementation Project will provide opportunities for the planning and installation of BMPs that meet EPD requirements and may supply some of the data necessary for any revision of the Georgia TMDL Implementation Plan.
The Chestatee-Chattahoochee RC&D Council has an ongoing project, the North Fork Broad River 319(h) Project. This project is exclusive to the North Fork Broad River Watershed in Franklin and Stephens Counties. The focus of this project has been soil erosion BMP installation and prevention. The installation of stream revetments has been the predominant practice within the North Fork Broad River 319(h) Project with some exclusion fencing, critical area treatment and stream crossings also being installed. In addition, this project also targets a limited number of unpaved (dirt) roads to reduce soil erosion and sediment transport. The North Fork Broad River 319(h) Project does not address animal waste issues, and the total number of participants has been somewhat limited by the substantial cost of stream revetments. The proposed Upper Broad River Watershed Project will compliment this and other existing programs by continuing to offer cost share funding for soil erosion BMP installation and by offering additional funding for the implementation of BMPs that address animal waste issues within a larger portion of the Broad River Watershed.
|
Georgia |
2007 |
| Implementing Agricultural Components of TMDL Implementation Plans in the Upper Ochlockonee River Basin
|
The GAEPD is proposing Best Management Practice (BMP) projects to address the major pollutant categories of concern for the River Basin. The Upper Ochlockonee River Basin TMDL Implementation Project will provide opportunities for the planning and installation of BMPs that will meet the EPD requirements for such practices and may supply some of the data necessary for any revisions to the Georgia TMDL Implementation Plan.
Upper Ochlockonee TMDL Implementation Project will provide additional funding to accelerate the installation of those BMPs that can best address animal waste, nutrients and soil erosion in the contributing drainage areas above those stream segments showing significant water quality impairment. It is estimated approximately 74% of producer applications with proposed practices that would have significant potential to improve runoff to these impaired streams were not approved because of inadequate funding. They were approximately $3.5 million dollars in cost share requests in the Middle South Georgia Soil and Water Conservation District, (Colquitt, Thomas and Worth Counties), while funding was approved for only $1.2 million dollars.
This project is part of a continuing and multi-phased effort attempting to respond to watershed TMDLs by implementing agricultural BMPs to restore, abate, and improve water quality in watershed streams used for aquatic habitat and contact recreation.
|
Georgia |
2007
|
| Potato Creek BMP Implmentation
|
The lower portion of Potato Creek was placed on the 1998 303(d) list as impaired due to fecal coliform. In 2002, this reach was removed from the list and replaced by the middle portion of Potato Creek, again as impaired due to fecal coliform. The EPA established a TMDL for fecal coliform in Potato Creek in 1998. A TMDL Implementation Plan was formulated by the McIntosh Trail Regional Development Center, (RDC) in 2001 as part of the state-wide effort by the RDCs to produce implementation plans for all TMDLs. In an effort to development a more cost-effective field application of tracking fecal coliform sources, the RDC applied for a 319 grant in 2003. A partnership with the University of Georgia, (UGA) was developed in this project with UGA providing research quality investigation into the sources of fecal coliform in the Potato Creek Watershed. One result of the previous 319 Grant has been to develop the cost-effective field application using a combination of targeted water quality sampling and fluorometry.
|
Georgia
|
2007 |
| Spring Creek Watershed Partnership
|
To future help improve the water quality in Spring Creek, the Golden Triangle RC&D Council with the assistance from the SCWP is using FY01 Section 319(h) Grant funds to develop a comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (WMP), work with landowners to implement BMPs, and conduct public education and outreach.
The SCWP is now focused on implementing the WMP and will use in part FY07 Section 319(h) Grant funds to carryout this project, “Implementation of the Spring Creek Management Plan Project Phase II”. In this project, the WMP will be implemented and updated, additional landowners will be approved for BMPs, and outreach and public education activities will be continued.
|
Georgia |
2007 |
| Water Quality Improvement Projects for the Corbin City Reservoir Watershed
|
|
Kentucky |
2007 |
| Bear/Yellow Creek (MSWCC)
|
The purpose of this MOA is to reduce non-point source (NPS) pollution within the Bear Creek Sub-Watershed (USGS HUC-06030006) and Yellow Creek Sub-Watershed (USGS HUC-06030005). Because of NPS pollution from sediment, primarily as a result of poor agricultural and silvicultural practices, various BMPs and other activities, i.e. public education and outreach, need to be implemented. These sub-watersheds are located in the Pickwick Reservoir Watershed, Hydrologic Unit Code 0603, in Tishomingo County in north Mississippi.
|
Mississippi |
2007 |
| Bear/Yellow Creek (TVA)
|
This project will address non-point source pollution in Yellow and Bear Creeks in northeast Mississippi. Primary emphasis will be given to reduce sediment and organic pollution. Partners will work with interested residents and property owners to increase water quality awareness and establish efforts to improve water quality in these watersheds. Emphasis will be given to projects that will help remove Caney, Little Cripple Deer and Cripple Deer Creeks and Holly Branch from the State’s 303(d) list. Since Caney Creek is a priority watershed for Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and MDEQ, and waters from this watershed could have direct impact on the Short Coleman and proposed Doskie water intakes, priority will be given to all projects in this watershed.
|
Mississippi
|
2007 |
| CZARA (Turkey Creek) |
The purpose of this project is to acquire sensitive parcels of land located within the Mississippi Coastal Zone. |
Mississippi |
2007 |
| Lake Washington |
Lake Washington and two of its unnamed tributaries have been placed on Mississippi’s 303 (d) list of impaired waterbodies as being impaired due to sediment. The Lake Washington watershed is composed of a complex series of natural levees, slack water areas and shallow depressions that parallel the meander belt of the old river channel. Lake Washington is an oxbow lake and is the largest waterbody in the watershed with 2,965 acres of open water and receives drainage from a number of ditches including several connected to Lake Britton, Lake Bryant and Lake Jackson. Lake Washington is drained by Washington Bayou, which is a tributary of Steele Bayou. |
Mississippi |
2007 |
| Wolf/Broad Lake Project
|
In cooperation with the Wolf Lake Watershed Implementation Team, Delta F.A.R.M. proposes to develop and implement a Comprehensive Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Wolf Lake Watershed (HUC: 08030206 & 303(d) List Segment ID: MS363WLM, MS363E) in order to improve water quality in Wolf and Broad Lakes. As identified as a priority watershed by the Yazoo River Basin Team, this project will attempt to implement solutions in the Wolf Lake Watershed that address all concerns that have been identified by the Watershed Implementation Team (WIT). The primary objective of this project will be to implement solutions that will use established Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) as a target to help achieve Wolf and Broad Lake’s designated use. TMDLs on Wolf and Broad Lake include Sedimentation/Siltation, Organic Enrichment/Low DO, Nutrients, and Legacy Pesticides.
|
Mississippi |
2007 |
| B-1 Nondischarge Permitting and Enforcement
|
As the population of North Carolina grows and the waste assimilation capacity of the state's streams is diminished, nondischarge alternatives for treated wastewater disposal will become more prevalent. The nondischarge permitting program consists of all wastewater treatment, disposal, and/or collection systems that do not discharge directly to surface waters. The exception is wastewater disposal permits issued by DEH/Onsite Section for subsurface septic systems. Nondischarge systems are typically designed to treat wastes through land application techniques and therefore may contribute loadings as nonpoint sources. North Carolina regulations require that applicants for NPDES permits must first consider nondischarge alternatives. The state has over 1339 existing treatment and disposal nondischarge permits for activities including groundwater remediation, residuals disposal and reuse, spray irrigation, evaporation, infiltration and recycling. These complex systems often require intensive evaluation and site work and their numbers are expected to continue to increase. In addition, the state realized an increase in the number and size of animal feeding operations in the 1990’s. The state has approximately 2,400 permitted animal operations and the greatest number of large animal operations (i.e. concentrated animal feeding operations as defined in 40 CFR Part 122.21) in Region 4. More information on each program area is provided below.
|
North Carolina
|
2007 |
| B-3 Basinwide Management
|
A basinwide plan is prepared for each river basin in order to communicate to policy makers, the regulated community, and the general public the state's rationale, approaches, and long-term strategies for each basin. The plans are circulated for public review and comment. To the best of DWQ’s abilities, based on available resources and staff, implementation of the plan is coordinated with local entities. Nonpoint source pollution reduction recommendations are presented in each plan to aid local and state groups in the development of site-specific restoration strategies. The plans are used as watershed restoration plans for many Section 319 restoration (incremental) proposals, as well as for proposals to the North Carolina Clean Water Management Trust Fund and for Ag Cost-Share Funds.
A portion of the funding under this activity will be used to support a basinwide planning position. The basinwide planner has responsibility for developing use support ratings, directing the planning, preparation, and finalization of basinwide water quality plans for selected river basins in the state. This responsibility includes public outreach and nonpoint education activities such as participating in public workshops and meetings, speaking to various interest groups, and coordinating with state and federal agency personnel and local watershed groups on plan development and implementation. The planner provides input into activities of local watershed groups and natural resource agencies, the NPS Team process, as well as point source discharger organizations similar to the Tar-Pamlico Association.
|
North Carolina
|
2007 |
| B-7 Groundwater Program |
The major nonpoint source goals of the State aquifer protection program are to protect surface water from contaminants by preventing runoff of wastes to surface water, and controlling the movement of polluted shallow groundwater into surface water.
Groundwater is a major contributor to the baseflow of streams. Prevention of contamination of shallow aquifers from a wide variety of waste disposal practices and chemicals from various land uses is necessary to protect water quality from many nonpoint sources. Uncontaminated groundwater baseflow in streams supports healthy assemblages of aquatic organisms and prevents eutrophication of receiving streams, estuaries, and watersheds. Knowledge of the chemical quality and hydrologic properties of shallow groundwater under a variety of land uses is necessary for establishing appropriate water pollution prevention policies. |
North Carolina |
2007 |
| B-8 Erosion and Sedimentation Control
|
The Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section and the Sedimentation Control Commission have set funds for educational materials aside. However, these funds cannot be used for staff positions. Therefore, Section 319(h) funding is needed to support the Sediment Education Specialist to administer the education program. This position is located in the Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section.
The primary function of this position is education and outreach. Measurable results include the number of people (contractors and the public) reached through workshops, conferences, and newsletters, as well as the number of information requests filled. The Sedimentation Education Specialist is also responsible for the revisions of the NC Erosion & Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, which give guidelines on the best measures and design practices for erosion and sediment control. Sediment is the largest water pollutant, by volume, in the state of NC. Through education and training, this position aids in the control of erosion and sedimentation, thus positively impacting water quality throughout the state.
|
North Carolina
|
2007 |
| C-3 Demonstration and Evaluation of Rainwater Harvesting/Cistern Technology |
The goal of this project is to highlight across North Carolina (coastal plain, sandhills, piedmont, and mountains) the many applications of water harvesting technology. Several uses for cisterns will be examined: washing emergency vehicles, washing agricultural equipment, irrigating a landscape, irrigating gardens, and toilet flushing. The “efficiency” of each use will be compared and data will be collected to help the State of North Carolina determine the amount of runoff reduction and nutrient removal credit that should be awarded the use of cisterns. An existing model will be further tested and refined based upon the data collected from several of the sites. A water harvesting website will be revised as well. A water harvesting fact sheet will be written and distributed via the website and at a series of 4 water harvesting workshops conducted across North Carolina. Through this demonstration and evaluation of water harvesting systems, the use of these innovative water management devices is expected to grow. |
North Carolina |
2007 |
| C-6 Certified Nutrient Management Training and Tool Support |
Certified nutrient management plans are critical to agriculture in North Carolina. This project would enable certified nutrient management planners to be trained, continue to update necessary nutrient management tools, such as the Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) and the Nitrogen Loss Estimation Worksheet (NLEW), and provide outreach to producers on current nutrient management issues. Having certified planners and nutrient management tools are essential to the functions of both state and federal agencies: NCDENR- Division of Water Quality and Soil and Water and USDA-NRCS. In addition, this project would also provide necessary work on two issues that affect the build-up of phosphorus in soils: the need for starter phosphorus on soils testing very high in phosphorus and sludge application from lagoons. Recent results suggest, but do not clearly indicate, that starter phosphorus is not needed for corn and cotton on soils testing above 100 phosphorus index. If this suggestion is confirmed, we can dramatically reduce the amount of P applied in agricultural watersheds. In addition, some evidence suggests that sludge applied on a nitrogen basis will dramatically accelerate phosphorus, heavy metals (Cu and Zn) and even pH in soils. We need to be able to predict increases in phosphorus, heavy metals and pH based on soil type, current soil test levels, and content of these elements in sludge. This project will allow us to develop the necessary algorithms. |
North Carolina
|
2007
|
| I-1 Community Conservation Assistance Program in Targeted TMDL Watersheds |
This grant application will help implement the Community Conservation Assistance Program (CCAP) in four selected watersheds with completed TMDLs in the Cape Fear, Catawba and Neuse River Basins. All requested funds will be used to install approved CCAP BMPs in the Lower Creek, Neuse River Estuary, Little Troublesome Creek and Muddy Creek TMDL watersheds. CCAP BMPs include rain gardens, critical area plantings, tree and shrub establishment, retention pond restoration, impervious surface removal, permeable pavement, grass swales, stream restoration, streambank stabilization, cisterns, pet waste receptacles and septic system repairs. |
North Carolina
|
2007
|
| I-2 Robeson Creek Watershed Restoration Project |
The Robeson Creek Watershed is impaired for Total Phosphorus, Habitat Degradation, and Aquatic Weeds. Through this project, multiple BMPs are proposed for implementation throughout the watershed at targeted locations to address these impairments. Both urban and agricultural BMPs will be implemented throughout the watershed in critical areas determined by the TMDL Implementation Plan. Because this is a rapidly developing watershed, low impact development and stormwater ordinance education of local government and builders as well as an LID demonstration site is proposed to help stakeholders understand and prevent further degradation and actually work to improve stream health. Using the existing TMDL Implementation Plan, a watershed plan for Robeson Creek will be developed to assist stakeholders in making decisions about water quality measures. This study is currently underway and will define options for restoring the lake’s water quality and habitat. The Haw River Assembly (HRA) has been granted Section 319 funding for its Stream Steward Campaign in this watershed. HRA developed a stream stewardship guidebook for landowners, performed stream assessments within the watershed, surveyed local business and gave awards for good stream stewardship, and have hosted several workshops for landowner education regarding water quality. |
North Carolina
|
2007
|
| I-4 Lockwood Folly Water Quality Restoration TMDL Development Project |
The entire Lockwood Folly River is listed as impaired waters by the NC Division of Water Quality.
This 319 project builds upon work currently underway, and allows for refinement of these preliminary strategies to help assure that management actions will be effective and have the capacity to achieve compliance with federal Clean Water Act TMDL requirements for impaired water bodies. The TMDL-based management strategy that results from this project is likely to serve as a model approach for addressing impairment in other shellfish waters, and should provide valuable science-based guidance on how to address these widespread impairments without spending extremely limited time and financial resources developing detailed receiving water quality models for every water body. Specifically, this project aims at: (1) documenting sources and pathways that are currently delivering fecal coliform to impaired waters; (2) developing a workable TMDL for the river that supports and helps calibrate watershed management actions; (3) enabling watershed management strategy to cost-effectively target known and potential pollution sources and pathways; (4) engaging local decision makers and the public as partners in carrying out management actions by keeping them informed through on-going progress reports and press releases on project findings; (5) providing necessary data to help quantify how much emphasis must be placed on various elements of management strategies such as public education, stormwater discharge retrofits, post-development guidelines, land acquisition for preservation and restoration projects; and financial incentives for improved land use practices; and (6) promoting partnerships for implementing various elements of the watershed management strategy both through the direct participation of project partners as well as new partners such as the Clean Water Management Trust Fund. |
North Carolina
|
2007
|
| I-6 Data Collection in Support of Upper Yadkin River Watershed-High Rock Lake Chlorophyll-a & Turbidity TMDL Modeling |
High Rock Lake is an impoundment of the Yadkin River and was constructed in 1929 to provide hydroelectric power. It is owned and operated by the Yadkin Division of Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. (APGI). The lake has been monitored since the early 1970s, and has consistently shown a high level of eutrophication, with elevated chlorophyll a, nutrient concentrations, and dissolved gas levels. The lake also receives large inputs of sediment, which have reduced depth noticeably in some portions of the lake. The sediment load, combined with algal production and hydropower operation, result in turbidity problems throughout the lake. High Rock Lake has been placed on the 2004 North Carolina list of impaired waters for exceedances of the chlorophyll a and turbidity standards in the lake, and requires development of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). The specific impairments are shown in Table 3. The objective of the proposed project is to collect the data necessary to develop, calibrate, confirm and apply a linked watershed-lake model required for development of the TMDL. |
North Carolina
|
2007
|
| I-7 GIS Land Cover for the High Rock Lake Watershed, High Rock Lake TMDL |
High Rock Lake is located in Rowan and Davidson Counties in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin, North Carolina and has been placed on the draft 2004 North Carolina list of impaired waters (303(d) list). Completion of the TMDLs for High Rock Lake will require the development of water quality models for nutrient response and watershed loading. The objective of this project is to develop the land cover for the High Rock Lake watershed. The land cover will be developed in a GIS format compatible with ArcView 3.X and ArcGIS. A 30 m grid cell will be utilized, similar to the 1992/93 land cover that DWQ currently utilizes. Additionally, this project will develop interfaces for water quality modeling purposes. The development of reasonable estimates of loading, and the sources of that loading, will be critical to the development of a nutrient management strategy. |
North Carolina
|
2007
|
| I-8 Lake Jordan Paired Watershed Study |
Agriculture is an important land use in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin. This project, using a paired watershed design, will track 4 watersheds (2 pairs) for nutrients and sediments before- and after-rule implementation. Two of the watersheds will be located in the Cape Fear (one primarily pasture and the other primarily row crop). Two matched watersheds will be located in the Cape Fear and Yadkin Basins in the same major soil group. Monitoring will occur for total phosphorus, orthophosphate, total kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, total suspended solids and fecal coliform. Both stormwater sampling using automated samplers, as well as monthly grab sampling will occur. The data will be paired for land use and an analysis done to determine 1) if land use affects nutrient or sediment loading rate, and 2) if rule implementation changes water quality data. To conduct this type of work, at least two years of pre-implementation data is required and 3 years of post-implementation. Due to the Department’s 3-year limitation on grants, we will conduct pre-implementation monitoring and only begin to obtain data on the post-rule implementation phase under this grant. |
North Carolina |
2007 |
| R-1 Town Lake Weed Control for Wetland Restoration |
This EPA Section 319 proposal aims to address the management program for the aquatic, semi-aquatic and terrestrial weeds that plague the project site. Over three years, an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan will be implemented to control the aquatic, semi-aquatic and terrestrial weeds. The IPM will employ appropriate herbicides in the upper lake to control weed growth without adversely impacting aquatic life as well as control semi-aquatic and terrestrial weeds in and around the restoration project. Because of the invasiveness and dominance of the exotic weeds, implementing the IPM to reduce and control weed infestations is necessary to allow native plants to establish in the emergent wetland and the surrounding riparian areas. Initial control and subsequent treatments will allow native vegetation to firmly establish and effectively out-compete residual invasive exotic vegetation at the site. Educational workshops, tours, and interpretive sign installation around the lake will contribute to citizen knowledge and support of this project. |
North Carolina
|
2007 |
| Hills Creek WS WQ Improvement Project |
The Hills Creek watershed above its confluence with the Conway Branch and Lynches River has been targeted for fecal coliform bacteria reduction by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC). Recreational and Aquatic Life Uses are not supported or only partially supported in portions of the watershed due to fecal coliform bacteria excursions. Increasing turbidity, pH fluctuations, and increasing fecal coliform bacteria trends are also seen in areas of the watershed. The presence of fecal coliform bacteria in aquatic environments indicates that water has been contaminated with fecal material of man or other warm-blooded animals. It is assumed that water bodies possessing high concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria may also be contaminated by pathogens, or disease producing bacteria or viruses, which can also exist in fecal materials. Some waterborne diseases associated with fecal material include typhoid fever, viral and bacterial gastroenteritis, and hepatitis A. Fecal contamination is frequently used as an indicator of potential health risks for individuals exposed to this water. Fecal coliform bacteria may occur in ambient water as a result of the overflow of domestic sewage or NPS of human and animal waste. |
South Carolina
|
2007 |
| Nonpoint Source Compliance Inspections |
The Nonpoint Source Management Program identifies animal waste as a sig nificant nonpoint source threat to state surface and ground waters. In South Carolina, the majority of these wastes are manure from dairy, beef, poultry, and swine operations. |
South Carolina |
2007 |
| TMDL Development and Implementation |
SCDHEC uses a geographically based watershed approach for water quality management activities, known as the Watershed Water Quality Management Program (WWQMP). This program addresses point and nonpoint source pollution and allows water quality to be examined in a holistic manner. This project continues this program by providing staff support to identify NPS pollution problems, develop TMDLs, and develop GIS applications. |
South Carolina |
2007 |
| TMDL Implementation for FC Bacteria in Turkey Creek an Bullock Creek Watersheds |
The targeted areas in Turkey Creek (waters above sampling stations B-136, B-086, and RS-05562) and Bullock Creek (waters above sampling stations B-159, B-325, RS-05394) Watersheds have been documented by South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) as violating the water quality standard for fecal coliform bacteria and were placed on the 303(d) list for impaired water systems. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) have since been developed for these areas. |
South Carolina |
2007 |
| Beaver Creek Restoration Initiative - University of TN |
Since its formation in 1998, the BEAVER CREEK TASK FORCE (BCTF) has been a collaborative effort to restore Beaver Creek and its tributaries to fully supporting their designated uses by implementing restoration practices and promoting sound economic development. |
Tennnessee |
2007 |
| Greene Co SCD - Holley & Richland Creeks Watershed Plan |
The Greene County Soil Conservation District is please to submit this proposal for grant funds to support the generation of Watershed Plans for Holley and Richland Creeks in the town of Greeneville and Greene County. The amount of this request is $20,000 to be used to contract with an independent contractor, for the generation of the Watershed Plan. Forty percent matching funds will be provided as in kind labor by the Soil Conservation District employees and the Middle Nolichuckey Watershed Alliance. |
Tennnessee |
2007 |
| Morgan County SCD - Crooked Fork Restoration Project |
The Crooked Fork Restoration Project has focused on assessment, education, partnership development and planning over the last 4 years. These efforts have built a strong foundation and adequate momentum to develop and implement a Watershed Restoration Plan. The watershed was targeted as a priority within the Emory River Watershed due to its status on the 303(d) list, strength of partnerships, local citizens interest and the belief that we can be successful.
The TMDL includes an implementation plan to address nonpoint sources that recommends the following steps:
1. conduct a detailed survey of impaired subwatersheds to identify additional sources of sediment loading.
2. advocacy of local area ordinances and zoning that will minimize sediment loading to waterbodies, including establishment of buffer strips along streambanks, reduction of activities in riparians areas and minimization of road and bridge construction impacts.
3. educate the public as to the detrimental effects of sediment loading to waterbodies and measures to minimize this loading.
4. advocacy of agricultural BMPs (e.g. riparian buffer, animal waste management systems, waste utilization, stream stabilization, fencing, heavy use area treatment protection, livestock exclusion, etc) and practices to minimize erosion and sediment transport to streams.
Partners and local volunteers have completed the first step of the TMDL implementation plan. In addition, a model has been developed to predict post-restoration sediment load reductions based on iterative interactions with the model. This project will implement steps 2, 3 and 4 of the TMDL implementation plan, address additional mine and barren land sediment sources and monitor for project effectiveness. |
Tennnessee |
2007 |
| Pond Creek Protection and Water Quality Improvement Project |
The University of Tennessee Extension, in collaboration with other agencies in Tennessee, is proposing to expand a water quality improvement project in the Pond Creek watershed (TN06010202013) in the Upper Tennessee Basin of Eastern Tennessee. Agriculture in the Pond Creek watershed is typical of beef cow-calf and dairy systems in the Southeastern United States. Pond Creek is listed on the 303(d) list as an impaired stream in Tennessee for pathogens and nutrients. Dairy and beef cattle operations are the main agricultural activities in the watershed and are suspected to be responsible for much of the pollution. The project is seeking to address non-point source impairments in the Pond Creek Watershed and install best management practices (BMPs) and restore it to the condition of fully supporting its designated uses. |
Tennnessee |
2007 |
| TDEC/WPC Watershed Assessment Support - Monitoring |
This project will monitor watersheds located throughout the state.
The timely funding of the proposed projects will have several expected benefits that will immediately be realized: 1. General qualitative assessment at the watershed level (BioRecon) will identify areas for further attention. 2. Specific monitoring [single habitat approach (RBP3) and chemical analyses] at sites identified in BioRecon will provide more detailed information about the causes of nps impacts and 3. Fluvial geomorphology techniques will provide information about erosion and sediment of reference and impacted streams.
All selected sites will be mapped on GIS. Data, strategies, and watershed plans will be shared with cooperating organizations. |
Tennnessee |
2007 |
| Identification of Benthic Macroinvertebrates to Assess Nonpoint Source TMDL and Watershed-Based Management Plan Implementation Success |
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) has been involved for over 20 years in using fish, benthic macroinvertebrates, and algae as indicators of water resource quality for streams and rivers throughout the state. These data are essential to the assessment of impairments from nutrient enrichment and sedimentation, as well as for making aquatic life use support determinations. Data is used routinely by several programs to make informed water quality and watershed protection planning decisions. Examples of these programs include Water Quality Standards, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), and the Waterbody Assessment, 303(d) Listing, and Integrated Report. In addition, these data are needed by the ADEM Nonpoint Source Unit to monitor the success of watershed management plan implementation. As reliance on biological data for NPS assessments has increased in recent years, the pressure for timely ecological reports and the use of robust indicators has increased. Primary among multiple quality characteristics of ecological data are those related to taxonomic identifications of organisms contained within samples and the development of appropriate environmental indicators. |
Alabama |
2006 |
| Implementation of Nonpoint Source Components of TMDLs and Watershed Based Management Plans |
This project will provide Section 319 incremental grant funding to develop and implement TMDL and watershed-based management plans that incorporate Section 319 grant guideline “a-i” watershed plan elements. This project serves as a “ planning tool” for the state to efficiently and practicably allocate grant funding to address NPS water quality issues, identify and cooperate with watershed partners, target priority watersheds, and provide voluntary incentive-based management solutions to the most pressing water quality problems. Watershed plans will be developed to provide goals, objectives, and timelines for impaired waters in watersheds, to be determined. Implementation of the NPS components of TMDLs and NPS watershed plans will speed restoration of impaired waters on the Section 303(d) List. Funding from this project will be used to develop additional FY06 project workplans. As stakeholders demonstrate an interest in developing and implementing watershed management plans, Section 319 assistance may be provided through this project if the plans target specific nonpoint source TMDL pollutant sources and causes and address pollutant load reductions needed to achieve state water quality standards. |
Alabama
|
2006
|
| Lower Flint Creek Watershed Restoration Project
|
Lower Flint Creek (included in Flint Creek) is identified on the 1996, 1998, and 2000 CWA Section 303 (d) list of impaired waterbodies as not supporting its water use classification of Fish and Wildlife. A Draft TMDL for Organic Enrichment/Dissolved Oxygen, Nutrients, and Pathogens was developed August 2003 and a Final TMDL approved on September 2003. A Draft TMDL for siltation was developed February 2002 and a Final TMDL approved in October 2003. The water use classification is Fish and Wildlife. There are no contributing TMDL point sources in the watershed. Identification and quantification of specific sources of nonpoint source pollutants presents a challenge. However, pathogens from failing septage treatment systems, leaking and overflowing sewage lines, and agricultural practices (livestock operations, pasture and hayland runoff) and naturally occurring sources (domestic pets and wildlife) and sedimentation from streambank, cropland, and urban construction erosion transporting sediment and nutrients are impairing the Lower Flint Watershed. Organic Enrichment and Dissolved Oxygen impairments are driven by low stream flows and high temperatures occurring during the critical, dry summer months of June – October. |
Alabama |
2006 |
| Rotational River Basin Approach |
This project will estimate the status of ecological conditions throughout the Escatawpa, Mobile Bay Area, Upper Tombigbee, and Lower Tombigbee River basins (EMT). It will also provide the data necessary to categorize waters in Alabama’s Integrated Assessment Report, as well as to develop nutrient criteria, biological condition gradients, and assessment criteria. This will be accomplished by monitoring watersheds (monitoring units) in proportion to an environmental index or Human Disturbance Gradient (HDG). ADEM delineated monitoring units (MUs) based on 12-digit HUCs to more closely link assessment results to watershed conditions. Monitoring watersheds in proportion to an HDG has been recently proposed as a method to limit error or bias associated with targeted sampling. It has also been recommended by the EPA to develop Tiered Aquatic Life Uses, to correlate suspected stressors to known levels of impairment, and to consequently improve the overall assessment of water quality within a basin group. The project will also include sampling all of ADEM’s established Ecoregional Reference Reaches within the EMT basin group, thereby incorporating the biological and chemical sampling of reference reaches conducted during past Basin Assessment Projects. Additionally, sampling MUs with relatively low and high potentials for impairment provides a method to identify least- and most-impaired sites in support of ADEM’s Ecoregional Reference Reach and Section 303(d) Monitoring Programs. Core indicators and sampling frequency were selected to meet data requirements as outlined in Alabama’s draft 2005 Listing and Assessment Methodology. Additionally, this sampling strategy will provide data to develop indicators and assessment criteria that link chemical, physical, and biological conditions within a wadeable stream reach to conditions throughout the stream’s watershed. |
Alabama |
2006 |
| Surface Water Quality Screening Assessment of Rivers |
Water quality data collected through this project will provide an estimate of the current water quality and trophic state of the rivers, reservoirs, tributary embayments, and stream tributaries of the Coosa River, Tallapoosa River, and Alabama River Basins. Water quality assessments of these nonwadeable waterbodies will serve as a complement to the assessment of wadeable streams in the project Surface Water Quality Assessment of the Tombigbee, Mobile, and Escatawpa River Basins and will allow for more definitive determinations of water quality |
Alabama |
2006 |
| Implementing Septic System BMPs to Reduce FC in the Conasauga River Watershed |
Several stream segments in the Conasauga River watershed are listed (not supporting designated uses) due to fecal coliform bacteria. The 2001 TMDL Implementation Plan for the watershed identified septic systems as a souce of fecal contamination in Holly Creek (Murray County), Coahulla Creek (Whitfield County), and in the lower reaches of the Conasauga River below GA Route 286 (both counties). The 2003 TMDL indicated fecal coliform load reductions of 65%, 89% and 74% are needed in these respective reaches. |
Georgia |
2006 |
| Implementing the WRAS for the Willacoochee River Watershed
|
In 2005, the Seven Rivers Resource Conservation & Development (RC&D) Council and its project partners, completed the 319(h) funded Alapaha – Willacoochee River Watershed Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS). While it was known that agriculture and silviculture (the largest land uses in the watershed) are the primary sources of non-point source pollution, the WRAS also identified others such as urban runoff and industrial waste. The WRAS also catalogued locations within the watershed with poor ecological conditions including elevated levels of nitrate-nitrite, ortho-phosphorus, and was designed to provide the framework for implementation of programs to abate non-point source pollution as well as landowner education about these issues.
Through this project, the Seven Rivers Resource Conservation & Development (RC&D) Council will implement best management practices (BMPs) in identified poor water quality areas of the watershed, as called for in the WRAS. In addition to installing BMPs, the project’s primary goals include working directly with landowners to increase understanding of the sources of non-point source pollution as well as the need and ways to protect and improve water quality. Citizen involvement was a key element in the development of the WRAS and will be critical to attaining stakeholder involvement and consequently achieving water quality improvements. |
Georgia |
2006 |
| Implementing TMDLs for FC and DO in the Lower Ogeechee |
This project implements the Agricultural components of the Initial TMDL Implementation Plans for both DO and FC in Cedar Creek and DO in Bull Creek. The Executive Summary of the TMDL Evaluation for Fecal Coliform summarizes its Initial TMDL Implementation Plan as follows: “Management practices that may be used to help reduce fecal coliform source loads include… Adoption of NRCS Conservation Practices and Application of Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to reduce nonpoint sources. The amount of fecal coliform delivered to a stream is difficult to determine. However, by requiring and monitoring the implementation of these management practices, their effects will improve stream water quality, and represent a beneficial measure of TMDL implementation.” The Executive Summary for the Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Implementation Plan includes similar language. |
Georgia |
2006 |
| Initiative for Watershed Excellence - Phase 2 |
In order to maximize the results of this demonstration project, an initial scoping process will be used to identify the specific technical, legal and organizational needs of Upper Altamaha stakeholders and then prioritize those needs. The scoping will consist of surveying stakeholder groups, including local governments, land trusts, advocacy organizations and federal, state, and regional resource agencies, and reviewing materials such as TMDLS, river basin management plans and other studies. A team consisting of faculty and staff from our consortium of universities and colleges, representatives from GAEPD, USEPA, the Georgia Department of Community Affairs, the Soil and Water Conservation Commission and possibly other resource agencies will review the surveys and determine the particular services and products the Initiative for Watershed Excellence should provide to most significantly increase the effectiveness of the stakeholder groups. Determining factors will include immediacy of results, impact in number of stream miles affected, and replicability in other parts of the watershed.
Continual project evaluation is important to the Initiative to assure that it provides maximum water quality benefits. Early in the grant period, the Initiative will research existing performance measures used by watershed groups and environmental professionals, and develop a protocol for evaluating the effectiveness of its efforts. These performance measures will include reductions in pollution loadings, number of measures implemented in impaired/threatened watersheds, participation rates in education programs, nonpoint source activities, and public awareness and education efforts. It will apply this protocol every six months and make changes to the project when and where needed to increase effectiveness. The Initiative will collect data to demonstrate success in achieving expected results, and will report its findings to GAEPD, USEPA and Upper Altamaha stakeholders each year and at the end of the project. The overall goals of the Initiative are to (continued from years 1 and 2):
1. Provide hands-on, practical products and services to promote the growth of, and increase the capacity of, local stakeholder associations committed to improving or maintaining the natural and economic resources of their watersheds.
2. Help communities identify watershed-based problems, and develop and implement locally sustainable solutions. · Focus efforts on the restoration of TMDL listed streams and particularly those listed for biota, habitat and sediment (see attached list). 3. Provide outstanding customer service and be seen as a central watershed resource for watershed planning and management assistance.
4. Draw upon expertise of faculty as well as graduate and undergraduate students of its member colleges and universities, building the capacity of these academic institutions to teach environmental management to traditional and non-traditional students. |
Georgia
|
2006
|
| Poultry Waste Management TMDL Implementation and Demonstration |
Piedmont MLRA (Major Land Resource Area) of northwest Georgia. The poultry industry continues to grow within this watershed, adding increased challenges to producers as they manage their litter and bird mortality to protect water quality. Current and past EQIP funding has not met the needs for implementing water quality practices within the watershed. Additionally, current funds under an existing 319 project have been successful in its purpose to work alongside EQIP funds to install best management practices for poultry farms. |
Georgia |
2006 |
| TMDL Plan Implementation for the Etowah River Watershed |
The Upper Etowah River Alliance, under the direction of Limestone Valley RC&D, and utilizing 319h funds, has spent the past five years working with local stakeholders in the upper section of the Etowah Basin. To date, the Alliance's work has focused on the installation of BMPs designed to mitigate the effects of NPS pollution. Efforts have also included education and outreach activities such as brochure development, workshops, presentations, and the creation of website. Additionally, the Alliance's Adopt A Stream program has been instrumental in adding three creeks to the Georgia list of impaired streams. |
Georgia |
2006 |
| WMP Development and Implementation for Mud and Little Mud Creeks (Fecal coliform) |
Water quality data collected at strategic points in the project watershed area indicate fecal coliform bacteria concentrations are exceeding the state standard, and as a consequence, Mud and Little Mud Creek are not supporting their designated uses. The State of Georgia has, therefore, placed both Mud Creek (13-mile stream length) and Little Mud Creek (11-mile stream length) from their headwater areas to their confluence on the Section 303(d) list of impaired waters. In the state’s Draft 2006 305(b)/303(d) list Biota was added an impairment to Mud Creek. Though not an official impairment, sediment loading will also be an aspect of this comprehensive watershed management plan. |
Georgia |
2006 |
| Cane Run and Royal Spring Watershed Based Plan |
The primary goals of the Cane Run and Royal Spring Watershed Based Plan Project (Phase I) are to develop a watershed based plan, develop pathogen and nutrient TMDL reports (including associated TMDL loadings, reductions, and associated implementation plans), and begin implementing the Plan to reduce, remediate, and prevent the effects of nonpoint source pollution in the watershed to meet or exceed state water quality standards. The watershed based plan will be developed and revised as the project evolves and new information is gained. The developed TMDL reports will identify watershed management needs and support future or ongoing management activities. The TMDL portion of the project will utilize historic monitoring data and/or future data to be collected by the Kentucky Division of Water. As the TMDL studies are completed, they will be incorporated in the Watershed Based Plan |
Kentucky |
2006 |
| Agricultural Assistance Program |
This implementation assistance plan is the product of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality and the Mississippi Soil and Water Conservation Commission. The purpose of this task is to provide assistance to conservation districts in the implementation of educational, restoration, and demonstration projects that will improve water quality through the reduction of NPS pollution from agricultural sources by promoting the use of best management practices. The MOU provides for an annual amount of $200,000 in 319 grant funds to be provided to the MSWCC in order that they may conduct activities such as: district assistance, conservation carnivals, surface mine permit reviews and reclamation assistance, agricultural BMP implementation, and educational assistance. |
Mississippi |
2006 |
| Brown's Creek Project |
This project will implement selected Best management Practices (BMPs) on targeted areas in the Browns Creek watershed that will result in reduced pollutant loadings from agricultural nonpoint sources. The main water quality problem to be addressed by this project is sediment. Erosion is occurring from cropland in the project area at the rate of 12 tons per acre per year and from pasture land at the rate of 7 tons per acre per year. Sediment contained in runoff is entering Big Brown Creek and Little Brown Creek along with their tributaries causing degradation of the resource base. In addition, nutrients and pesticides contained in runoff from agricultural sources, attached to sediment are posing an increasing water quality problem due to runoff from agricultural sources. |
Mississippi |
2006 |
| Dead Tiger/Orphan Creek Project |
This project will implement selected Best Management Practices (BMPs) on targeted areas in the Dead Tiger/Orphan Creek sub-watershed that will result in reduced pollutant loadings from agricultural nonpoint sources. The main water quality problem to be addressed by this project is sediment. Erosion is occurring from pasture land at the rate of 3 to 5 tons per acre per year. There is no cropland located in the watershed. Sediment contained in runoff is entering Dead Tiger and Orphan Creeks along with their tributaries causing degradation of the resource base. In addition, nutrients and pesticides contained in runoff from agricultural sources, attached to sediment are posing an increasing water quality problem due to runoff from agricultural sources. |
Mississippi |
2006 |
| Fourteen Mile/Baker Creek Project |
This project will implement selected Best management Practices (BMPs) on targeted areas in the Fourteen Mile/Bakers Creek watershed that will result in reduced pollutant loadings from agricultural nonpoint sources. The main water quality problems to be addressed by this project are sediment, pesticides and nutrients from agricultural nonpoint sources. Of primary concern is sediment from agricultural lands in the watershed. Erosion is occurring from cropland in the project area at the rate of 12 tons per acre per year and from pasture land at the rate of 5 tons per acre per year. Sediment contained in runoff is entering Fourteen Mile Creek and Bakers Creek along with their tributaries causing degradation of the resource base. In addition, nutrients and pesticides contained in runoff from agricultural sources, attached to sediment are posing an increasing water quality problem due to runoff from agricultural sources. |
Mississippi |
2006 |
| Twenty Mile/Donovan Creek Project |
This project will implement selected Best Management Practices (BMPs) on targeted areas in the Twenty Mile/Donivan Creek watershed that will result in reduced pollutant loadings from agricultural nonpoint sources. The main water quality problem to be addressed by this project is sediment. Erosion is occurring from cropland and pastureland in the project area at the rate of 12+ tons per acre per year. Sediment contained in runoff is entering Twenty Mile and Donivan Creeks along with their tributaries causing degradation of the resource base. In addition, nutrients and pesticides contained in runoff from agricultural sources, attached to sediment are posing an increasing water quality problem due to runoff from agricultural sources. |
Mississippi |
2006 |
| B-12 Groundwater Base Program |
One of the major goals of the State groundwater protection program is to protect surface water from nonpoint source contaminants by preventing the movement of polluted shallow groundwaters into surface water. Prevention of contamination of shallow aquifers from a wide variety of waste disposal practices and chemicals from various land uses is prerequisite to sustaining healthful water quality for human consumption, and for maintaining baseflow of streams which can support healthy assemblages of aquatic organisms and prevent eutrophication of receiving streams and estuaries draining watersheds of the North Carolina Coastal Plain. Knowledge of the chemical quality of shallow groundwater under a variety of land uses in the Coastal Plain and knowledge of the environmental and hydrologic properties of the shallow aquifer in different hydrogeologic settings of the Coastal Plain is necessary for establishing appropriate regulations and guidelines to maintain sustainability of shallow aquifers for intended uses and ecological functions of the water which they contain. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-1 Nondischarge Permitting and Enforcement |
As the population of North Carolina grows and the waste assimilation capacity of the state's streams is diminished, nondischarge alternatives for treated wastewater disposal will become more prevalent. The nondischarge permitting program consists of all wastewater treatment, disposal, and/or collection systems that do not discharge directly to surface waters. The exception is wastewater disposal permits issued by DEH/Onsite Section for subsurface septic systems. Nondischarge systems are typically designed to treat wastes through land application techniques and therefore may contribute loadings as nonpoint sources. North Carolina regulations require that applicants for NPDES permits must first consider nondischarge alternatives. The state has over 1339 existing treatment and disposal nondischarge permits for activities including groundwater remediation, residuals disposal and reuse, spray irrigation, evaporation, infiltration and recycling. These complex systems often require intensive evaluation and site work and their numbers are expected to continue to increase. In addition, the state realized an increase in the number and size of animal feeding operations in the 1990’s. The state has approximately 2,400 permitted animal operations and the greatest number of large animal operations (i.e. concentrated animal feeding operations as defined in 40 CFR Part 122.21) in Region 4. More information on each program area is provided below. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-2 Clean Lakes Program |
This request would fund lake water quality assessments according to Section 314(a)1. The assessments would use monitoring results to establish trends in lake water quality in the State. Specific evaluations would be conducted on a series of at least 20 different lakes using methods previously approved and funded through EPA Region IV Clean Lakes Projects. Several lakes will be evaluated more intensively than others due to nutrient loads, which may have lead to unacceptable eutrophic conditions. The State will list the sampling results along with use assessments in the update of the Environmental Sciences Section’s Use Assessment Documents and the North Carolina Integrated Report. The results will also be used to gage the impacts of any restoration efforts being conducted in the lake’s watersheds. Lakes with nutrient management strategies such as Falls of the Neuse and B. Everett Jordan Reservoirs will be sampled to provide baseline information as nutrient management strategies are implemented in the watersheds |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-4 Erosion and Sedimentation Control |
The Department and Commission are charged with enforcement of the Act and education of the regulated community and general public about erosion and sedimentation control. Funding from the FY06 319(h) grant provides continued support in the form of one full-time staff person, the Sediment Education Specialist, for the education and training program mandated by the Act. One of the fundamental responsibilities of this position is to provide training related to the State Sedimentation and Erosion Control Program and design materials for professional engineers, architects, surveyors, contractors and regulated community. Technical assistance is offered through design manuals and design workshops conducted for engineers and consultants, contractors, developers, homebuilders, and elected officials. Another objective of the program is to provide education on erosion and sedimentation control to the general public. Technical expertise has been and will continue to be provided to education professionals to help implement sedimentation pollution awareness in public schools and colleges. Finally, training materials and, where possible, hands-on training has been given to teachers to take back to their students. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-4 Erosion and Sedimentation Control |
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources administers this mandatory program under the guidance of the Sedimentation Control Commission. The Department and Commission are charged with enforcement of the Act and education of the regulated community and general public about erosion and sedimentation control. Funding from the FY06 319(h) grant provides continued support in the form of one full-time staff person, the Sediment Education Specialist, for the education and training program mandated by the Act. One of the fundamental responsibilities of this position is to provide training related to the State Sedimentation and Erosion Control Program and design materials for professional engineers, architects, surveyors, contractors and regulated community. Technical assistance is offered through design manuals and design workshops conducted for engineers and consultants, contractors, developers, homebuilders, and elected officials. Another objective of the program is to provide education on erosion and sedimentation control to the general public. Technical expertise has been and will continue to be provided to education professionals to help implement sedimentation pollution awareness in public schools and colleges. Finally, training materials and, where possible, hands-on training has been given to teachers to take back to their students. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-5 Agricultural NPS Pollution |
The NPS Planning Coordinator is the lead person in assisting SWCDs across the state; in helping to identify water quality needs specific to their individual counties. This is accomplished by using information in DWQ Basinwide Water Quality Plans, the 303(d), and the 305(b) lists. He/she will assist districts in the writing and development of grants, for EPA Section 319(h), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF), and other funders that are focused on water quality protection/enhancement and environmental education. This individual is also responsible in the writing and development of DSWC water quality grants to EPA 319, CWMTF, and other funding sources. This position delivers EPA 319 outreach efforts to the districts across the state, by holding workshops and site visits with districts. This individual will work closely with the NC SWCDs, the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), EPA, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), and other divisions within the Department of Environment & Natural Resources (DENR) to promote and implement water quality efforts in the state of NC. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-6 Tar Pamlico Basin Coordinator |
The Association agrees to continue funding a Division of Soil and Water staff position for administration of offset funds and technical assistance for implementation of other agricultural management activities under the nutrient strategy. Also, during 2000 and 2001, a set of rules for agriculture and other nonpoint sources in the Basin became effective. Agricultural operations in aggregate are required to achieve their own aggregate 30% reduction in nitrogen loading from 1991 levels and holding of phosphorus loading to those levels. These controls are required separate from and in addition to any reductions agricultural operations may achieve through ACSP BMP implementation to offset the point sources’ exceedences. Another nonpoint source rule, the Nutrient Management rule, largely targets agricultural fertilizer application, requiring applicators to either take training or have a plan in place for all lands to which they apply fertilizer. The Coordinator is expected to facilitate outreach that will help farmers comply with the rule. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| B-8 Waste Management NPS Program |
During 2004, the NPS Program cooperated with NCSU and the USGS to submit a 319 grant application to evaluate the effectiveness of phytoremediation to reduce a petroleum discharge to surface water from a site contaminated with petroleum fuel. The FY 05 project was funded by the NPS Workgroup. This project should provide a very detailed evaluation of a phytoremediation system to clean up petroleum hydrocarbons in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Phytoremediation is particularly well suited for use to clean up groundwater that discharges to surface water due to shallow depth to groundwater in these areas. This research should lend credence to an innovative and nearly self sustaining technology that has the potential to reduce remediation costs at candidate sites. In turn phytoremediation will hopefully allow for the clean-up of more sites in North Carolina, thus achieving the ultimate goal of reducing the discharge of NPS pollution to the environment.
The NPS program will also work with the USGS, NCSU and the UST Section to evaluate the use of sulfate to enhance the anaerobic degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons at a UST site. Enhanced degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons has long been performed by using aerobic processes, but recent research has shown that the addition of sulfate to some hydrocarbon contaminated aquifers can stimulate the growth hydrocarbon degrading, sulfate reducing microorganisms. If proven successful and adopted by the UST Section of DWM, this means of hydrocarbon degradation will offer another low cost option to clean up candidate contaminated UST sites. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| C-5 Public Education, Monitoring & Preliminary Watershed Planning in a Degraded Trout Stream in Jackson County |
This project lays the groundwork of public education, data collection, assessment, planning, and early action to initiate significant water quality improvement in Scotts Creek, classified as trout habitat. The creek is degraded by elevated suspended sediments and fecal bacteria; and most of the proposed activities match those we are beginning on nearby Savannah Creek. The monitoring actions will produce baseline data so that improvements from subsequent restoration work can be quantified and documented. The proposed project is divided into three sequential components: 1) monitoring combined with innovative public education, 2) watershed action planning, and 3) early actions to reduce erosion and turbidity. The key educational tool will be a public, real-time turbidity meter, which consists of a roadside sign located next to the creek that shows the current turbidity measurement. People driving by Scotts Creek will have instant access to a prime measure of water quality. Monitoring includes baseline data to determine the relationship between trout species and turbidity. While not a controlled experiment, the data produced by the proposed fish IBI survey, when combined with the detailed turbidity data, will provide the basis for linking turbidity and abundance of trout and other species. In the third component, we will initiate early actions to reduce erosion by providing new capabilities to county citizens and to the erosion control inspector. Those tools will be a hydroseeding service combined with innovative contracting, a silt-fence trenching machine, and vegetation for stream-bank stabilization. These new capabilities will be provide the beginning steps to reducing NPS pollution in Scotts Creek. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| C-6 French Broad Training Center (Western NC Technical Resource Center) |
NCSU proposes the continuation of the Western North Carolina French Broad Training Center as a resource center for the French Broad Basin and other areas of Western North Carolina to continue to provide expertise and technical assistance for Low Impact Development and Sediment and Erosion Control strategies. In addition to serving as a regional resource, the project deliverables will include three educational conferences, four field tours, and two projects. The projects will be completed using external funding, including federal, local and state funding outside of EPA 319 for implementation and administration funding.NCSU will also provide technical assistance for innovative implementation practices of stormwater, sediment and erosion control, and low impact design. Preference will be given to local governments and projects that result in measurable water quality impacts and public access. NCSU will not perform plan review services, but will extend the latest scientifically based research. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| C-8 Stream Steward Campaign: Targeting Two Threatened Creeks in Chatham County |
The Haw River Assembly seeks to address some of the water quality problems in its own backyard by targeting two threatened creeks, Dry Creek and Pokeberry Creek in Chatham County. Dry Creek was Fully Supporting in the 2000 Basinwide Plan. The Draft 2005 Cape Fear River Basinwide Plan states that “Dry Creek is currently Impaired for aquatic life due to a Poor benthic community rating.” Dry Creek is expected to be added to the State’s 303(d) list of Impaired waters as Non-supporting for aquatic life. Pokeberry Creek is currently considered to be Supporting, but the 2003 Cape Fear Assessment Plan suggests that there is evidence that ”the benthic communities in Pokeberry Creek may be declining in this rapidly developing area.” These steams are part of the watershed of the Haw River arm of Jordan Lake, and will be included in the nutrient load reduction targets proposed by the NC Division of Water Quality under the Draft Jordan Lake Nutrient Management Strategy and TMDL. Both Dry Creek and Pokeberry Creek have some agricultural uses, with rapid conversion of land to housing development and commercial uses. Major housing developments (Briar Chapel, Chapel Ridge and Meadowview) have been recently approved by Chatham County and will add thousands of new houses to these two creek basins in the next few years. These developments will rely on on-site spray application of wastewater.The project we are proposing will put us in critical areas undergoing new threats to water quality. We plan to work with our Cooperative Extension partners to monitor and prevent further degradation of these creeks from new sources of pollution. In addition to conducting annual monitoring of sites on these two creeks, we will be conducting visual stream assessments with landowners along both creeks and documenting macroinvertebrate counts throughout their stream length. This will provide us the with the opportunity to educate landowners on stream stewardship practices as well to identify potential sites for restoration, installation of best management practices and preservation. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| I-4 Technical Assistance for the NPS Nutrient Sensitive Waters Strategies |
Based on the NSW designation and the TMDL requirement on the Upper New Hope Arm, the Division of Water Quality has proposed a Nonpoint Source Nutrient Strategy for the Jordan Reservoir. This rulemaking process is underway. The projected timeframe for the final rule to become effective is June 2006. The technicians will play a vital role in the implementation of the upcoming Jordan Lake NPS Nutrient Strategy. The proposed strategy is modeled after the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Strategies therefore the completion of the baseline and the development and implementation local strategies will be required. Our long-term objective is to actively engage the technicians with local governments and Soil and Water Conservation Districts in addressing all of their nonpoint source concerns. Through education and outreach programs as well as technical assistance to all landowners, these technicians should be able to become a vital asset to the County. Demonstrating these technicians’ attributes to the County will be a crucial element in achieving the local governments continual funding of the position. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| I-5 Identifying Sources of Fecal Contamination and TMDL Development in the Swanquarter Bay |
To choose the most proper model for TMDL study in the Swanquarter Bay, we aim to identify the simplest conceptual model that represents the most important mechanisms controlling the fate of fecal coliforms, and to select the most useful and effective methodologies for calculating load and waste load allocations. The tidal prism water quality model is hence selected for the proposed TMDL studies in the Swanquarter Bay.
Tidal Prism Water Quality Model. The tidal prism water quality model (TPWQM) was developed by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in the late 1970s (Kuo and Neilson, 1989) to provide a tool for water quality management of small coastal basins. The TPWQM simulates the physical transport processes in terms of the concept of tidal flushing. The implementation of the concept in numerical computation is simple and straightforward, and thus ideal for small coastal basins including those with a high degree of branching (e.g. the Swanquarter Bay. It has been employed by Virginia Water Control Board for point source waste load allocations, by local planning district for nonpoint source management, and by Virginia DEQ, MDE, and NC DENR for fecal coliform TMDL studies in small coastal basins. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| I-6 Ivy River Sedimentation Control BMP Implementation Project |
The Madison County SWCD proposes in this project to accelerate BMP implementation to reduce sediment coming from agriculture and urban land uses through various conservation practices that will be installed through this project. A monitoring plan will be developed that will involve UNCA, Mars Hill College and DWQ to show the effects of the BMP implementation in the watershed. This will be part of the 9 step implementation plan that will be developed for the project. BMP’s will be installed on eroding sites, producing sediment through a ranking system that will be developed by the SWCD and local NRCS staff. Reduction in sediment will be achieved through practice implementation. Conservation plans will be developed and contracts written addressing the highest ranked areas. This will be an ongoing process with the plans reranked with new applications and contracts on a quarterly basis. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| I-8 An Integrated Approach to Watershed Management Planning and Implementation in Selected Watersheds of the Falls Lake Reservoir |
This project is to develop and implement a watershed restoration plan on a 303(d) listed stream and to take the information obtained during this study and carry it forward to watershed planning and implementation on an anticipated future impaired waterbody, the Falls Lake Reservoir. Through partnership processes, we will develop and implement a water quality monitoring plan, identify current non-point sources of pollution, anticipate future sources, develop a restoration plan, and select implementation project(s) that will be carried out to maintain and enhance water quality through Best Management Practices installation and land preservation techniques. This project will also integrate the many activities ongoing in the Upper Neuse including the Division of Water Quality’s increased monitoring of Falls Lake, the Nutrient Management Strategy, and the update of the 2007 Neuse River Basinwide Plan, US Geological Survey’s work on Stormwater and Watershed Evaluation Tools and the compilation of existing monitoring being done in the Upper Neuse Basin, an upcoming wetland and riparian corridor restoration project by NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program, and coordination with implementation of Wake County’s Watershed Management and Open Space Plans including a proposed landscape analysis to be completed by the Upper Neuse River Basin Association. |
North Carolina
|
2006 |
| I-9 Watershed Restoration Plan Development and Implementation |
The goal of incremental funds is to restore waters impaired by nonpoint source pollution. These are waters, monitored by the state or others, in which certain uses such as fishing, swimming or shellfish harvesting have been limited or prohibited because of excessive amounts of one or more identified water pollutants. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| NCB-1 Tar Pamlico Rapid Response Team |
To relieve these constraints and provide more intensive and routine assessment of water quality issues in the Lower Neuse and Pamlico River and surrounding area, a satellite office of DWQ was created for a Neuse River Rapid Response Team in New Bern in June of 1997. In addition, a four-member team was formed in Washington in June of 1998 for the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. These teams are responsible for investigating environmental events such as fish kills, algal blooms, and other environmental problems. Other duties include water quality monitoring in the area, assisting USGS in maintenance of continuous monitors, citizen complaint investigations, buffer rule investigations and enhanced communications within the local area. Formation of this group has freed up resources in the Washington and Wilmington Regional Offices to allow similar response activities in other estuarine waters.
Response includes collection of pertinent data and immediate transfer of those data to decision makers in the areas of fisheries, environment, and human health. Scientific knowledge regarding harmful algae is rapidly evolving and decisions on actions associated with human health are in flux as well. The information flow developed for these teams is immediately transferred to the regional offices in Washington and Wilmington. |
North Carolina |
2006 |
| Enoree River Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Project |
The Enoree River basin (8-digit HUC 03050108) is located in parts of Union, Spartanburg, Newberry, Laurens, and Greenville counties encompassing 24 14-digit HUCs in the Broad River basin. Twenty-three water quality monitoring stations in the watershed have been placed on the South Carolina §303(d) list of impaired waters for violations of the fecal coliform bacteria standard. The 730 square mile basin is composed of mostly forest (70%) with some pastureland (10%) and cropland (10%). The basin has several municipalities that have or may receive Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permits. There are 10 active continuous point sources discharging fecal coliform bacteria in the Enoree River basin of South Carolina. The Project addresses several strategies for TMDL implementation through the development and promotion of measures focused at reducing fecal coliform contamination from non-point sources. Reduction of fecal coliform bacteria pollution load to Enoree River with impact over the three 11-digit hydrologic watersheds, through agricultural, rural residential septic systems and urban storm water reductions. |
South Carolina |
2006 |
| Little Pee Dee River Watershed Water Quality Improvement Project |
The Little Pee Dee River watershed above its confluence with the Pee Dee River and the Catfish Creek Watershed have been targeted for fecal coliform bacteria reduction by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC). Recreational and Aquatic Life Uses are not supported or partially supported in portions of the watershed due to fecal coliform bacteria excursions as well as dissolved oxygen problems. Increasing turbidity, pH fluctuations, and increasing fecal coliform bacteria trends are also seen in areas of the watershed. The presence of fecal coliform bacteria in aquatic environments indicates that the water has been contaminated with the fecal material of man or other warm-blooded animals. It is assumed that water bodies possessing high concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria may also be contaminated by pathogens, or disease producing bacteria or viruses, which can also exist in fecal materials. Some waterborne diseases associated with fecal material include typhoid fever, viral and bacterial gastroenteritis, and hepatitis A. Fecal contamination is frequently used as an indicator of potential health risks for individuals exposed to this water. Fecal coliform bacteria may occur in ambient water as a result of the overflow of domestic sewage or nonpoint sources (NPS) of human and animal waste. High fecal coliform bacteria concentrations in both watersheds, therefore, a concern because of closed proximity to large human populations, such as City of Mullins and Marion. |
South Carolina |
2006 |
| Nonpoint Source Compliance Inspections |
The Nonpoint Source Management Program identifies animal waste as a significant nonpoint source threat to state surface and ground waters. In South Carolina, the majority of these wastes are manure from dairy, beef, poultry, and swine operations. |
South Carolina |
2006 |
| TMDL Development and Implementation |
SCDHEC uses a geographically based watershed approad for water quality management activities, known as the Watershed Water Quality Management Program (WWQMP). This program addresses point and nonpoint source pollution and allows water quality to be examined in a holistic manner. This project continues this program by providing staff support to identify NPS pollution problems, develop TMDLs, and develop GIS applications. |
South Carolina |
2006 |
| Watershed Characterization & TMDL Implementation for Chapel Branch Creek |
Although the study watershed is relatively small (~ 1600 ha), there are multiple land uses within the drainage area that need an accurate assessment for potential pollution sources. Identification of each potential source involves separate audiences, and resolution of sources will be important to regional acceptance of the TMDL development. Therefore, the process proposed in the study involves a strong partnership of stakeholders integrated into both TMDL development and implementation. Stakeholder “buy in” to the TMDL becomes a function of ownership, from data collection for TMDL development using data analysis and modeling to implementation of best management practices (BMPs) to successfully meet TMDL goals. Accordingly, this project, if awarded, has a very high chance of success because of a strong and continued support from major stakeholders like Santee Cooper (SC), Town of Santee (TS), Santee State Park (SCDPRT) and others as well as a joint collaboration of experienced and committed scientists/engineers. |
South Carolina |
2006 |
| Anderson County SCD - Bullrun Creek |
According to the TN 2004 303(d) list, parts of this watershed are classified as impaired due to sedimentation, pathogens, channelization, and habitat alteration. The Bullrun Creek Restoration Partnership was formed in 1999 in response to requests for financial and technical assistance to implement BMPs in the Bullrun Creek watershed. Interest was high due to 303(d) listings in the watershed. The following is a history of accomplishments since the partnership’s formation.
The Bullrun Creek Watershed has diverse land usage, and thus multiple options for improving the watershed’s water resources. Funds requested through this proposal would enable partners to implement the Bullrun Creek Watershed Plan. This plan describes a comprehensive approach that addresses each of the dominant sources of pollution that impact the watershed. This project should take four years to implement, from the time that funding starts. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| Conasauga River Alliance - Mill & Ball Play Creeks |
Development of a watershed-based plan for Mill and Ball Play Creeks will use the 2005 (draft) proposed total maximum daily load (TMDL) study by TDEC for pathogens and the Final 2004 303(d) List. These will serve as the technical reference point to develop an implementation strategy and plan to reclaim stream quality in Mill and Ball Play Creeks. Additionally, TDEC will do a Group 1 follow-up watershed monitoring in the Conasauga River watershed starting in summer 2006, and make these new data available for the plan development.
A watershed-based plan for Mill and Ball Play creeks in Tennessee will complement a larger watershed effort by CRA. Two section 319 grants in Georgia are in-progress. The first 319 grant started in 2000, is a BMP demonstration project. It will end in 2006, and will have installed 30+ projects to build awareness of river-friendly practices to address agricultural NPS, failing septic systems, eroding unpaved back roads, limestone spring protection, stormwater treatment, and urban streambank protection. The second 319 grant (to be awarded in 2006) is an implementation project to reduce pathogen impairments from septic systems in 2 stream segments on Georgia’s impaired stream listings (303d). Targets have been set by a TMDL developed by Georgia EPD for fecal coliforms in the Georgia stream segments. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| Cumberland River Basin Watershed Stakeholder Meetings Process |
Starting in 1998 The Cumberland River Compact decided that to better coordinate activities in the Cumberland River Basin, there should be some sort of forum so that representatives from the watershed groups that we have helped to form could meet together to exchange ideas while enhancing their education, communication and problem solving strategies in watershed restoration.
The Cumberland Basin Council is now having quarterly meetings that include new technical skills and information in addition to time for learning from each other’s experiences and expertise. As new watershed groups are formed in the Cumberland River Basin, they will be invited to attend the Cumberland Basin Council meetings.
As we expand the scope of the Cumberland Basin Council, we’ll be seeking input from each of the organizations to meet their specific needs in order to remove streams from the State’s 303(d) list of impaired streams. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| Giles Co. SCD Robertson Fork Watershed Plan Development |
TDEC’s research indicating that Robertson Fork Creek watershed was impaired due to agriculture is the basis for this project. There are no recorded federally threatened or endangered species in this area, though the Appalachian Bug Bane and the Butternut tree are listed as threatened for the state of Tennessee and the Common Barn Owl is listed as declining on the state list. We are currently researching possible ways to utilize this program in assisting in the recovery of these species. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| Hull-York Lakeland (RC&D) Council - Post Oak Creek Watershed Plan |
Most of the agriculture in this watershed consists of beef operations with the primary concerns being overgrazed pastures, unrestricted livestock access to the stream and removal of riparian vegetation. There is evidence that siltation and removal of riparian vegetation can be attributed to agriculture, but there is no indication identifying to what extent agriculture has contributed. This project will identify agriculture’s contribution to water quality impairment as well as what practices are needed, and where they are needed. The ultimate goal for this project is to remove Post Oak Creek Watershed from the 303(d) list and use it as an example of the level of success that can be gained through voluntary efforts and effective partnerships. This watershed lies within a primarily agricultural area, and the cause of impairment is due to agriculture. We have good reason to believe that once this plan is completed and followed by a BMP implementation grant, residents in the watershed will have a heightened and sustained interest in continuing to manage their watershed. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| TDEC Monitoring for Water Quality Assessment |
This project will monitor watersheds located throughout the state General qualitative assessment at the watershed level (BioRecon) will identify areas for further attention. Specific monitoring [single habitat approach (RBP3) and chemical analyses] at sites identified in BioRecon will provide more detailed information about the causes of NPS impacts and Fluvial geomorphology techniques will provide information about erosion and sediment of reference and impacted streams. All selected sites will be mapped on GIS. Data, strategies, and watershed plans will be shared with cooperating organizations. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| The Nature Conservancy - Big Rock Creek Watershed Project |
The proposed Big Rock Creek Project is a continuation of an EPA 319 grant, which was awarded in 2001. During the first grant cycle, the Center for Watershed Protection assisted The Nature Conservancy in the completion of a Watershed Management Plan for Big Rock Creek. The intent of this proposed project is to capitalize upon the momentum we currently enjoy in the watershed by continuing to assist farmers in implementing agricultural BMPs and to focus more effort and resources on the urban issues which continue to impact the water quality of this stream. The broad scope of our work in this watershed will continue to mitigate a number of pollutants by addressing the sources and threats cited in the 303(d) list. The long-range goals of the project are consistent with the TDA-NPS long term goals with particular emphasis on goals 1., 3., and 5. Further funding for this project will enable us to continue the remediation of the impacts of all nonpoint sources and assist in restoring Big Rock Creek to a fully supporting condition. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| TN Environmental Council - Rutherford Creek Restoration Plan |
The Duck River Watershed, 8-digit HUC code 06040003: program focus on implementation of BMPs and outreach/education and participation in watershed-based plan in the Duck River, Rutherford Creek subwatershed. This includes Parts of the city of Spring Hill and Williamson and Maury County. Primary focus will be on BMP implementation in the following sub watersheds: Rutherford Creek (TN06040003034-2000), McCutcheon Creek (TN06040003034-0300), Grassy Branch (TN06040003034-0410), and Crooked Creek (TN06040003034-0700). Secondary focus will include working with Land Trust for TN to promote conservation easements. sedimentation due to development. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| University of TN at Knoxville - Oostanaula Creek Watershed Restoration Plan |
This project will seek to identify the sources of pathogens, sediment and nutrient loading within the Oostanaula Creek Watershed and develop a watershed action plan that will direct Phase 2 implementation of actions to restore the creek to the condition of fully supporting its designated uses and remove the creek from the 303(d) list of impaired streams. |
Tennessee |
2006 |
| Benthic Taxonomic Identification and Analyses/Database Development |
This project will target total maximum daily loads (TMDL) and watershed-based plan nonpoint source impaired subwatershed(s) with implemented management measures. Water quality trend-data will be collected to assess the effectiveness of cumulative management practices implemented in impaired watershed(s). |
Alabama |
2005 |
| Hurricane Creek (Dowling Branch) Restoration Project |
This project will provide the funds for a small scale (a-i) watershed plan and for the implementation of agricultural BMPs. |
Alabama |
2005 |
| Implementation of Watershed-based Plans |
This project will provide grant funding to develop and implement watershed based plans that incorporate FY04 Section 319 grant guideline “a-I” components of a good watershed based plan. It will target grant funding to address water quality issues and identify regulatory and voluntary incentive-based solutions to the most pressing water quality problems. Watershed plans will be developed to provide goals, objectives, and timelines to achieve water quality standards as soon as possible. Implementation of the plans will speed restoration of impaired waters on the Section 303(d) List. This project provides a fundamental and essential basis for effective and efficient implementation of TMDLs because it specifically targets approved TMDL sources and causes and pollutant load reductions needed to achieve water quality standards. |
Alabama |
2005 |
| Indian Creek Watershed Restoration Project |
Indian Creek has two separate impaired segments. This project will address the headwaters portion, listed from Hwy. 74 to its source (5.95 impaired miles per TMDL model calculations. It encompasses approximately 23,981 acres (26% forest, 24% cropland, 20.4% pastureland, 27.3% urban, 0.09% water, 2.2% wetlands, and 0.09% other). Increased pressures due to urban sprawl are increasingly threatening the watershed.
Organic enrichment and dissolved oxygen-depleting pollutants from failing septic treatment systems, agricultural practices (e.g., livestock operations/nutrient management, row crops, pasture/haylands, etc.), and naturally occurring sources (e.g., domestic pets and wildlife) are impairing Indian Creek, as well as sediment from agricultural practices and construction activities. |
Alabama |
2005 |
| Phase II - Brier Fork/Beaverdam Creek Watershed Restoration Project |
The water use classification for both streams is Fish and Wildlife. Erosion and sediment from agriculture and land development are impairing Brier Fork and Beaverdam Creek. Agricultural sources include both row crops (primarily cotton) and pasture grazing. Goal: This project provides funding for voluntary incentive-based mechanisms for landowners/landusers to use in reducing nonpoint source pollutant loadings to Brier Fork and Beaverdam Creek. The goals of this project are as follows:
a) Implement a watershed-based protection plan that incorporates applicable “a-i” Section 319 grant guideline components for an effective watershed protection plan; b.) Implement the watershed-based plan to address nonpoint source pollutants such as sediment in the Brier Fork/ Beaverdam Creek Watershed; c) Enhance and protect water quality in the watershed; and d) Remove Brier Fork/Beaverdam Creek from the Section 303(d) list of impaired waters. |
Alabama |
2005 |
| Water Quality Coordinator and Education/Outreach Specialist for the State Soil and Water Conservation Committee |
This project provides resources to support the State Soil and Water Conservation Committee (SWCC) and the 67 Soil and Water Conservation Districts in their efforts to protect water quality and enhance watershed protection through their locally-led conservation programs. This project fosters citizen input into watershed assessment, planning, implementation and other resource protection decision-making processes. It assists stakeholders in identifying potential problems from nonpoint sources and working with the Districts to correct the problems and support the overall conservation program. The project plays an important role in federal, state, and local watershed protection strategies by providing agencies a more effective and efficient mechanism to obtain the greatest benefits from limited resource protection funding. Information provided by this project also facilitates Section 303(d) and Section 305(b) reporting, as well as TMDL and watershed-based plan development and implementation efforts. The agricultural Water Quality Coordinator (WQC) serves as important link between the SWCC and its partners (i.e., ADEM, NRCS, RC&D, Districts, etc.,) on NPS pollution management measures. The WQC facilitates all Section 319 project cooperative agreements with the SWCC and is responsible for implementation of the Community Based Environmental Protection watershed assessment project. The assessment involves more than 600 watersheds in Alabama and requires the WQC to facilitate citizen advisory committees in each county of the state. In addition, the WQC is involved with implementation of the AFO/CAFO registration process and in a variety of other NPS programs and committees including erosion and sedimentation control, onsite wastewater treatment systems, and the statewide Clean Water Partnership Program. This project also establishes an Education/Outreach (E/O) Specialist position. The E/O Specialist will provide direct assistance to the WQC and to the 67 SWCC Districts. |
Alabama |
2005 |
| IFAS Vegetable and Row Crops BMP Implementation |
This project is directed at the development, implementation, and demonstration of water quality/quantity BMPs for vegetable and row crop producers that are intended to achieve pollution in the receiving water bodies. The BMP effort is focused on achieving environmental goals in partnership with the growers. Full implementation of appropriate BMPs should decrease the off-site effects of vegetable production systems on water bodies of the state. |
Florida |
2005 |
| Indian River County Main Relief Canal Pollution Control Structure |
A large treatment structure will be constructed on the Main Relief Canal in Vero Beach that utilizes vortex techonology and bar screens to remove suspended solids and floating vegetative debris from canal water flowing to the Indian River Lagoon. The vortex unit will be integrated with a self-cleaning fixed bar screen and traveling rake to remove large masses of vegetative debris such as hyacinths, water lettuce, duckweed and grasses and floating trash before the water enters the vortex unit. The project is anticipated to reduce TSS by 60% or 1,207,989 lbs. per year and TP by over 40% or 7,742 lbs. per year. A monitoring program will be conducted to accurately assess the removal efficiency of this treatment system. A public education and awareness program will be incorporated with the construction project to help trash and vegetative debris input to the drainage system. |
Florida |
2005 |
| Lake Okeechobee FRESP |
The requested 319 Program Funds would be used to analyze hydrologic and water quality data associated with operation of the WMAs over a period of three years. Flow and water quality data will be used to evaluate and demonstrate the WMAs’ effectiveness. Grower education events will be organized to disseminate the study result. Results from water management alternatives will be published in the agricultural trade magazines, UF-IFAS extension publications, and refereed journals. |
Florida |
2005 |
| NUMAPS Nutrient Management Tools for Citrus and Sugarcane Production |
An expert system that assists growers in selection and application of BMPs related to water and nutrition in ridge citrus (NUMAPS) will be expanded and extended to flatwood citrus and sugarcane. |
Florida |
2005 |
| Implementing the Agricultural Components of TMDLs in the Upper Satilla River Basin (GSWCC) |
This project serves to implement the agribultural components of TMDL Plans for 102 miles of impaired streams in the Upper Satilla River Basin, specifically for fecal coliform and dissolved oxygen. |
Georgia |
2005 |
| Soque River Watershed Protection Plan Implemetation |
In response to problems already identified in several stream segments and threats from rapid development and other sources, a broad coalition of groups, known as the Soque River Watershed Partnership (the Partnership), joined together to perform a watershed-wide assessment of surface water quality. This assessment has been funded by a 319(h) grant awarded to the City of Clarkesville, which began in 2004 and will conclude in February, 2008. The final phase of that first-round 319 grant-funded project is to complete a Watershed Protection Plan, through which the Partnership can address the highest priority threats and problems for water quality and watershed integrity that have been identified.
The implementation of our current assessment and coordination of the Partnership’s activities, including preparation of the Watershed Protection Plan, have been accomplished through an efficient working relationship among several members of the coalition. |
Georgia |
2005 |
| Upper Suwannee River Partnership Project |
The Upper Suwannee River Partnership (USRP) will continue working with the agricultural community and to expand the voluntary pollutant management program to include municipalities and a research component in the Georgia portion of the Suwannee Basin. The USRP was created in 2004 to proactively address agricultural water quality issues in the Georgia portion of the Suwannee Basin, so regulatory actions would not be necessary.
Over the next three (3) years, the USRP will develop and implement press releases, newsletters, workshops/field days, municipal activities, recognition events, a water quality monitoring component, and the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). As a result of these activities, the stakeholders will be more involved and informed on water quality issues within the Suwannee Basin. These efforts will also provide a positive means for Georgia to protect and preserve our Suwannee Basin from issues such as excessive nutrients and sedimentation. |
Georgia |
2005 |
| Eagle Creek Straightpipe Abatement and Education Project |
From Glencoe upstream to Folsom, Eagle Creek is polluted by fecal bacteria to the point that it is not safe for swimming. (Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, 2003) This project will develop a Watershed Based Plan (WBP) to address all known pollutants in the Eagle Creek Watershed, and will include components which address the 9 criteria (a through i) for WBP as established by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2003). It will reduce the nonpoint source pollutants in Eagle Creek tributaries Ten Mile Creek and a tributary to Ten Mile Creek, Arnolds Creek to alleviate downstream pollution levels, with a limited budget and on a manageable scale. This project will demonstrate that improvement to water quality can be achieved by targeting watersheds of a limited size (less than 50,000 acres) through a combined approach: a grant incentive program to upgrade problem onsite wastewater systems; measured and focused public education encouraging agricultural and construction best management practices; water quality education in communities and local schools; and measured, focused community efforts to increase the appreciation of the recreational and aesthetic value of the Eagle Creek Basin. |
Kentucky |
2005 |
| Oakahay Water Quality Improvement Project |
The primary objective of this project will be to implement selected Best Management Practices (BMPs) on targeted areas in the Oakahay Creek Watershed that will result in reduced sediment and nutrient loadings from agricultural nonpoint sources. Of primary concern is sedimentation from crop land and pasture land as well as nutrient loadings from animal operations in the watershed. Soils in the watershed are very erosive, with sheet and gully erosion occurring on sloping crop land and pasture land. Erosion is occurring from crop land at the rate of 7 tons per acre per year and from pastureland land at the rate of 3 tons per acre per year in the project area. Sediment and nutrients contained in runoff is entering Oakahay Creek causing degradation of the resource base.
The erosion of the soil resource base removes nutrients, reduces water holding capacity, undermines plant rooting systems, reduces the soil’s organic matter content, reduces soil tilth and degrades water quality within the project area. |
Mississippi |
2005 |
| Steele Bayou Water Quality Improvement Project |
Delta F.A.R.M. (Farmers Advocating Resource Management), through the B. F. Smith Foundation, proposes to reduce sedimentation and non-point source pollution in Steele Bayou (HUC 08030209) in order to improve the water quality and fisheries in the stream. This will be done by installing structural and/or vegetative conservation measures that have been proven by science to reduce sedimentation and non-point source pollution. The installed practices will be economically feasible for landowners and producers in the watershed and not affect their current production systems or their farms’ profitability. Delta F.A.R.M. is requesting $300,000.00 of federal funds for this project and will match these funds with $235,000.00 of non-federal funds and/or in kind ($535,000.00 total). |
Mississippi |
2005 |
| B-5 Agricultural NPS Pollution Control |
One of the fundamental responsibilities of this position is to provide training related to the State Sedimentation and Erosion Control Program and design materials for professional engineers, architects, surveyors, contractors and regulated community. Technical assistance is offered through design manuals and design workshops conducted for engineers and consultants, contractors, developers, homebuilders, and elected officials. Another objective of the program is to provide education on erosion and sedimentation control to the general public. Technical expertise has been and will continue to be provided to education professionals to help implement sedimentation pollution awareness in public schools and colleges. Finally, training materials and, where possible, hands-on training has been given to teachers to take back to their students. The Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section and the Sedimentation Control Commission have set funds for educational materials aside. However, these funds cannot be used for staff positions. Therefore, Section 319(h) funding is needed to support the Sediment Education Specialist to administer the education program. This position is located in the Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| C-9 Taxonomy and Water Pollution Ecology of Aquatic Insects |
The objective of this project is to illustrate the effectiveness of 319 watershed projects and various land-use practices on the aquatic ecology of stream systems. Concurrent with this effort, a workshop series will be developed that instructs individuals on the pollution ecology of aquatic insect larvae. These workshops also will instruct individuals on taxonomic identification and recognition of these organisms (EPT families primarily). Collection locations will be selected to correspond with 319 project sites or other watershed studies when possible. Not only are these insects used to detect water pollution problems, but are also used to determine if streams are perennial features, are proposed for use in stream restoration projects as success criteria and are frequently used to test efficiencies of best management practices (or BMPs). The overall intent of the workshops is to introduce the participants to the basic ecology and taxonomy of aquatic insects. This workshop series will instruct the participants on use of dichotomous keys and identification skills needed to recognize families of aquatic insects (primarily Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera, or mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies). |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| I-1 Southeast White Oak River Shellfish Restoration Project |
This project will document how tidal creeks that flow to the southeast White Oak River have become impaired by elevated levels of fecal coliform pollution, and what needs to be done to restore the creeks’ designated use of shellfish harvesting. These goals will be accomplished by: (1) documenting sources and transport mechanisms that deliver elevated levels of fecal coliform to the impaired waters; (2) developing TMDLs for Dubling Creek, Boathouse Creek and an embayment south of Boathouse Creek; (3) devising Watershed Implementation Plans that adhere to EPA’s 9 Key Elements for watershed management for all three TMDL waters in (2) and White Oak River near the NC24 bridge* (44 acres); (4) conducting landowner and citizen education and outreach to inform them about this project and how they can be good stewards of water quality; and (5) identifying at least 24 sites for BMP installation (6 BMPs per impaired water in (3)). A second phase of this project will be needed to implement the recommended BMPs. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| I-2 Lewis Creek Restoration Project |
In Henderson County, NC, Mud Creek and two of its tributaries, Clear Creek and Bat Fork, are on the state’s 303(d) list of impaired waterbodies. This proposal targets the Lewis Creek watershed for water quality improvement efforts. With this grant we seek to:• Complete a nine-element Watershed Restoration Implementation Plan.• Provide funding for three years for a watershed coordinator/project manager to write the nine-element Watershed Restoration Implementation Plan and carry out a targeted education strategy aimed at securing cooperation for restoration projects. The request includes funds for accompanying educational materials.• Provide smart sprayer technology to apple growers in the Lewis Creek Watershed for whom Agricultural Cost Share funding is currently unavailable. This BMP is aimed at reducing pesticide use, and thus reducing pesticide drift and run-off.• Provide funding for removing abandoned orchards to eliminate a source of pests to adjacent active orchards, or using pest scouts to guide pesticide spraying, or using insect pheremones to disrupt pest reproduction. These BMPs are aimed at reducing pesticide use, thus reducing pesticide drift and run-off.• Provide funding for seeding /planting 1500 linear feet of stream to help stabilize stream banks. This would allow flexibility to experiment with various plant forms and species that might make buffers more palatable to orchard and row crop farmers.• Complete 1500 linear feet of stream restoration to stabilize streambanks, improve in-stream habitat and restore floodplain functions. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| I-6 Smith Creek Agricultural Sediment Initiative Phase II |
According to the 2001 Roanoke River Basinwide Water Quality Plan and the 2002 and 2004 NC 303(d) Impaired Waters List, Smith Creek is biologically impaired, and it is also impaired due to low dissolved oxygen. Erosion and sedimentation from agriculture was identified as being the potential source for the impairment. Corrective action is needed to achieve the goal of ultimately removing Smith Creek from the NC 303(d) list. The DWQ 2001 Roanoke Basinwide Management Plan stresses the need for restoration work and corrective action in the Smith Creek Watershed. Nonpoint source pollution has been identified as the contributor of most of the negative impacts on the creek. The Basinwide Management Plan suggests that an increase of voluntary BMPs need to be implemented on agricultural lands prior to substantial improvements in water quality can be detected. The NCACS Program as well as federally funded programs is continually being utilized throughout Warren County. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| NCB-1 Tar-Pamlico Rapid Response Team |
To relieve these constraints and provide more intensive and routine assessment of water quality issues in the Lower Neuse and Pamlico River and surrounding area, a satellite office of DWQ was created for a Neuse River Rapid Response Team in New Bern in June of 1997. In addition, a four-member team was formed in Washington in June of 1998 for the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. These teams are responsible for investigating environmental events such as fish kills, algal blooms, and other environmental problems. Other duties include water quality monitoring in the area, assisting USGS in maintenance of continuous monitors, citizen complaint investigations, buffer rule investigations and enhanced communications within the local area. Formation of this group has freed up resources in the Washington and Wilmington Regional Offices to allow similar response activities in other estuarine waters. Response includes collection of pertinent data and immediate transfer of those data to decision makers in the areas of fisheries, environment, and human health. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| R-1 Black Creek Watershed Assessment, Monitoring and Restoration Planning |
Black Creek is listed on the state’s 303(d) list as biologically impaired. The 2002 Neuse River Basinwide Plan indicates that habitat degradation from urban runoff is a likely cause of impairment. The watershed is approaching build-out with residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal parkland uses, although several forested parcels are yet to be built. The goals of the project are to:1. work with the community to cultivate a vision for the watershed, and then collaboratively develop community supported recommendations; 2. provide a watershed management and restoration plan that makes recommendations for BMP implementation, community education, and evaluation of the success of plan implementation;3. conduct a watershed assessment and implement a monitoring program that will more specifically determine the causes and sources of Black Creek’s impairment; and4. develop a demonstration model of cutting edge, robust technology for watershed assessment, monitoring, stressor amelioration assessment, and geodatabase implementation, The final watershed restoration plan will address the EPA’s nine required elements of a watershed plan. This watershed planning process will provide an opportunity at a teachable moment to educate local citizens and officials about watershed issues and involve them in the protection and restoration of a highly used and appreciated resource, while involving them in implementing solutions. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| R-2 Hyatt Creek Watershed Restoration Project |
This watershed restoration project is focused on the Hyatt Creek Watershed in Haywood County, NC. The goal of this project is to improve water quality in Hyatt Creek and remove it from the 303(d) list of impaired waters. Hyatt Creek is on the list due to sedimentation and siltation.
Using GIS technology and an Integrated Pollutant Source Identification data set to identify non-point sources and integrating a series of Best Management Practices to address watershed issues will provide a holistic approach to improving a severely degraded stream. This approach combined with a high degree of collaboration, including local state and federal government agencies, provide the local support, stakeholder buy in and financial resources that are necessary to begin healing a watershed after years of abuse. A comprehensive monitoring program will be implemented to demonstrate measurable results. Outreach and the results of this project will be disseminated through publications, presentations, and sharing our experiences with individual groups, watershed organizations and local governments. Hyatt Creek has significant recreation and economic implications for the County.
However, sediment and other pollutants are impacting the stream. Sources of impairment include animal feeding operations, stream bank erosion, limited riparian vegetation, storm water erosion, leaking septic tanks, development and possibly landfill leachings and a NPDES discharger. The project partners drafted a Watershed Action Plan to guide restoration efforts. BMPs include animal feeding operations fencing, alternative water sources, stream bank stabilization, riparian buffer plantings, implementing storm water erosion control, septic tank discharger repair, working with a state agency to monitor discharge from a closed landfill, creating low-impact development designs, supporting compliance efforts for NPDES permitting, and supporting regulatory compliance. The main goal of this project is to improve water quality in Hyatt Creek to the degree that it can be removed from the 303(d) list of impaired waters. Integrating BMPs to address storm water issues, restore eroding stream banks, improve riparian areas, eliminate animal access to streams and eliminate sources of animal and human waste will provide a holistic approach to improving a severely degraded stream. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| R-5 Newfound Creek Watershed Project |
Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District is requesting $351,738 for water quality improvement projects that will implement the TMDL for fecal coliform in Newfound Creek Watershed. Newfound Creek is listed on DWQ's 303(d) list as being severly impaired due to fecal coliform and sedimentation. The District would like to continue on-going effots of working in Newfound Creek community to install best management practices (BMPs) according to the USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service technical standards that would improve riparian zone and limit livestock access to the streams. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| R-6 Data Collection in Support of Upper Yadkin River Watershed-High Rock Lake Chlorophyll-a & Turbidity TMDL Modeling |
High Rock Lake is located in Rowan and Davidson Counties in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin, North Carolina and has been placed on the draft 2004 North Carolina list of impaired waters (303(d). Therefore, estimated of Total Daily Maximum Loads (TMDL's) is required by 2012. The upper portion of the lake is listed due to violation of chlorophyll a standards and turbidity. The Abbotts Creek Arm is listed as impaired due to violation of the turbidity standard, along the lower portion of the lake. The TMDL's will provide allowable nutrient loads associated with attainment of the chlorophyll a standard and the allowable sediment load associated with the turbidity standard. Completion of the TMDL's for High Rock Lake will require the development of water quality models for nutrient response and watershed loading. |
North Carolina |
2005 |
| Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDL Implementation for Spears and Kelly Creeks |
The environmental health of the Spears Creek/Kelly Creek watershed is currently threatened by excessive concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria. As a result of extensive monitoring at an ambient water quality monitoring station located on the US Hwy 601 bridge spanning the Spears Creek mainstem (CW-166), the South Carolina Department of Environmental Control (DHEC) has placed the Spears Creek project watershed area above the station (less than a quarter mile upstream of its confluence with McCaskill Creek) on their biennial 2004 303(d) listing (Impaired Waters List) for failing to meet the state fecal coliform bacteria water quality standard. Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and USEPA’s Water Quality Planning and Management Regulations (40 CFR Part 130) not only requires states to identify waterbodies failing to meet state water quality standards, but also to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for these waterbodies. A TMDL establishes the maximum allowable pollutant loading for a waterbody, allocates that load among pollutant contributors, and provides a basis for taking actions needed to restore water quality. The Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Spears and Kelly Creeks (Hydrologic Unit Code: 03050104-090 & Stations CW154 and CW166) Fecal Coliform Bacteria was completed in September 2004. According to the TMDL, “there are no currently active NPDES facilities in the watershed.” |
South Carolina |
2005 |
| Rabon Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Project |
The Rabon Creek watershed (11-digit HUC 03050109-130) is located in the Saluda River Basin in Laurens and Greenville counties near the towns of Laurens, Simpsonville, Fountain Inn, and Gray Court. Four stations in the watershed have been placed on the South Carolina §303(d) list of impaired waters for violations of the fecal coliform standard. The impaired stations are S-322, S-321, S-096, and S-307. Based on the Finalized EPA TMDL Document for Rabon Creek, a reduction of 3-65 percent will be required to bring the watershed within standard. This project will address these reductions through cost share assistance and education of area residents. This project will focus on the remaining NPS of fecal coliform including livestock, residential septic systems, illicit discharges and storm water. |
South Carolina |
2005 |
| Tyger River TMDL Implementation |
Tyger River has been included in the South Carolina’s Section 303(d) List for impaired waterbodies for violation of the fecal coliform water quality standard. A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for fecal coliform bacteria was developed for the 25 sampling sites within the watershed. Eleven of these fall within the MS4 areas. TMDLs for the remaining 15 sites call for reductions ranging from 16% to 82%. The TMDL development report indicates that non-point sources are the main contributors of fecal coliform bacteria contamination for these sites. |
South Carolina |
2005 |
| Clinch-Powell RC and D - Lower Clinch River WS Plan (Incr.) |
The project location is 12 river miles of the main stem Clinch River located within Hancock County TN (HUA- TN 06010205) and extending from Brooks Island Mussel Assemblage to Swan Island Mussel Assemblage. This area includes the following watersheds: Yellow Branch, Swan Island, Flea Creek, Brier Creek, Duck Creek, Greasy Rock Creek (303(d) listed), Fall Branch, Panther Creek (303(d) listed).
This rural Appalachian area is dotted with small marginal farms that depend solely on agriculture for their income. Even though these small family farms have provided a living for many citizens in the region, they often contribute a large amount of non-point source pollution into the streams because of historical farming practices and inadequate funds to install better and sounder management practices. habitat, eroding streambanks, agricultural runoff and failing septic tank systems.
The goal is to protect the rich biodiversity of the area by working with landowners to improve practices to reduce non-point source pollution to the rivers by protecting and restoring riparian buffers and reducing soil, nutrient, and chemical run-off. In our work with the local agricultural communities to apply BMPs. |
Tennessee |
2005 |
| College Creek Watershed Restoration |
College Creek has been classified as a warm water stream and is placed in the eco-region of Central Appalachian Ridges and Valleys. The soil within this watershed is Highly Erodible Soil (HEL) and will require special attention to sufficient sod coverage in critical areas.
College Creek’s watershed drainage area covers 3,000 acres, of which approximately 1,500 acres is farmland. There are 104 farms in this watershed of which only six are grazing operations and are located in the lower half of the watershed. The remaining 98 farms are mostly hobby farms with limited livestock. There are no dairy farms or row crop operations in this watershed at this time. A small acreage (approximately 20 acres annually) is planted to tobacco. The six beef farms run 30-160 head of cattle per farm. These beef farms rely on College Creek as a water source for their operations. Routine stream access by the cattle causes the stream banks to be worn down and collapse into the stream. Also, nutrients from animal waste runoff into the stream, which can increase the amount of bacteria in the stream. |
Tennessee |
2005 |
| Harpeth River Headwaters Restoration Plan Implementation |
Program focuses on implementation of BMPs and outreach/education and participation in watershed-based restoration plan in the Harpeth River headwaters area. This includes the city of Eagleville and a portion of Rutherford County.
Primary focus will be on BMP implementation in the following sub watersheds: Kelly Creek (TN05130204018-0400), Concord Creek (TN0513204018-0200), Unnamed tributary to Harpeth River (TN05130204018-0300) and Cheatham Branch (TN05130204018-0500). Secondary focus will include working with The Land Trust for TN to implement conservation easements. |
Tennessee |
2005 |
| Harpeth River Jones Creek Watershed Plan Implementation
|
Program focus on implementation of BMPs and outreach/education and participation in watershed-based plan in the Harpeth River, Jones Creek Subwatershed. Primary focus will be on BMP implementation in the following sub watersheds: Unnamed Tributary to Jones Creek (TN05130204002-0500), Jones Creek (TN0513204002-2000), and Jones Creek (TN05130204002-3000). Secondary focus will include working with The Land Trust for TN to implement conservation easements. |
Tennessee |
2005 |
| Ijams Nature Center - Stock Creek Watershed Restoration Plan |
Funding requested through this proposal will enable the SCWI to develop a Stock Creek Watershed Restoration Plan that will identify priority sites for BMP installation in order to remove Stock Creek from the 303(d) list. This plan will be based on analyzed watershed data and stakeholder input. The Water Quality Forum (WQF) will be the administering entity for this proposed project, with Ijams Nature Center being its fiscal agent. The WQF is a consortium of agencies, organizations, academic institutions, public utilities, and interested citizens working to protect and restore the waterways in Knox and the eight surrounding counties.
In order to focus our efforts on restoring Stock Creek to its fully designated uses, we are requesting funding to develop a Stock Creek Watershed Restoration Plan. This plan will be based on compiled, analyzed, and verified water quality data. In order to ensure development of a comprehensive plan that has community buy-in and support, we will identify stakeholder perceptions on watershed issues and involve them in the planning process. We will also use EPA’s Nine Components of Watershed Plans and the Center for Watershed Protection’s (CWP) Eight Tools of Watershed Protection as guides in developing this plan. |
Tennessee |
2005 |
| Stones River Watershed Association - Lytle Creek Watershed Restoration, Phase 1 |
Lytle Creek has a drainage area of approximately 25 square miles and is approximately 15 miles long. It runs through the middle of downtown Murfreesboro and has a portion of the City’s Greenway system built on its bank. The creek’s high visibility makes it a prime candidate for public education and awareness campaigns. Future phases of the restoration efforts will focus on raising awareness along the greenway. The creek has also had other projects conducted on it previously, including water quality assessments and stream cleanups. Mark Abolins with MTSU was awarded a 319 grant in the past to document the presence or absence of riparian corridors along Lytle Creek and others in the area. The watershed restoration plan will build upon data already collected by MTSU. Lytle Creek is in the Stones River Watershed. Lytle Creek has an approved TMDL for siltation and habitat modification. This restoration plan will address these impairments through data collection and restoration plan development. Partners in developing the restoration plan include the two local governments that contain the creek in their jurisdiction, MTSU, and the Harpeth River Watershed Association. 1. Lytle Creek (TN05130203-022-1000 and 2000) is located in the Stones River Watershed, in Rutherford County and the City of Murfreesboro. 2. Lytle Creek has a TMDL for siltation and habitat alteration. 3. The waterbody segment numbers, from the 303(d) List are TN05130203-022-1000 and 2000. |
Tennessee |
2005 |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}