Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us




Final Guidance

Implementing Institutional Controls in Indian Country, November 2013 [PDF 108K / 13pp.]

The implementation of ICs in Indian Country presents unique circumstances that can be distinguished from the EPA's current ICs practice and guidance that is derived from traditional English and American real property law and government legal theory. This cross-program handbook is designed to recognize these unique circumstances, to reinforce the EPA's policy to engage tribes early in thecleanup process and to ensure that tribes receive the same level of protectiveness as states during and after cleanups.

Institutional Controls: A Guide to Planning, Implementing, Maintaining, and Enforcing Institutional Controls at Contaminated Sites, December 2012 [PDF 452K / 40pp.]

This guidance identifies and addresses many of the common issues that may be encountered when using ICs pursuant to several of the Agency's cleanup programs (Superfund remedial and removal, federal facilities, Brownfields, underground storage tanks, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act sites). It also provides an overview of the Agency's policy regarding the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders involved in various aspects of the IC life cycle, namely the planning, implementing, maintaining, and enforcing of ICs.

Institutional Controls:A Guide to Preparing Institutional Control Implementation and Assurance Plans at Contaminated Sites, December 2012 [PDF 160K / 16pp.]

This guidance provides EPA Regions with a template for developing IC plans (i.e., ICIAPs) at contaminated sites where the response action includes ICs. An ICIAP is a document designed to systematically: (a) establish and document the activities associated with implementing and ensuring the long-term stewardship of ICs: and (b) specify the persons and/or entities that will be responsible for conducting these activities.

Recommended Evaluation of Institutional Controls: Supplement to the "Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance", OSWER Directive 9355.7-18, September 2011 [PDF 2.2MB / 28pp.]

This guidance supplements OSWER's 2001 Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance and provides recommendations for conducting five-year reviews for the IC component of remedies in a manner similar to the review of engineering or other remedy components.

"Enforcement First" to Ensure Effective Institutional Controls at Superfund Sites, OSWER Directive No. 9208.2, March 2006 [PDF 153K / 5pp.]

On September 20,2002, OSWER and OECA jointly issued a memorandum requesting Regions to redouble their attention to EPA's "enforcement first" policy.' While that memorandum focused largely on Remedial Action construction activities, it also noted that the "enforcement first" policy applies throughout the Superfund cleanup process. The purpose of today's memorandum is to state explicitly that the "enforcement first" policy also applies to any actions needed to ensure the implementation and effectiveness of institutional controls.

Institutional Controls Bibliography: Institutional Control, Remedy Selection, and Post-Construction Completion Guidance and Policy, OSWER 9355.0110, December 2005 [PDF 109K / 9pp.] Transmittal of Institutional Controls Bibliography [PDF 137K / 2pp.]

The purpose of this document is to serve as a reference for policy guidelines concerning the use of institutional controls (ICs). The IC Bibliography covers 40 guidance and policy documents and provides citations and brief synopses of the IC use and policy information contained in each.

Institutional Controls: A Citizen's Guide to Understanding Institutional Controls at Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facilities, Underground Storage Tank, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Cleanups, EPA-540-R-04-003, OSWER 9355.0-98, February 2005 [PDF 57K / 7pp.]

The purpose of this guide is to provide community members with general information about the role of institutional controls (ICs) in Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facilities, Underground Storage Tanks (UST) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) cleanups occurring in their neighborhoods. This guide will also discuss the community's role in providing input for the selection of ICs and helping to monitor them to ensure that human health and the environment remain protected in the future.

Transmittal of "Institutional Controls: Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Proprietary Controls", April 2004 [PDF 91K / 10pp.]

The purpose of this memorandum is to distribute the attached document entitled, "Institutional Controls: Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Proprietary Controls." This document was drafted with assistance from the EPA Regions and cleanup program offices through the National Institutional Controls Enforcement Policy Workgroup. The document provides information, primarily for EPA attorneys, on designating third-party beneficiaries in proprietary institutional controls to ensure more effective controls by affording an additional means of enforcement.

Institutional Controls: A Site Manager's Guide to Identifying, Evaluating and Selecting Institutional Controls at Superfund and RCRA Corrective Action Cleanups, EPA 540-F-00-005, OSWER 9355.0-74FS-P, September 2000 [PDF 221K / 32pp.]

This guidance is intended to provide Superfund and RCRA site managers and other decision makers with an overview of the types of institutional controls (ICs) that are commonly available, including their relative strengths and weaknesses, and to provide a discussion of the key factors to consider when evaluating and selecting ICs in Superfund and RCRA Corrective Action cleanups.

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.

Solid Waste and Emergency Response Home | Superfund Home | Innovative Technologies Home